From: "Borah, Chaitanya Kumar" <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
To: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>, <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/intel: Add mode-rejected-max-dotclock subtest to kms_cdclk
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 15:02:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb93ef82-ae63-4795-8d29-8ac279cb681e@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260819073858.185542-2-swati2.sharma@intel.com>
On 8/19/2026 1:08 PM, Swati Sharma wrote:
> Add a subtest that verifies the driver rejects a modeset when the
> requested pixel clock exceeds the platform's maximum dotclock
> capability. The test reads the max dotclock from debugfs via
> igt_get_max_dotclock(), sets the mode clock 50 MHz above, and
> asserts the atomic commit fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Swati Sharma <swati2.sharma@intel.com>
> Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot:Claude Opus 4.6
> ---
> tests/intel/kms_cdclk.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/kms_cdclk.c b/tests/intel/kms_cdclk.c
> index 070fba400..33007f6b3 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/kms_cdclk.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/kms_cdclk.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,10 @@
> *
> * SUBTEST: plane-scaling
> * Description: Plane scaling test to validate cdclk frequency change.
> + *
> + * SUBTEST: mode-rejected-max-dotclock
> + * Description: Verify that a mode exceeding the maximum pixel clock
> + * frequency is rejected by the driver.
> */
>
> IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Test cdclk features : crawling and squashing");
> @@ -354,6 +358,62 @@ static void run_cdclk_test(data_t *data, uint32_t flags)
> }
> }
>
> +static void test_mode_rejected_max_dotclock(data_t *data)
> +{
> + igt_display_t *display = &data->display;
> + igt_output_t *output;
> + igt_crtc_t *crtc;
> + int max_dotclock, ret;
> + struct igt_fb fb;
> +
> + max_dotclock = igt_get_max_dotclock(data->drm_fd);
> + igt_require_f(max_dotclock > 0,
> + "Could not read max pixel clock\n");
> +
> + for_each_crtc_with_valid_output(display, crtc, output) {
> + drmModeModeInfo mode = *igt_output_get_mode(output);
> +
> + igt_output_set_crtc(output, crtc);
> + if (!intel_pipe_output_combo_valid(display)) {
> + igt_output_set_crtc(output, NULL);
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + /* Set clock above PHY max */
> + mode.clock = max_dotclock + 50000;
> +
> + igt_display_reset(display);
We need a do_cleanup_display() like all other tests in this file. Given
that every test in this file (including the new one) skips its own
end-of-test cleanup when its assertion fails, a prior failing subtest
can leave hardware in a unwanted committed state.
> + igt_output_set_crtc(output, crtc);
> + igt_output_override_mode(output, &mode);
> +
> + igt_create_pattern_fb(data->drm_fd,
> + mode.hdisplay, mode.vdisplay,
> + DRM_FORMAT_XRGB8888,
> + DRM_FORMAT_MOD_LINEAR, &fb);
> + igt_plane_set_fb(igt_output_get_plane_type(output,
> + DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY), &fb);
Let's cache the primary plane instead of calling
igt_output_get_plane_type() multiple times.
With these, LGTM
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kumar Borah <chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com>
> +
> + ret = igt_display_try_commit_atomic(display,
> + DRM_MODE_ATOMIC_ALLOW_MODESET,
> + NULL);
> +
> + igt_info("Output %s: clock=%dkHz (max=%dkHz) -> %s\n",
> + output->name, mode.clock, max_dotclock,
> + ret ? "rejected" : "accepted");
> +
> + igt_assert_f(ret != 0,
> + "Mode with clock=%dkHz exceeding max=%dkHz "
> + "should be rejected on %s\n",
> + mode.clock, max_dotclock, output->name);
> +
> + igt_plane_set_fb(igt_output_get_plane_type(output,
> + DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY), NULL);
> + igt_output_set_crtc(output, NULL);
> + igt_remove_fb(data->drm_fd, &fb);
> + break;
> + }
> +}
> +
> int igt_main()
> {
> data_t data = {};
> @@ -384,6 +444,10 @@ int igt_main()
> igt_subtest("mode-transition-all-outputs")
> test_mode_transition_on_all_outputs(&data);
>
> + igt_describe("Verify that a mode exceeding max pixel clock is rejected.");
> + igt_subtest("mode-rejected-max-dotclock")
> + test_mode_rejected_max_dotclock(&data);
> +
> igt_fixture() {
> igt_display_fini(&data.display);
> drm_close_driver(data.drm_fd);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 9:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-19 7:38 [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] tests/intel: Add kms_hdmi_audio_bw test Swati Sharma
2026-08-19 7:38 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/intel: Add mode-rejected-max-dotclock subtest to kms_cdclk Swati Sharma
2026-08-31 9:32 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar [this message]
2026-08-19 9:45 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [i-g-t,1/2] tests/intel: Add kms_hdmi_audio_bw test Patchwork
2026-08-19 10:01 ` ✓ i915.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-19 12:28 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: " Patchwork
2026-08-19 15:13 ` ✓ i915.CI.Full: " Patchwork
2026-08-31 8:55 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] " Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
2026-09-01 12:03 ` Borah, Chaitanya Kumar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-08-14 12:16 [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/intel: Add mode-rejected-max-dotclock subtest to kms_cdclk Swati Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb93ef82-ae63-4795-8d29-8ac279cb681e@intel.com \
--to=chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=swati2.sharma@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox