Hello All,

There is no way possible regressions here could be related to my patch. The patch is modifying kms_vrr clean up. Setups reporting possible failure are either skipping kms_vrr completely or not running it at all.

BR,

Jouni Högander

On Fri, 2024-11-15 at 01:01 +0000, Patchwork wrote:
Patch Details
Series: tests/kms_vrr: Set VRR_ENABLED property as false for non-VRR panel as well
URL: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/141351/
State: failure
Details: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/intel-xe/IGTPW_12105/index.html

CI Bug Log - changes from XEIGT_8110_full -> XEIGTPW_12105_full

Summary

FAILURE

Serious unknown changes coming with XEIGTPW_12105_full absolutely need to be
verified manually.

If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the changes
introduced in XEIGTPW_12105_full, please notify your bug team (I915-ci-infra@lists.freedesktop.org) to allow them
to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false positives in CI.

Participating hosts (4 -> 4)

No changes in participating hosts

Possible new issues

Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in XEIGTPW_12105_full:

IGT changes

Possible regressions

Known issues

Here are the changes found in XEIGTPW_12105_full that come from known issues:

IGT changes

Issues hit

Possible fixes

Warnings

{name}: This element is suppressed. This means it is ignored when computing
the status of the difference (SUCCESS, WARNING, or FAILURE).

Build changes

IGTPW_12105: 12105
IGT_8110: 868b25a05a9492a99228d798c6f71bea5ceaa6e1 @ https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/igt-gpu-tools.git
xe-2226-a03ca0a62967eea85aedea158db9dc5078496d4d: a03ca0a62967eea85aedea158db9dc5078496d4d
xe-2227-1e3f4084e4e1fba8d172be0c2b964ab5c816394d: 1e3f4084e4e1fba8d172be0c2b964ab5c816394d