From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>, Andi Shyti <andi@etezian.org>
Cc: igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [igt-dev] [Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_exec_nop: Keep a copy of the names
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 13:21:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fd22de9d-05cc-81f2-7957-a006fc685af2@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <158142634160.2303.16060810217569990410@skylake-alporthouse-com>
On 11/02/2020 13:05, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2020-02-11 13:00:19)
>>
>> On 11/02/2020 10:37, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> Quoting Andi Shyti (2020-02-11 00:42:55)
>>>> Hi Chris,
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:37:42AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>>>> The engine names are now stored inside the iterator and not as static
>>>>> strings. If we wish to use them later, we need to make a copy.
>>>>
>>>> But we are not using them later. Your patch just copies and frees
>>>> an array.
>>>
>>> They are used inside an igt_info() in the child processes. Output at the
>>> moment is quite strange.
>>
>> I also don't get this - child has a copy of everything how can it not work?
>
> A copy of what? The intel_engine_data is scoped to the for_each_engine
> loop. We're leaking pointers to locations on stack, so they get
> clobbered and we print garbage in %s.
I misread the the patch while glancing it as forking being done inside
the for_engine_loop.
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Regards,
Tvrtko
_______________________________________________
igt-dev mailing list
igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-11 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-11 0:37 [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_exec_nop: Keep a copy of the names Chris Wilson
2020-02-11 0:42 ` [Intel-gfx] " Andi Shyti
2020-02-11 10:37 ` [igt-dev] " Chris Wilson
2020-02-11 13:00 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2020-02-11 13:05 ` Chris Wilson
2020-02-11 13:21 ` Tvrtko Ursulin [this message]
2020-02-11 1:36 ` [igt-dev] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for " Patchwork
2020-02-12 13:52 ` [igt-dev] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fd22de9d-05cc-81f2-7957-a006fc685af2@linux.intel.com \
--to=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@etezian.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=igt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox