From: "Anirban, Sk" <sk.anirban@intel.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>, <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>, <badal.nilawar@intel.com>,
<riana.tauro@intel.com>, <karthik.poosa@intel.com>,
<raag.jadav@intel.com>, <soham.purkait@intel.com>,
<mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com>, <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/intel/xe_pm_residency: Fix suspend duration calculation
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 15:11:07 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9e96a80-5a0f-4aad-8b29-e5ff9fd09ddb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a59e6c3b70eccfa43a5902bb089f9e799b1df68a@intel.com>
Hi,
On 23-03-2026 03:00 pm, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Mar 2026, Sk Anirban <sk.anirban@intel.com> wrote:
>> Fix the unit mismatch caused by interpreting seconds as milliseconds
>> during suspend duration calculations. Apply MSEC_PER_SEC multiplier
>> to ensure correct unit handling.
>>
> Fixes: ?
The change is a part of test gap which is filed internally.
Thanks,
Anirban
>
>> Signed-off-by: Sk Anirban <sk.anirban@intel.com>
>> ---
>> tests/intel/xe_pm_residency.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_pm_residency.c b/tests/intel/xe_pm_residency.c
>> index 61b63ed4f..46718a444 100644
>> --- a/tests/intel/xe_pm_residency.c
>> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_pm_residency.c
>> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static void test_idle_residency(int fd, int gt, enum test_type flag)
>> * elapsed time during suspend is approximately equal to autoresume delay
>> * when a full suspend cycle(SUSPEND_TEST_NONE) is used.
>> */
>> - elapsed_ms = igt_get_autoresume_delay(SUSPEND_STATE_FREEZE);
>> + elapsed_ms = igt_get_autoresume_delay(SUSPEND_STATE_FREEZE) * MSEC_PER_SEC;
>> residency_start = read_idle_residency(fd, gt);
>> igt_system_suspend_autoresume(SUSPEND_STATE_FREEZE, SUSPEND_TEST_NONE);
>> residency_end = read_idle_residency(fd, gt);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-23 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-23 7:02 [PATCH] tests/intel/xe_pm_residency: Fix suspend duration calculation Sk Anirban
2026-03-23 9:30 ` Jani Nikula
2026-03-23 9:41 ` Anirban, Sk [this message]
2026-03-23 9:54 ` Jani Nikula
2026-03-23 9:58 ` Anirban, Sk
2026-03-23 14:12 ` Kamil Konieczny
2026-03-23 10:01 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-03-23 14:36 ` Anirban, Sk
2026-03-23 15:43 ` Ville Syrjälä
2026-03-23 13:32 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2026-03-23 15:46 ` ✗ i915.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2026-03-23 18:35 ` ✓ Xe.CI.FULL: success " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9e96a80-5a0f-4aad-8b29-e5ff9fd09ddb@intel.com \
--to=sk.anirban@intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.gupta@intel.com \
--cc=badal.nilawar@intel.com \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=karthik.poosa@intel.com \
--cc=mallesh.koujalagi@intel.com \
--cc=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=riana.tauro@intel.com \
--cc=soham.purkait@intel.com \
--cc=vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox