Re: [PATCH i-g-t v6 5/9] tests/intel/xe_madvise: Add dontneed-after-mmap subtest

["Yadav, Arvind" <arvind.yadav@intel.com>]

On 06-04-2026 19:03, Sharma, Nishit wrote:
>
> On 3/25/2026 6:14 PM, Arvind Yadav wrote:
>> This test verifies that an existing mmap becomes invalid after the BO
>> is marked as purgeable and purged. The test creates a BO, maps it,
>> writes data, then marks it DONTNEED and triggers memory pressure.
>> Accessing the previously valid mapping should now trigger SIGBUS or
>> SIGSEGV, confirming that existing mappings are correctly invalidated
>> when the backing store is purged.
>>
>> v4:
>>    - Added proper resource cleanup before calling igt_skip(). (Nishit)
>>    - Added assertion for xe_bo_map. (Nishit)
>>
>> v6:
>>    - Fix sigsetjmp(jmp, SIGBUS | SIGSEGV) to sigsetjmp(jmp, 1). The
>>      second argument is a plain boolean savemask, not a signal set.
>>
>> Cc: Nishit Sharma <nishit.sharma@intel.com>
>> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Himal Prasad Ghimiray <himal.prasad.ghimiray@intel.com>
>> Cc: Pravalika Gurram <pravalika.gurram@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   tests/intel/xe_madvise.c | 64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 64 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/intel/xe_madvise.c b/tests/intel/xe_madvise.c
>> index 81e05b6d4..9a157de1d 100644
>> --- a/tests/intel/xe_madvise.c
>> +++ b/tests/intel/xe_madvise.c
>> @@ -244,6 +244,64 @@ static void test_dontneed_before_mmap(int fd)
>>       xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
>>   }
>>   +/**
>> + * SUBTEST: dontneed-after-mmap
>> + * Description: Mark BO as DONTNEED after mmap, verify SIGBUS on 
>> accessing purged mapping
>> + * Test category: functionality test
>> + */
>> +static void test_dontneed_after_mmap(int fd)
>> +{
>> +    uint32_t bo, vm;
>> +    uint64_t addr = PURGEABLE_ADDR;
>> +    size_t bo_size = PURGEABLE_BO_SIZE;
>> +    void *map;
>> +
>> +    purgeable_setup_simple_bo(fd, &vm, &bo, addr, bo_size, true);
>> +
>> +    map = xe_bo_map(fd, bo, bo_size);
>> +    igt_assert(map != MAP_FAILED);
>> +    memset(map, 0xAB, bo_size);
>> +
>> +    if (!purgeable_mark_and_verify_purged(fd, vm, addr, bo_size)) {
> same comment as in Patch-4/9


Noted.

Thanks,
Arvind

>> +        munmap(map, bo_size);
>> +        gem_close(fd, bo);
>> +        xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
>> +        igt_skip("Unable to induce purge on this platform/config");
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    /* Access purged mapping - should trigger SIGBUS/SIGSEGV */
>> +    {
>> +        sighandler_t old_sigsegv, old_sigbus;
>> +        char *ptr = (char *)map;
>> +        int sig;
>> +
>> +        old_sigsegv = signal(SIGSEGV, (__sighandler_t)sigtrap);
>> +        old_sigbus = signal(SIGBUS, (__sighandler_t)sigtrap);
>> +
>> +        sig = sigsetjmp(jmp, 1); /* savemask=1: save/restore signal 
>> mask */
>> +        switch (sig) {
>> +        case SIGBUS:
>> +        case SIGSEGV:
>> +            /* Expected - purged mapping access failed */
>> +            break;
>> +        case 0:
>> +            *ptr = 0;
>> +        default:
>> +            igt_assert_f(false,
>> +                     "Access to purged mapping should trigger 
>> SIGBUS, got sig=%d\n",
>> +                     sig);
>> +            break;
>> +        }
>> +
>> +        signal(SIGBUS, old_sigbus);
>> +        signal(SIGSEGV, old_sigsegv);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    munmap(map, bo_size);
>> +    gem_close(fd, bo);
>> +    xe_vm_destroy(fd, vm);
>> +}
>> +
>>   int igt_main()
>>   {
>>       struct drm_xe_engine_class_instance *hwe;
>> @@ -268,6 +326,12 @@ int igt_main()
>>               break;
>>           }
>>   +    igt_subtest("dontneed-after-mmap")
>> +        xe_for_each_engine(fd, hwe) {
>> +            test_dontneed_after_mmap(fd);
>> +            break;
>> +        }
>> +
>>       igt_fixture() {
>>           xe_device_put(fd);
>>           drm_close_driver(fd);