Hello,

Regression reported by CI have nothing to do with my patch. Similar failures are seen already earlier:

http://gfx-ci.igk.intel.com/cibuglog-ng/results/all?query_key=9b320f08684c4d11aa04576ca3f00680be33ddb5

Can you please re-report so I can get also results from shards.

Thank you in advance,

Jouni Högander
 
On Thu, 2023-11-23 at 12:05 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
Patch Details
Series: tests/kms_addfb_basic: Skip not relevant subtests for Xe
URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/126820/
State: failure
Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10253/index.html

CI Bug Log - changes from IGT_7598 -> IGTPW_10253

Summary

FAILURE

Serious unknown changes coming with IGTPW_10253 absolutely need to be
verified manually.

If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in IGTPW_10253, please notify your bug team (lgci.bug.filing@intel.com) to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

External URL: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10253/index.html

Participating hosts (38 -> 36)

Additional (1): bat-kbl-2
Missing (3): bat-mtlp-8 bat-adlp-11 fi-snb-2520m

Possible new issues

Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in IGTPW_10253:

IGT changes

Possible regressions

Known issues

Here are the changes found in IGTPW_10253 that come from known issues:

IGT changes

Issues hit

Possible fixes

{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

Build changes

CI-20190529: 20190529
CI_DRM_13914: 0b1d4056dbe497edc6d866ca5b3f54c5927bd7c0 @ git://anongit.freedesktop.org/gfx-ci/linux
IGTPW_10253: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_10253/index.html
IGT_7598: 6be4fb999857e135d54a6643a57dfe394e9c6f2e @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git