From: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
To: Jonathan-Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>,
<igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <saurabhg.gupta@intel.com>, <alex.zuo@intel.com>,
<kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/intel/xe_pm_residency: Skip on igt_power_open failure
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2024 19:51:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d790ab39-cdc0-4ac7-8629-e2e993c10cb4@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241004135820.1800808-1-jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
Hi Jonathan
On 10/4/2024 7:28 PM, Jonathan-Cavitt wrote:
> The xe_pm_residency@toggle-gt-c6 test fails when
> gt_c6_power >= gt_c0_power. These values are reported by
> igt_power_get_mW, which will always report 0 in the case that
> igt_power_open fails to open either the hwmon_fd or rapl.fd. Since the
> expected result will always be a failure in this case, skip the
> assertion that gt_c6_power < gt_c0_power.
>
> v2: Do not skip the full test, and instead only ignore the part that is
> guaranteed to fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan-Cavitt <jonathan.cavitt@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kamil Konieczny <kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com>
> CC: Riana Tauro <riana.tauro@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/intel/xe_pm_residency.c | 10 +++++++---
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_pm_residency.c b/tests/intel/xe_pm_residency.c
> index 772fe9b574..0f146bad1c 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_pm_residency.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_pm_residency.c
> @@ -282,10 +282,14 @@ static void measure_power(struct igt_power *gpu, double *power)
> static void toggle_gt_c6(int fd, int n)
> {
> double gt_c0_power, gt_c6_power;
> - int gt;
> + int gt, ret;
> struct igt_power gpu;
>
> - igt_power_open(fd, &gpu, "gpu");
> + /*
> + * igt_power_get_mW will always return 0 if igt_power_open fails,
> + * so skip the power check in this case.
> + */
> + ret = igt_power_open(fd, &gpu, "gpu");
>
> do {
> fw_handle = igt_debugfs_open(fd, "forcewake_all", O_RDONLY);
> @@ -312,7 +316,7 @@ static void toggle_gt_c6(int fd, int n)
> igt_info("GPU consumed %fmW in GT C6 and %fmW in GT C0\n", gt_c6_power, gt_c0_power);
>
> /* FIXME: Remove dgfx check after hwmon is added */
> - if (!xe_has_vram(fd))
> + if (!xe_has_vram(fd) && !ret)
Should be ||
Thanks
Riana Tauro
> igt_assert_f(gt_c6_power < gt_c0_power,
> "Power consumed in GT C6 should be lower than GT C0\n");
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-04 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-04 13:58 [PATCH i-g-t v2] tests/intel/xe_pm_residency: Skip on igt_power_open failure Jonathan-Cavitt
2024-10-04 14:21 ` Riana Tauro [this message]
2024-10-04 15:19 ` Cavitt, Jonathan
2024-10-07 16:03 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for tests/intel/xe_pm_residency: Skip on igt_power_open failure (rev3) Patchwork
2024-10-07 16:04 ` ✓ CI.xeBAT: success " Patchwork
2024-10-08 7:12 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d790ab39-cdc0-4ac7-8629-e2e993c10cb4@intel.com \
--to=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=alex.zuo@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jonathan.cavitt@intel.com \
--cc=kamil.konieczny@linux.intel.com \
--cc=saurabhg.gupta@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox