public inbox for igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Tauro, Riana" <riana.tauro@intel.com>
To: "Dixit, Ashutosh" <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>,
	"igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: "Nilawar, Badal" <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/i915_power: Measure GPU idle/busy power
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 11:16:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <da82dcc9-2d27-4a16-46a8-349277f2108b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o7qvurlo.wl-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>



On 1/19/2023 9:02 AM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 23:22:46 -0800, Tauro, Riana wrote:
>>
>> Hi Ashutosh
>>
> 
> Hi Riana,
> 
>> Energy measurement when idle and with workload is also a part of rc6-idle
>> test.  Why do we need new tests?
> 
> We want to be able to measure max/peak power.
> 
> rc6-idle has this:
> 
> static void bg_load()
> {
> 	...
> 		/* aim for ~1% busy */
> 
> Therefore it measures this:
> 
> [adixit@DUT1220-DG2SVC igt-gpu-tools]$ sudo ./build/tests/i915_pm_rc6_residency --r rc6-idle
> IGT-Version: 1.27-g369bb6fb0f (x86_64) (Linux: 5.15.47+ x86_64)
> Opened device: /dev/dri/card0
> Starting subtest: rc6-idle
> Starting dynamic subtest: gt0-rcs0
> Total energy used while idle: 85825.3mJ (28606.5mW)
> Total energy used for normal: 86731.6mJ (28908.6mW)
> Total energy used for boost: 86992.8mJ (28995.8mW)
> Total energy used for once: 86677.9mJ (28890.5mW)
> Dynamic subtest gt0-rcs0: SUCCESS (12.235s)
> 
> The new test measures this:
> 
> [adixit@DUT1220-DG2SVC igt-gpu-tools]$ sudo ./build/tests/i915_power
> IGT-Version: 1.27-g369bb6fb0f (x86_64) (Linux: 5.15.47+ x86_64)
> Opened device: /dev/dri/card0
> Starting subtest: gpu-idle
> Measured power: 28535.5 mW
> Subtest gpu-idle: SUCCESS (3.002s)
> Starting subtest: gpu-busy
> Measured power: 50331.9 mW
> Subtest gpu-busy: SUCCESS (3.008s)
> 
> So you can see rc6-idle basically measures idle power (28 W instead of 50
> W), not power under load.
> 
> Other tests such as gem_exec_schedule also have igt_require etc. which skip
> in all sorts of situations. That is why I was forced to write these simple
> new tests.

Hi Ashutosh

Thanks for the clarification.

Riana
> Thanks.
> --
> Ashutosh

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-23  5:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-17 19:03 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/i915_power: Measure GPU idle/busy power Ashutosh Dixit
2023-01-17 20:54 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2023-01-18  6:30 ` [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] " Gupta, Anshuman
2023-01-18  7:22   ` Tauro, Riana
2023-01-19  3:32     ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-01-23  5:46       ` Tauro, Riana [this message]
2023-01-19  5:07   ` Dixit, Ashutosh
2023-01-18 10:29 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: success for " Patchwork

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=da82dcc9-2d27-4a16-46a8-349277f2108b@intel.com \
    --to=riana.tauro@intel.com \
    --cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
    --cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox