From: ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com
To: haibo.chen@nxp.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, imx@lists.linux.dev,
s32@nxp.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: refactor clock loopback selection logic
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 10:55:01 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250521025502.112030-1-ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com> (raw)
From: Luke Wang <ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com>
i.MX reference manual specifies that internal clock loopback should be
used for SDR104/HS200/HS400 modes. Move ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL
configuration into the timing selection function to:
1. Explicitly set internal loopback path for SDR104/HS200/HS400 modes
2. Avoid redundant bit manipulation across multiple functions
Preserve ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL during system resume for SDIO devices
with MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER and MMC_PM_WAKE_SDIO_IRQ flag, as the controller
might lose register state during suspend while skipping card
re-initialization.
Signed-off-by: Luke Wang <ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com>
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
index 7611682f10c3..c448a53530a5 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
@@ -728,23 +728,17 @@ static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg)
writel(new_val, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC);
if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING) {
u32 v = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_AUTO_CMD_STATUS);
- u32 m = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
- if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK) {
+ if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK)
v |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
- } else {
+ else
v &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
- m &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
- }
- if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING) {
+ if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING)
v |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
- m |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
- } else {
+ else
v &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
- }
writel(v, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_AUTO_CMD_STATUS);
- writel(m, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
}
return;
case SDHCI_TRANSFER_MODE:
@@ -1082,7 +1076,6 @@ static void esdhc_reset_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host)
ctrl &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_AUTO_TUNE_EN;
if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_MAN_TUNING) {
ctrl &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
- ctrl &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
writel(ctrl, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
writel(0, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS);
} else if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING) {
@@ -1177,8 +1170,7 @@ static void esdhc_prepare_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 val)
"warning! RESET_ALL never complete before sending tuning command\n");
reg = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
- reg |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE | ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL |
- ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
+ reg |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE | ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
writel(reg, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
writel(FIELD_PREP(ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS_DLY_CELL_SET_PRE_MASK, val),
host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS);
@@ -1432,6 +1424,15 @@ static void esdhc_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned timing)
break;
}
+ if (timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104 ||
+ timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200 ||
+ timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400)
+ m |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
+ else
+ m &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
+
+ writel(m, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
+
esdhc_change_pinstate(host, timing);
}
--
2.34.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-05-21 2:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-21 2:55 ziniu.wang_1 [this message]
2025-05-21 2:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: optimize clock loopback selection with dummy pad support ziniu.wang_1
2025-05-21 16:20 ` Frank Li
2025-05-28 10:34 ` Adrian Hunter
2025-06-09 14:24 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-05-21 16:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: refactor clock loopback selection logic Frank Li
2025-05-22 3:52 ` Bough Chen
2025-05-22 3:59 ` Bough Chen
2025-05-28 10:34 ` Adrian Hunter
2025-06-09 14:24 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250521025502.112030-1-ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com \
--to=ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=s32@nxp.com \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).