From: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
To: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH] test/perf: Add support for TGL in perf tests
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:22:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7981005-e69f-bb18-3e28-fb1924f51fab@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191014185749.62995-1-umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
On 14/10/2019 21:57, Umesh Nerlige Ramappa wrote:
> Add following changes to enable perf tests on TGL
> - Support only a single OA format
> - Add TGL metrics
> - Update whitelist test case
> - Cleanup mi-rpc test if it fails
> - Skip unsupported test - gen8-unprivileged-single-ctx-counters
>
> Signed-off-by: Umesh Nerlige Ramappa <umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com>
> ---
> tests/perf.c | 85 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/perf.c b/tests/perf.c
> index 5ad8b2db..c5fc6878 100644
> --- a/tests/perf.c
> +++ b/tests/perf.c
> @@ -159,6 +159,15 @@ static struct oa_format gen8_oa_formats[I915_OA_FORMAT_MAX] = {
> .b_off = 32, .n_b = 8, },
> };
>
> +static struct oa_format gen12_oa_formats[I915_OA_FORMAT_MAX] = {
> + [I915_OA_FORMAT_A32u40_A4u32_B8_C8] = {
> + "A32u40_A4u32_B8_C8", .size = 256,
> + .a40_high_off = 160, .a40_low_off = 16, .n_a40 = 32,
> + .a_off = 144, .n_a = 4, .first_a = 32,
> + .b_off = 192, .n_b = 8,
> + .c_off = 224, .n_c = 8, },
> +};
> +
> static bool hsw_undefined_a_counters[45] = {
> [4] = true,
> [6] = true,
> @@ -206,7 +215,10 @@ get_oa_format(enum drm_i915_oa_format format)
> {
> if (IS_HASWELL(devid))
> return hsw_oa_formats[format];
> - return gen8_oa_formats[format];
> + else if (IS_GEN12(devid))
> + return gen12_oa_formats[format];
> + else
> + return gen8_oa_formats[format];
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -945,6 +957,8 @@ init_sys_info(void)
> test_set_uuid = "db41edd4-d8e7-4730-ad11-b9a2d6833503";
> } else if (IS_ICELAKE(devid)) {
> test_set_uuid = "a291665e-244b-4b76-9b9a-01de9d3c8068";
> + } else if (IS_TIGERLAKE(devid)) {
> + test_set_uuid = "80a833f0-2504-4321-8894-e9277844ce7b";
> } else {
> igt_debug("unsupported GT\n");
> return false;
> @@ -2813,6 +2827,7 @@ test_mi_rpc(void)
> drm_intel_bo *bo;
> uint32_t *report32;
> int ret;
> + uint32_t word0, word1, word63, word64;
>
> stream_fd = __perf_open(drm_fd, ¶m, false);
>
> @@ -2842,18 +2857,26 @@ test_mi_rpc(void)
> igt_assert_eq(ret, 0);
>
> report32 = bo->virtual;
> - igt_assert_eq(report32[0], 0xdeadbeef); /* report ID */
> - igt_assert_neq(report32[1], 0); /* timestamp */
> -
> - igt_assert_neq(report32[63], 0x80808080); /* end of report */
> - igt_assert_eq(report32[64], 0x80808080); /* after 256 byte report */
> + word0 = report32[0];
> + word1 = report32[1];
> + word63 = report32[63];
> + word64 = report32[64];
>
> + /* cleanup before you fail for any sanity checks so that subsequent
> + * tests do not fail because of bad perf state.
> + */
> drm_intel_bo_unmap(bo);
> drm_intel_bo_unreference(bo);
> intel_batchbuffer_free(batch);
> drm_intel_gem_context_destroy(context);
> drm_intel_bufmgr_destroy(bufmgr);
> __perf_close(stream_fd);
> +
> + igt_assert_eq(word0, 0xdeadbeef); /* report ID */
> + igt_assert_neq(word1, 0); /* timestamp */
> +
> + igt_assert_neq(word63, 0x80808080); /* end of report */
> + igt_assert_eq(word64, 0x80808080); /* after 256 byte report */
Any reason for this change? I can't see any functional change.
> }
>
> static void
> @@ -3846,6 +3869,8 @@ test_whitelisted_registers_userspace_config(void)
> uint32_t b_counters_regs[200];
> uint32_t flex_regs[200];
> uint32_t i;
> + uint32_t oa_start_trig1, oa_start_trig8;
> + uint32_t oa_report_trig1, oa_report_trig8;
> uint64_t config_id;
> char path[512];
> int ret;
> @@ -3869,14 +3894,26 @@ test_whitelisted_registers_userspace_config(void)
> memset(&config, 0, sizeof(config));
> memcpy(config.uuid, uuid, sizeof(config.uuid));
>
> + if (intel_gen(devid) >= 12) {
> + oa_start_trig1 = 0xd900;
> + oa_start_trig8 = 0xd91c;
> + oa_report_trig1 = 0xd920;
> + oa_report_trig8 = 0xd93c;
> + } else {
> + oa_start_trig1 = 0x2710;
> + oa_start_trig8 = 0x272c;
> + oa_report_trig1 = 0x2740;
> + oa_report_trig8 = 0x275c;
> + }
> +
> /* OASTARTTRIG[1-8] */
> - for (i = 0x2710; i <= 0x272c; i += 4) {
> + for (i = oa_start_trig1; i <= oa_start_trig8; i += 4) {
> b_counters_regs[config.n_boolean_regs * 2] = i;
> b_counters_regs[config.n_boolean_regs * 2 + 1] = 0;
> config.n_boolean_regs++;
> }
> /* OAREPORTTRIG[1-8] */
> - for (i = 0x2740; i <= 0x275c; i += 4) {
> + for (i = oa_report_trig1; i <= oa_report_trig8; i += 4) {
> b_counters_regs[config.n_boolean_regs * 2] = i;
> b_counters_regs[config.n_boolean_regs * 2 + 1] = 0;
> config.n_boolean_regs++;
> @@ -3896,10 +3933,6 @@ test_whitelisted_registers_userspace_config(void)
> /* Mux registers (too many of them, just checking bounds) */
> i = 0;
>
> - /* NOA_WRITE */
> - mux_regs[i++] = 0x9800;
> - mux_regs[i++] = 0;
> -
> if (IS_HASWELL(devid)) {
> /* Haswell specific. undocumented... */
> mux_regs[i++] = 0x9ec0;
> @@ -3922,10 +3955,6 @@ test_whitelisted_registers_userspace_config(void)
> mux_regs[i++] = 0;
> }
>
> - /* HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN2 (shared with kernel workaround) */
> - mux_regs[i++] = 0xE180;
> - mux_regs[i++] = 0;
> -
> if (IS_CHERRYVIEW(devid)) {
> /* Cherryview specific. undocumented... */
> mux_regs[i++] = 0x182300;
> @@ -3934,12 +3963,20 @@ test_whitelisted_registers_userspace_config(void)
> mux_regs[i++] = 0;
> }
>
> - /* PERFCNT[12] */
> - mux_regs[i++] = 0x91B8;
> - mux_regs[i++] = 0;
> - /* PERFMATRIX */
> - mux_regs[i++] = 0x91C8;
> - mux_regs[i++] = 0;
> + if (intel_gen(devid) <= 11) {
> + /* NOA_WRITE */
> + mux_regs[i++] = 0x9800;
> + mux_regs[i++] = 0;
> + /* HALF_SLICE_CHICKEN2 (shared with kernel workaround) */
> + mux_regs[i++] = 0xE180;
> + mux_regs[i++] = 0;
> + /* PERFCNT[12] */
> + mux_regs[i++] = 0x91B8;
> + mux_regs[i++] = 0;
> + /* PERFMATRIX */
> + mux_regs[i++] = 0x91C8;
> + mux_regs[i++] = 0;
> + }
>
> config.mux_regs_ptr = (uintptr_t) mux_regs;
> config.n_mux_regs = i / 2;
> @@ -4170,8 +4207,10 @@ igt_main
> * functionality to HW filter timer reports for a specific
> * context (SKL+) can't stop multiple applications viewing
> * system-wide data via MI_REPORT_PERF_COUNT commands.
> + *
> + * For gen12 implement a separate test that uses only OAR
Where is that test? :)
-Lionel
> */
> - igt_require(intel_gen(devid) >= 8);
> + igt_require(intel_gen(devid) >= 8 && intel_gen(devid) < 12);
> gen8_test_single_ctx_render_target_writes_a_counter();
> }
>
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-24 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-14 18:57 [igt-dev] [PATCH] test/perf: Add support for TGL in perf tests Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2019-10-14 20:21 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2019-10-15 7:47 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2019-10-24 11:22 ` Lionel Landwerlin [this message]
2019-10-24 19:22 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH] " Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
2019-10-25 6:14 ` Lionel Landwerlin
2019-10-30 23:40 ` Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-10-31 0:24 Umesh Nerlige Ramappa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d7981005-e69f-bb18-3e28-fb1924f51fab@intel.com \
--to=lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=umesh.nerlige.ramappa@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox