imx.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com
To: haibo.chen@nxp.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
	ulf.hansson@linaro.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	s32@nxp.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: refactor clock loopback selection logic
Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 10:55:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250521025502.112030-1-ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com> (raw)

From: Luke Wang <ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com>

i.MX reference manual specifies that internal clock loopback should be
used for SDR104/HS200/HS400 modes. Move ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL
configuration into the timing selection function to:

1. Explicitly set internal loopback path for SDR104/HS200/HS400 modes
2. Avoid redundant bit manipulation across multiple functions

Preserve ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL during system resume for SDIO devices
with MMC_PM_KEEP_POWER and MMC_PM_WAKE_SDIO_IRQ flag, as the controller
might lose register state during suspend while skipping card
re-initialization.

Signed-off-by: Luke Wang <ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com>
---
 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
index 7611682f10c3..c448a53530a5 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
@@ -728,23 +728,17 @@ static void esdhc_writew_le(struct sdhci_host *host, u16 val, int reg)
 		writel(new_val, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_VENDOR_SPEC);
 		if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING) {
 			u32 v = readl(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_AUTO_CMD_STATUS);
-			u32 m = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
-			if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK) {
+			if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_TUNED_CLK)
 				v |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
-			} else {
+			else
 				v &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
-				m &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
-			}
 
-			if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING) {
+			if (val & SDHCI_CTRL_EXEC_TUNING)
 				v |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
-				m |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
-			} else {
+			else
 				v &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE;
-			}
 
 			writel(v, host->ioaddr + SDHCI_AUTO_CMD_STATUS);
-			writel(m, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
 		}
 		return;
 	case SDHCI_TRANSFER_MODE:
@@ -1082,7 +1076,6 @@ static void esdhc_reset_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host)
 		ctrl &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_AUTO_TUNE_EN;
 		if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_MAN_TUNING) {
 			ctrl &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
-			ctrl &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
 			writel(ctrl, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
 			writel(0, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS);
 		} else if (imx_data->socdata->flags & ESDHC_FLAG_STD_TUNING) {
@@ -1177,8 +1170,7 @@ static void esdhc_prepare_tuning(struct sdhci_host *host, u32 val)
 		"warning! RESET_ALL never complete before sending tuning command\n");
 
 	reg = readl(host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
-	reg |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE | ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL |
-			ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
+	reg |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_EXE_TUNE | ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_SMPCLK_SEL;
 	writel(reg, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
 	writel(FIELD_PREP(ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS_DLY_CELL_SET_PRE_MASK, val),
 	       host->ioaddr + ESDHC_TUNE_CTRL_STATUS);
@@ -1432,6 +1424,15 @@ static void esdhc_set_uhs_signaling(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned timing)
 		break;
 	}
 
+	if (timing == MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR104 ||
+	    timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS200 ||
+	    timing == MMC_TIMING_MMC_HS400)
+		m |= ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
+	else
+		m &= ~ESDHC_MIX_CTRL_FBCLK_SEL;
+
+	writel(m, host->ioaddr + ESDHC_MIX_CTRL);
+
 	esdhc_change_pinstate(host, timing);
 }
 
-- 
2.34.1


             reply	other threads:[~2025-05-21  2:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-21  2:55 ziniu.wang_1 [this message]
2025-05-21  2:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: optimize clock loopback selection with dummy pad support ziniu.wang_1
2025-05-21 16:20   ` Frank Li
2025-05-28 10:34   ` Adrian Hunter
2025-06-09 14:24   ` Ulf Hansson
2025-05-21 16:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: refactor clock loopback selection logic Frank Li
2025-05-22  3:52   ` Bough Chen
2025-05-22  3:59     ` Bough Chen
2025-05-28 10:34 ` Adrian Hunter
2025-06-09 14:24 ` Ulf Hansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250521025502.112030-1-ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com \
    --to=ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=s32@nxp.com \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).