Igt-dev Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Naladala, Ramanaidu" <ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com>
To: <igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests/kms_vrr: Update LOBF test to resuse the existing logic
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2024 01:18:08 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ead32894-2797-4b9c-bfca-9469248d6e8c@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240913065616.326959-1-jeevan.b@intel.com>

Hi Jeevan,

On 9/13/2024 12:26 PM, Jeevan B wrote:
> Removed the test_lobf function and used test_basic instead to simplify
> the code. Improved validation and error messages to make LOBF testing
> more reliable.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeevan B <jeevan.b@intel.com>
> ---
>   tests/kms_vrr.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/kms_vrr.c b/tests/kms_vrr.c
> index 36a22eebe..5d9b321d3 100644
> --- a/tests/kms_vrr.c
> +++ b/tests/kms_vrr.c
> @@ -640,7 +640,7 @@ test_basic(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags)
>   			     (range.max + 5), rate[0], result);
>   	}
>   
> -	if (flags & ~(TEST_NEGATIVE | TEST_MAXMIN)) {
> +	if (flags & ~(TEST_NEGATIVE | TEST_MAXMIN | TEST_LINK_OFF)) {
>   		rate[0] = vtest_ns.rate_ns;
>   		result = flip_and_measure(data, output, pipe, rate, 1, data->duration_ns);
>   		igt_assert_f(result > 75,
> @@ -656,16 +656,24 @@ test_basic(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags)
>   			     (range.min - 10), rate[0], result);
>   	}
>   
> -	if (flags & TEST_MAXMIN) {
> +	if (flags & (TEST_MAXMIN | TEST_LINK_OFF)) {
>   		unsigned int range_min =
>   			/* For Intel h/w tweak the min rate, as h/w will terminate the vblank at Vmax. */
>   			is_intel_device(data->drm_fd) ? (range.min + 2) : range.min;
>   		uint64_t maxmin_rates[] = {vtest_ns.max, rate_from_refresh(range_min)};
>   
>   		result = flip_and_measure(data, output, pipe, maxmin_rates, 2, data->duration_ns);
> -		igt_assert_f(result > 75,
> -			     "Refresh rates (%u/%u Hz) %"PRIu64"ns/%"PRIu64"ns: Target VRR on threshold not reached, result was %u%%\n",
> -			     range.max, range_min, maxmin_rates[0], maxmin_rates[1], result);
> +
> +		if (flags & TEST_LINK_OFF)
> +			igt_assert_f(igt_get_i915_edp_lobf_status(data->drm_fd, output->name),
> +				     "LOBF not enabled\n");
> +		else
> +			igt_assert_f(result > 75,
> +				     "Refresh rates (%u/%u Hz) %"PRIu64"ns/%"PRIu64"ns: Target "
> +				     "VRR on threshold not reached, result was %u%%\n",
> +				     range.max, range_min, maxmin_rates[0], maxmin_rates[1],
> +				     result);
> +
>   		return;
>   	}
>   
> @@ -796,27 +804,6 @@ test_seamless_virtual_rr_basic(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *outpu
>    * (Set Context Latency + Guardband) > (First SDP Position + Wake Time)
>    * one the depends patches are merged please fix this function.
>    */
> -
> -static void
> -test_lobf(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags)
> -{
> -	uint64_t rate[] = {0};
> -
> -	rate[0] = rate_from_refresh(data->switch_modes[HIGH_RR_MODE].vrefresh);
> -	prepare_test(data, output, pipe);
> -
> -	igt_info("LOBF test execution on %s, PIPE %s with VRR range: (%u-%u) Hz\n",
> -		 output->name, kmstest_pipe_name(pipe), data->range.min, data->range.max);
> -
> -	igt_output_override_mode(output, &data->switch_modes[HIGH_RR_MODE]);
> -	flip_and_measure(data, output, pipe, rate, 1, TEST_DURATION_NS);
> -	igt_output_override_mode(output, &data->switch_modes[LOW_RR_MODE]);
> -	rate[0] = rate_from_refresh(data->switch_modes[LOW_RR_MODE].vrefresh);
> -	flip_and_measure(data, output, pipe, rate, 1, NSECS_PER_SEC);
> -	igt_assert_f(igt_get_i915_edp_lobf_status(data->drm_fd, output->name),
> -		     "LOBF not enabled\n");
> -}
> -
>   static void
>   test_cmrr(data_t *data, enum pipe pipe, igt_output_t *output, uint32_t flags)
>   {
> @@ -1098,12 +1085,16 @@ igt_main_args("drs:", long_opts, help_str, opt_handler, &data)
>   			run_vrr_test(&data, test_cmrr, TEST_CMRR);
>   		}
>   
> +		/* FIXME: test_lobf : Lobf can be enabled when
> +		 * (Set Context Latency + Guardband) > (First SDP Position + Wake Time)
> +		 * one the depends patches are merged please fix this function.
> +		 */
>   		igt_describe("Test to validate the link-off between active frames in "
>   			     "non-PSR operation.");
>   		igt_subtest_with_dynamic("lobf") {
>   			igt_require(intel_display_ver(intel_get_drm_devid(data.drm_fd)) >= 20);

Add a check for Aux-less ALPM status. If it is disabled, LOBF will not 
be enabled.

As per bspec https://gfxspecs.intel.com/Predator/Home/Index/71041. LOBF 
can only be enabled with a fixed refresh rate (Vmin = Vmax = Flipline) 
Add a check for this Restriction.

>   
> -			run_vrr_test(&data, test_lobf, TEST_LINK_OFF);
> +			run_vrr_test(&data, test_basic, TEST_LINK_OFF);
>   		}
>   	}
>   


      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-09-19 19:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-13  6:56 [PATCH] tests/kms_vrr: Update LOBF test to resuse the existing logic Jeevan B
2024-09-13  8:40 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for " Patchwork
2024-09-13  8:49 ` ✗ CI.xeBAT: " Patchwork
2024-09-13 21:06 ` ✓ CI.xeFULL: success " Patchwork
2024-09-19  8:07 ` [PATCH] " Reddy Guddati, Santhosh
2024-09-19 19:48 ` Naladala, Ramanaidu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ead32894-2797-4b9c-bfca-9469248d6e8c@intel.com \
    --to=ramanaidu.naladala@intel.com \
    --cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox