From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC680221DBF; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:35:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739198107; cv=none; b=c+vzUj70rOSHajtTtto+RxTFL/8+mZG6mEI8MCi8ZFn6fni2hJmg5dLmj1YxmlykiuplUdcDy0nB3o56UI3uG3dD9bZTKzZjhx1cDeYN/r07Z81JAOV9S7aD7vJRcz8jI+3DmB9jkqRlGcgTk4qiYEHhTy5aYGwQgy/MgOCi4TY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739198107; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Co8afiWugpJkabF78b8GJNpLEF4rbBHfjLyesRenPLw=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=b10+NdwgEFtHSxVs2NWylpxwww2serLX8k/dKE+FgSm//c2kO1LV7Rofjd5TxBvGnoVzkyr8xx8jEmYDU/Dx+atFY36D5QqxJyHs6WwxRCPClnNI1oINAOX6dsM1RZQA+T7UvziKwiayE3BDc+lDai5Fzl09lYzuI3cr1l1EW2g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Q2ByZBVI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Q2ByZBVI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4BA3C4CED1; Mon, 10 Feb 2025 14:35:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739198107; bh=Co8afiWugpJkabF78b8GJNpLEF4rbBHfjLyesRenPLw=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=Q2ByZBVI5UElkc96ZQaupz7Ackk97ET2SNOfhgtjjW7KILMyaMP/shtmN7600tLKA mXYiC5YTOStx0adGhRsqeHVouxAql6NZJwLkx+jF03TcQNHiFRIqOgsuAzTxMRXSDy vyaRQ4CzQUoAgQgbJvsWbS+Gq9/UbrtOJHq3tuht3e/pq+H538VDlqFqIleLA/2LqV VklIpdIYYZDV+ETmBOcL7qo5hgYl8y1S0MA0WcoD5q6Ze1SUXw51iaqLe48IerwxV+ FjGakSc3xITmst8XsUV6aMp+mfY3FgNzHYmuRG4b19TcPN1TIx0el022T399usnuAO ScNx3ym0OXt7A== From: Vinod Koul To: Paul Cercueil , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Andy Shevchenko Cc: Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam In-Reply-To: <20241008173351.2246796-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> References: <20241008173351.2246796-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] dmaengine: dma_request_chan*() amendments Message-Id: <173919810428.71959.10040102676409346998.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:05:04 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: imx@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.14.2 On Tue, 08 Oct 2024 20:27:43 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Reduce the scope of the use of some rarely used DMA request channel APIs > in order to make the step of their removal or making static in the > future. No functional changes intended. > > In v2: > - updated the commit messages (Frank) > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/4] dmaengine: Replace dma_request_slave_channel() by dma_request_chan() commit: 31d43141d13aa63587f140884b1f667800ce4e1d [2/4] dmaengine: Use dma_request_channel() instead of __dma_request_channel() commit: 1c83d3dfa0905590408595560629627cba4f9261 [3/4] dmaengine: Add a comment on why it's okay when kasprintf() fails commit: 1722fb4a1307748f983c1345c4c24178d8e0be47 [4/4] dmaengine: Unify checks in dma_request_chan() commit: 91d8560c15918c7d44e4f665fac829ba8057a2f3 Best regards, -- ~Vinod