From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@mailbox.org>
To: Rain Yang <jiyu.yang@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@nxp.com, conor+dt@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, festevam@gmail.com,
imx@lists.linux.dev, jiyu.yang@nxp.com, kernel@pengutronix.de,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, liviu.dudau@arm.com,
robh@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, shawnguo@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx95: remove CLK_GPUAPB
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 14:53:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0de33175-1dc3-417b-8dab-9b57940f0789@mailbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aVegAt002L20oBGf@oss.nxp.com>
On 1/2/26 11:37 AM, Rain Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 01, 2026 at 05:51:12PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 1/1/26 1:37 AM, Rain Yang wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 03:11:21PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> On 12/31/25 4:19 AM, Rain Yang wrote:
>>>>> From: Rain Yang <jiyu.yang@nxp.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dropping CLK_GPUAPB simplifies OPP handling and avoids unnecessary
>>>>> complexity.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 67934f248e64 ("arm64: dts: imx95: Describe Mali G310 GPU")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Rain Yang <jiyu.yang@nxp.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi | 4 ++--
>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi
>>>>> index 88bde59e61b2..ab446aa6f73c 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx95.dtsi
>>>>> @@ -2164,8 +2164,8 @@ netc_emdio: mdio@0,0 {
>>>>> gpu: gpu@4d900000 {
>>>>> compatible = "nxp,imx95-mali", "arm,mali-valhall-csf";
>>>>> reg = <0 0x4d900000 0 0x480000>;
>>>>> - clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_GPU_CGC>, <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_GPUAPB>;
>>>>> - clock-names = "core", "coregroup";
>>>>> + clocks = <&scmi_clk IMX95_CLK_GPU_CGC>;
>>>>> + clock-names = "core";
>>>>
>>>> I don't think this is correct, SM can disable the GPUAPB clock from the SM
>>>> monitor:
>>>>
>>>>> $ clock.w gpuapb off
>>>>
>>>> Linux has to make sure the GPUAPB clock are enabled to access the GPU
>>>> register, hence the clock have to be described in DT.
>>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> Hello Jiyu,
>>
>>> CLK_GPU and CLK_GPUAPB can only be controlled internally by the SM, not by Linux.
>>> CLK_GPUAPB always runs at a fixed frequency, does not require dynamic adjustment,
>>> and is practically always on.
>>> Additionally, CLK_GPUAPB's frequency is absent from all OPP entries. Removing it
>>> could simplify OPP handling logic and reduce unnecessary complexity.
>>
>> But the SM can turn the GPUAPB clock off, correct ?
>>
>> Linux has to be able to turn GPUAPB clock on, therefore the GPUAPB clock have
>> to be described in DT, correct ?
>
> Yes, CLK_GPUAPB can be turned off by the SM, but by default it remains on, just like
> CLK_GPU. AFAIK, there is no scenario where either of these clocks could or would be
> disabled in both SM and Linux.
>
> If enabling or disabling CLK_GPUAPB in Linux was wanted, the same shall apply to CLK_GPU
> to make this approach reasonable.
> Also, OPP framework shall be adjusted to meet these changes too.
You can not depend on the state in which bootloader or any other prior
stage left the platform. If the clock can be turned off, you must make
sure they are turned on for correct hardware operation.
CLK_GPU is enabled as parent clock of CLK_GPUCGC already.
I don't understand your concerns about the OPP framework, this keeps
coming up in the discussion one way or the other, but it is not clear to
me what this is about. Can you elaborate on the OPP framework concern ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-02 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-31 3:19 [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx95: remove CLK_GPUAPB Rain Yang
2025-12-31 14:11 ` Marek Vasut
2026-01-01 0:37 ` Rain Yang
2026-01-01 16:51 ` Marek Vasut
2026-01-02 10:37 ` Rain Yang
2026-01-02 13:53 ` Marek Vasut [this message]
2026-01-05 2:19 ` Rain Yang
2026-01-05 16:31 ` Marek Vasut
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0de33175-1dc3-417b-8dab-9b57940f0789@mailbox.org \
--to=marek.vasut@mailbox.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jiyu.yang@nxp.com \
--cc=jiyu.yang@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox