From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f171.google.com (mail-pl1-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B99CF14D428 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2024 06:09:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.171 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731305352; cv=none; b=PjoCFmaGKOJJ3hjPVna9BTUC1gF3sUqmAvkcmBLsIyItovoyW4WC6queBkOnevXFbeix1rWWkBca9E0+PFSOS9wwwXCl3/TmVRHxYTTzdxuuq3vmvGfb4f7vxmXc1lOz/LJXU83MhyJBnL812LdeAO6TSiBTxxwjppSHEkwD7xE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1731305352; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Y+YcqdGqf+OGKcdRrC+abbyhOx97TLTW0GMdmUmwMpg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DxAO+w6rqUfXJL2KVnK5wt0H18oJC9JrqsuDHXriOTNlh8xoJh/0O6vmvhBx5O0thGL1RqecxbiWGXRpJCcWSYVNWcfWkkrG4W8FF9YZZrBBbPyk4fM6K6PUDvCUVR9sTmXJsI4TjHXo5eNO3f2zp7t9AkTgg/02X4FUItRsjMQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b=zaRZKho/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="zaRZKho/" Received: by mail-pl1-f171.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20c803787abso33454655ad.0 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 22:09:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; t=1731305350; x=1731910150; darn=lists.linux.dev; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qkxZN5YdgAuoqBMpfCPX8HcOfpXqfkrH2t/OYEck+/8=; b=zaRZKho/MEViDzrwvUgDfhmidAakwxIKkRmi6bcuywt9H2jVEaUR23CH0qdH9NcqlR 3iAYQw4I9vu/N8CPaN7u3nbeK8bhqcx8o6mJt2wluRyexkjke5yOBUAQ8yBlios9ma7r aEQX3jB8mIsZb5N78q4sUrlnm/qC9sHzx9zlwxKzOuoog2gr4LVfLGkKqNLRjbsEfCBO rjYj47rniy9iHHEvUplmOPQadeqgWtaH4OxleNt8pL1B2KHQHP6ltBkiXCNdAwCrPBcO f9zqmCHC/zz/HsbTpFeVScKy2k11PIydj4YMK5agG3s3x5RdZl5ldpgledDMVoqYG3r3 kd5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731305350; x=1731910150; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=qkxZN5YdgAuoqBMpfCPX8HcOfpXqfkrH2t/OYEck+/8=; b=ahT5YZS2y5oEuuVJwOj+YnxuvtI+Cccc9K/Ba93RWaVap7NMaY9dOHVFfVzwW25Sys iIpAhZbtjduajUmiHlwYwJXua1oUWKVX4qj1KP0ra5IfcKSodn3Mhmhh+s1CMVc3wFOO ZmiRczKJAEcC/wcm7cE3FCEtA4QS7j67lkx7e9Z1eaA8zkZR024DHZdb0pDW/aLWyTeL k3UQqC7spL1oiV9q4wqxqH6Vgn9yOR/pdKvDXRVhAAh54a1kzylVfi1P//LOa7o9MeTO DpCfUkk8t6DoGPUdjUiLlVi36gVYHf02pE2QjAvq3rzCjsY350eZiPxlKrsIDj84IxwE ZN+Q== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWl1n8dNOGUfniYWxFUY+dfHee+u+pUUitYwRBWexPfKmcq7rKqMrma+y6I1DrTw8KSK3c=@lists.linux.dev X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwFPLK2ao0Cpwnk2TQ1HAs2UDwX9M5NPLWR0aaFMe5c7fnAWfAP GMetR7rR8Wzul8gaAEXp69WmLoV2xXTZmMBue5D7k+9TvxGN7FHFKoGJyB6zWQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEl6gQgVgwKnj6tE3Fweh981irdtgKxjVaL3Zp4fjV5+8vkkGC4Z/QsrLc4gCH0NjBzR+4oiw== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:1c2:b0:205:7007:84fa with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-211837c3ddemr194720175ad.28.1731305349913; Sun, 10 Nov 2024 22:09:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from thinkpad ([117.193.211.140]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-21177e4205esm68869915ad.151.2024.11.10.22.09.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 10 Nov 2024 22:09:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:39:02 +0530 From: Manivannan Sadhasivam To: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Richard Zhu , jingoohan1@gmail.com, bhelgaas@google.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, robh@kernel.org, frank.li@nxp.com, imx@lists.linux.dev, kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PCI: dwc: Clean up some unnecessary codes in dw_pcie_suspend_noirq() Message-ID: <20241111060902.mdbksegqj5rblqsn@thinkpad> References: <20241107111334.n23ebkbs3uhxivvm@thinkpad> <20241108002425.GA1631063@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: imx@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20241108002425.GA1631063@bhelgaas> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 06:24:25PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 11:13:34AM +0000, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 04:44:55PM +0800, Richard Zhu wrote: > > > Before sending PME_TURN_OFF, don't test the LTSSM stat. Since it's > > > safe to send PME_TURN_OFF message regardless of whether the link > > > is up or down. So, there would be no need to test the LTSSM stat > > > before sending PME_TURN_OFF message. > > > > What is the incentive to send PME_Turn_Off when link is not up? > > There's no need to send PME_Turn_Off when link is not up. > > But a link-up check is inherently racy because the link may go down > between the check and the PME_Turn_Off. Since it's impossible for > software to guarantee the link is up, the Root Port should be able to > tolerate attempts to send PME_Turn_Off when the link is down. > > So IMO there's no need to check whether the link is up, and checking > gives the misleading impression that "we know the link is up and > therefore sending PME_Turn_Off is safe." > I agree that the check is racy (not sure if there is a better way to avoid that), but if you send the PME_Turn_Off unconditionally, then it will result in L23 Ready timeout and users will see the error message. > > > Remove the L2 poll too, after the PME_TURN_OFF message is sent > > > out. Because the re-initialization would be done in > > > dw_pcie_resume_noirq(). > > > > As Krishna explained, host needs to wait until the endpoint acks the > > message (just to give it some time to do cleanups). Then only the > > host can initiate D3Cold. It matters when the device supports L2. > > The important thing here is to be clear about the *reason* to poll for > L2 and the *event* that must wait for L2. > > I don't have any DesignWare specs, but when dw_pcie_suspend_noirq() > waits for DW_PCIE_LTSSM_L2_IDLE, I think what we're doing is waiting > for the link to be in the L2/L3 Ready pseudo-state (PCIe r6.0, sec > 5.2, fig 5-1). > > L2 and L3 are states where main power to the downstream component is > off, i.e., the component is in D3cold (r6.0, sec 5.3.2), so there is > no link in those states. > > The PME_Turn_Off handshake is part of the process to put the > downstream component in D3cold. I think the reason for this handshake > is to allow an orderly shutdown of that component before main power is > removed. > > When the downstream component receives PME_Turn_Off, it will stop > scheduling new TLPs, but it may already have TLPs scheduled but not > yet sent. If power were removed immediately, they would be lost. My > understanding is that the link will not enter L2/L3 Ready until the > components on both ends have completed whatever needs to be done with > those TLPs. (This is based on the L2/L3 discussion in the Mindshare > PCIe book; I haven't found clear spec citations for all of it.) > > I think waiting for L2/L3 Ready is to keep us from turning off main > power when the components are still trying to dispose of those TLPs. > Not just disposing TLPs as per the spec, most endpoints also need to reset their state machine as well (if there is a way for the endpoint sw to delay sending L23 Ready). > So I think every controller that turns off main power needs to wait > for L2/L3 Ready. > > There's also a requirement that software wait at least 100 ns after > L2/L3 Ready before turning off refclock and main power (sec > 5.3.3.2.1). > Right. Usually, the delay after PERST# assert would make sure this, but in layerscape driver (user of dw_pcie_suspend_noirq) I don't see power/refclk removal. Richard Zhu/Frank, thoughts? - Mani -- மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்