From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 13/24] i915/gem_ctx_param: Test set/get (copy) VM
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 10:22:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d0f0ef4f-716f-ad65-3cc4-269e26cc1291@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190322092155.1656-13-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
On 22/03/2019 09:21, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Exercise reusing the GTT of one ctx in another.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_ctx_param.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_param.c b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_param.c
> index b3f8637df..54ade8b4b 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_ctx_param.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_ctx_param.c
> @@ -36,17 +36,6 @@ IGT_TEST_DESCRIPTION("Basic test for context set/get param input validation.");
> #define NEW_CTX BIT(0)
> #define USER BIT(1)
>
> -static int reopen_driver(int fd)
> -{
> - char path[256];
> -
> - snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "/proc/self/fd/%d", fd);
> - fd = open(path, O_RDWR);
> - igt_assert_lte(0, fd);
> -
> - return fd;
> -}
> -
> static void set_priority(int i915)
> {
> static const int64_t test_values[] = {
> @@ -91,7 +80,7 @@ static void set_priority(int i915)
> igt_permute_array(values, size, igt_exchange_int64);
>
> igt_fork(flags, NEW_CTX | USER) {
> - int fd = reopen_driver(i915);
> + int fd = gem_reopen_driver(i915);
> struct drm_i915_gem_context_param arg = {
> .param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_PRIORITY,
> .ctx_id = flags & NEW_CTX ? gem_context_create(fd) : 0,
> @@ -143,6 +132,73 @@ static void set_priority(int i915)
> free(values);
> }
>
> +static uint32_t __batch_create(int i915, uint32_t offset)
> +{
> + const uint32_t bbe = MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END;
> + uint32_t handle;
> +
> + handle = gem_create(i915, ALIGN(offset + 4, 4096));
> + gem_write(i915, handle, offset, &bbe, sizeof(bbe));
> +
> + return handle;
> +}
> +
> +static uint32_t batch_create(int i915)
> +{
> + return __batch_create(i915, 0);
> +}
Looks familiar. :)
> +
> +static void test_vm(int i915)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 batch = {
> + .handle = batch_create(i915),
> + };
> + struct drm_i915_gem_execbuffer2 eb = {
> + .buffers_ptr = to_user_pointer(&batch),
> + .buffer_count = 1,
> + };
> + struct drm_i915_gem_context_param arg = {
> + .param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_VM,
> + };
> + uint32_t parent, child;
> +
> + arg.value = -1ull;
> + igt_require(__gem_context_set_param(i915, &arg) == -ENOENT);
> +
> + parent = gem_context_create(i915);
> + child = gem_context_create(i915);
> +
> + eb.rsvd1 = parent;
> + batch.offset = 48 << 20;
> + gem_execbuf(i915, &eb);
> + igt_assert_eq_u64(batch.offset, 48 << 20);
> +
> + eb.rsvd1 = child;
> + batch.offset = 0;
> + gem_execbuf(i915, &eb);
> + igt_assert_eq_u64(batch.offset, 0);
> +
> + eb.rsvd1 = parent;
> + gem_execbuf(i915, &eb);
> + igt_assert_eq_u64(batch.offset, 48 << 20);
Please drop a comment at the start of these execbuf operations to
explain what and why. We don't need softpin to guarantee they will get
pinned to where we want them to?
> +
> + arg.ctx_id = parent;
> + gem_context_get_param(i915, &arg);
> +
> + arg.ctx_id = child;
> + gem_context_set_param(i915, &arg);
Another get param to assert child vm id is the same as the parent?
Also, try self-assign? I mean set the same vm id as already have?
> +
> + eb.rsvd1 = child;
> + gem_execbuf(i915, &eb);
> + igt_assert_eq_u64(batch.offset, 48 << 20);
Interesting, for me at least. Please put a comment here.
> +
> + gem_context_destroy(i915, child);
> + gem_context_destroy(i915, parent);
> +
> + gem_sync(i915, batch.handle);
> + gem_close(i915, batch.handle);
> +}
> +
> igt_main
> {
> struct drm_i915_gem_context_param arg;
> @@ -253,6 +309,9 @@ igt_main
> gem_context_set_param(fd, &arg);
> }
>
> + igt_subtest("vm")
> + test_vm(fd);
> +
> arg.param = I915_CONTEXT_PARAM_PRIORITY;
>
> igt_subtest("set-priority-not-supported") {
>
Add to basic test list? Or call basic-vm? Honestly don't remember how we
do it these days..
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-26 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-22 9:21 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 01/24] i915/gem_exec_latency: Measure the latency of context switching Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 02/24] lib: Add GPU power measurement Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 8:36 ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-26 8:49 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 9:18 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t v2] " Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 9:52 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-26 10:06 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 03/24] i915/gem_exec_schedule: Measure semaphore power consumption Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 8:46 ` [Intel-gfx] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-26 9:23 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 04/24] i915/gem_exec_whisper: Measure total power consumed Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 8:47 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 05/24] i915/gem_exec_schedule: Verify that using HW semaphores doesn't block Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 9:19 ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-26 10:03 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 06/24] i915/gem_exec_nop: poll-sequential requires ordering between rings Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 9:38 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 07/24] i915/gem_sync: Make switch-default asymmetric Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 9:57 ` [Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 08/24] i915/gem_ctx_param: Remove kneecapping Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 9:58 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 09/24] i915/gem_exec_big: Add a single shot test Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 10:06 ` [igt-dev] " Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-26 10:21 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 10/24] kms_fence_pin_leak: Ask for the GPU before use Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 10:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 11/24] drm-uapi: Import i915_drm.h upto 53073249452d Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 12/24] lib/i915: Improve gem_context error messages Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 10:14 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 13/24] i915/gem_ctx_param: Test set/get (copy) VM Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 10:22 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2019-03-26 10:33 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-26 10:51 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 14/24] i915/gem_ctx_create: Basic checks for constructor properties Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 10:46 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-26 11:06 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 15/24] i915: Add gem_vm_create Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 11:21 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-26 11:37 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 11:48 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-26 14:11 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 16/24] drm-uapi: Import i915_drm.h upto 364df3d04d51 Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 17/24] i915: Add gem_ctx_clone Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 15:44 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2019-03-26 15:49 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-26 15:54 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 18/24] i915: Exercise creating context with shared GTT Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 19/24] i915/gem_ctx_switch: Exercise queues Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 20/24] i915/gem_exec_whisper: Fork all-engine tests one-per-engine Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 21/24] i915/gem_exec_whisper: debugfs/next_seqno is defunct Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 22/24] i915: Add gem_ctx_engines Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 16:40 ` Andi Shyti
2019-03-22 16:48 ` Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 23/24] i915: Add gem_exec_balancer Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 9:21 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 24/24] i915/gem_exec_balancer: Exercise bonded pairs Chris Wilson
2019-03-22 10:22 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for series starting with [i-g-t,01/24] i915/gem_exec_latency: Measure the latency of context switching Patchwork
2019-03-23 6:38 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2019-03-26 11:00 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for series starting with [i-g-t,01/24] i915/gem_exec_latency: Measure the latency of context switching (rev2) Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d0f0ef4f-716f-ad65-3cc4-269e26cc1291@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox