From: "Grzegorzek, Dominik" <dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com>
To: "igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org" <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"Sokolowski, Jan" <jan.sokolowski@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t v1] /tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online: Remove vm_open_trigger on debugger reattachment.
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 11:40:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <de2dfcd96e63597e4eb6ed6a44089195bc2d2923.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241024112917.327660-1-jan.sokolowski@intel.com>
Hi Jan!
On Thu, 2024-10-24 at 11:29 +0000, Jan Sokolowski wrote:
> On debugger detach-and-reattach, discovery worker will replay events
> that have occurred, which leads to a vm event being sent and
> vm_open_trigger being re-run, which would lead to us trying
> to open a removed vm.
>
> On debugger reattach trigger, remove vm open trigger from list of
> triggers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Sokolowski <jan.sokolowski@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/xe/xe_eudebug.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/xe/xe_eudebug.h | 2 ++
> tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online.c | 6 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_eudebug.c b/lib/xe/xe_eudebug.c
> index 36763a184..62f7e7361 100644
> --- a/lib/xe/xe_eudebug.c
> +++ b/lib/xe/xe_eudebug.c
> @@ -1226,6 +1226,31 @@ void xe_eudebug_debugger_add_trigger(struct xe_eudebug_debugger *d,
> igt_debug("added trigger %p\n", t);
> }
>
> +/**
> + * xe_eudebug_debugger_remove_trigger:
> + * @d: pointer to the debugger
> + * @type: the type of the event which activates the trigger.
> + * @fn: function to be removed when event of @type was read by the debugger.
> + *
> + * Removes function @fn from the list of triggers activated when event of
> + * @type has been read by worker.
> + */
> +void xe_eudebug_debugger_remove_trigger(struct xe_eudebug_debugger *d,
> + int type, xe_eudebug_trigger_fn fn)
> +{
> + struct event_trigger *t;
> +
> + igt_list_for_each_entry(t, &d->triggers, link) {
igt_list_for_each_entry_safe
> + if (type == t->type && fn == t->fn) {
> + igt_list_del(&t->link);
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + igt_debug("removed trigger %p\n", t);
> + free(t);
What if it has not been found? You would then free the head.
Also igt_warn if it was not found would be welcome.
> +}
> +
> /**
> * xe_eudebug_debugger_start_worker:
> * @d: pointer to the debugger
> diff --git a/lib/xe/xe_eudebug.h b/lib/xe/xe_eudebug.h
> index 6e4666333..9aadbe847 100644
> --- a/lib/xe/xe_eudebug.h
> +++ b/lib/xe/xe_eudebug.h
> @@ -150,6 +150,8 @@ void xe_eudebug_debugger_detach(struct xe_eudebug_debugger *d);
> void xe_eudebug_debugger_set_data(struct xe_eudebug_debugger *c, void *ptr);
> void xe_eudebug_debugger_add_trigger(struct xe_eudebug_debugger *d, int type,
> xe_eudebug_trigger_fn fn);
> +void xe_eudebug_debugger_remove_trigger(struct xe_eudebug_debugger *d, int type,
> + xe_eudebug_trigger_fn fn);
> void xe_eudebug_debugger_signal_stage(struct xe_eudebug_debugger *d, uint64_t stage);
> void xe_eudebug_debugger_wait_stage(struct xe_eudebug_session *s, uint64_t stage);
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online.c b/tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online.c
> index 01ccf45eb..0ef0d8093 100644
> --- a/tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online.c
> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online.c
> @@ -1785,6 +1785,12 @@ static void eu_attention_debugger_detach_trigger(struct xe_eudebug_debugger *d,
> d->fd = ret;
> d->target_pid = c_pid;
>
> + /* Discovery worker will replay events that have occurred, which leads to
> + * a vm event being sent and vm_open_trigger being re-run, which would lead
> + * to us trying to open a removed vm. Thus, remove this trigger from list.
> + */
> + xe_eudebug_debugger_remove_trigger(d, DRM_XE_EUDEBUG_EVENT_VM, vm_open_trigger);
> +
Sounds fine for me. Let split this change into two patches, one for lib other for the test.
Regards,
Dominik
> /* Let the discovery worker discover resources */
> sleep(2);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-24 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-24 11:29 [PATCH i-g-t v1] /tests/intel/xe_eudebug_online: Remove vm_open_trigger on debugger reattachment Jan Sokolowski
2024-10-24 11:40 ` Grzegorzek, Dominik [this message]
2024-10-24 12:59 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2024-10-24 14:19 ` ✗ CI.xeBAT: " Patchwork
2024-10-25 15:06 ` ✗ CI.xeFULL: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=de2dfcd96e63597e4eb6ed6a44089195bc2d2923.camel@intel.com \
--to=dominik.grzegorzek@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jan.sokolowski@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox