From: "Bernatowicz, Marcin" <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
To: Jakub Kolakowski <jakub1.kolakowski@intel.com>,
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Adam Miszczak <adam.miszczak@linux.intel.com>,
Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/igt_pm: Introduce helper to check for PM capability
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:30:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e41cdd6b-7e95-4957-9a98-8420fffe684a@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250311170144.602535-2-jakub1.kolakowski@intel.com>
On 3/11/2025 6:01 PM, Jakub Kolakowski wrote:
> Add power management capability checking helper. With this helper one
> can make sure the capability is present on device under test before
> proceeding with any actions related to PM.
Maybe mention that it's PCI Power Managment capability, something like:
"Introduce igt_pm_has_pm_capability(), a helper function to check
whether a PCI device supports the PCI Power Management (PM) capability. ..."
This is mainly aimed to check
> for availability of D-states but overall it checks for the PCI
> capability in general.
I would drop this statement, the helper does not explicitly verify
support for specific D-states (to check for specific D-state
availability, the Power Management Control/Status Register (PMCSR) must
be examined). Also, the phrase "checks for the PCI capability in
general" is vague.
>
> Cc: Adam Miszczak <adam.miszczak@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Lukasz Laguna <lukasz.laguna@intel.com>
> Cc: Marcin Bernatowicz <marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kolakowski <jakub1.kolakowski@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/igt_pm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/igt_pm.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/igt_pm.c b/lib/igt_pm.c
> index 1a5d9c42b..21e3137ab 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_pm.c
> +++ b/lib/igt_pm.c
> @@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
> #include "igt_pm.h"
> #include "igt_aux.h"
> #include "igt_sysfs.h"
> +#include "igt_pci.h"
>
> /**
> * SECTION:igt_pm
> @@ -81,6 +82,7 @@ enum {
> #define MAX_POLICY_STRLEN strlen(MAX_PERFORMANCE_STR)
> /* Root Port bus can have max 32 dev and each dev can have max 8 func */
> #define MAX_PCI_DEVICES 256
> +#define PCI_PM_CAP_ID 0x01
> int8_t *__sata_pm_policies;
> int __scsi_host_cnt;
>
> @@ -1470,3 +1472,21 @@ void igt_pm_ignore_slpc_efficient_freq(int i915, int gtfd, bool val)
> igt_require(igt_sysfs_has_attr(gtfd, "slpc_ignore_eff_freq"));
> igt_sysfs_set_u32(gtfd, "slpc_ignore_eff_freq", val);
> }
> +
> +
> +/**
> + * igt_is_pm_supported:
> + * @dev: pci device
> + *
> + * Returns: True if power management capability is present, otherwise false
Indicate it's PCI capability: "Returns: true if the device has PCI Power
Management capability, false otherwise."
> + */
> +bool igt_is_pm_supported(struct pci_device *pci_dev)
Shouldn't the function name start with igt_pm_ ?
Maybe igt_pm_has_pm_capability(...) ?
> +{
> + int offset;
> +
> + offset = find_pci_cap_offset(pci_dev, PCI_PM_CAP_ID);
> + if (offset > 0)
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
return (offset > 0);
> +}
> \ No newline at end of file
> diff --git a/lib/igt_pm.h b/lib/igt_pm.h
> index 6b428f53e..befb61f3c 100644
> --- a/lib/igt_pm.h
> +++ b/lib/igt_pm.h
> @@ -97,5 +97,6 @@ uint64_t igt_pm_get_runtime_suspended_time(struct pci_device *pci_dev);
> uint64_t igt_pm_get_runtime_active_time(struct pci_device *pci_dev);
> int igt_pm_get_runtime_usage(struct pci_device *pci_dev);
> void igt_pm_ignore_slpc_efficient_freq(int i915, int gtfd, bool val);
> +bool igt_is_pm_supported(struct pci_device *pci_dev);
>
> #endif /* IGT_PM_H */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-13 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-11 17:01 [PATCH i-g-t 0/2] Add a check for power management PCI capability Jakub Kolakowski
2025-03-11 17:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 1/2] lib/igt_pm: Introduce helper to check for PM capability Jakub Kolakowski
2025-03-13 10:30 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin [this message]
2025-03-13 11:12 ` Kamil Konieczny
2025-03-11 17:01 ` [PATCH i-g-t 2/2] tests/intel/xe_pm: Add a check for power management capability Jakub Kolakowski
2025-03-13 10:33 ` Bernatowicz, Marcin
2025-03-12 4:49 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for Add a check for power management PCI capability Patchwork
2025-03-12 5:03 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2025-03-12 20:13 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e41cdd6b-7e95-4957-9a98-8420fffe684a@linux.intel.com \
--to=marcin.bernatowicz@linux.intel.com \
--cc=adam.miszczak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jakub1.kolakowski@intel.com \
--cc=lukasz.laguna@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox