From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay15.mail.gandi.net (relay15.mail.gandi.net [217.70.178.235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 838EC4315F for ; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:32:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.178.235 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752489174; cv=none; b=Z9al8Tm2OBy7dQFPwoTML+mzbJKgZd7iQov2B+vTtxREHqk8Ihipm/yYe7WPQPKiMBXmgdISkPEXvbgqE3iWTDiYHA81OvdKDcAyLJDfdQBFcjQ1bNOBf/4RrL8BWrqhbBRKBS95MZs5Wl3oKn3XaFX59UdEzJIPmish+u4gH3Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752489174; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QffSL3TfF1zjaW22KH4kGBcPxS1hroQimLDvpcRqTkY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=e8wocY6UcORbE2ookwb431iC/j+9ChFQwgvMmXOt9c8NUgnsa+gEX2VnLsYy1rITFv1a+cOI3yWm0odfIePYyAkzx+w9Qj9wzqO2RwQM028k8ibfYTky791yDlgSLfW1LTAYOTazUsWKT8rc6aRkl6LdqnVbcLW+7wpAzJ87b2w= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=ptl6aTRU; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.178.235 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="ptl6aTRU" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DF62543190; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 10:32:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1752489165; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VwUUlthEB0GL/tkuBikSXADM+QDOu8qT0EBANwcGFUY=; b=ptl6aTRU6q2sZbmunyCwSMALBSosgd8KoJVbC3EzqraKunIc8Bw4Tpl7qUSwGsyZvAJpaX nxMpym+ISlifa6M9yfjJNuBfLLdo8NnAo486ZnY4IyX534YPVR9/7GeHoutnlRUe8eCYoB xuOKJ8T3tP2c1OnpGLpDazsGB18BEKP0R0S1NdNt+nk8q7ZsE3QZ5jucNavPk/ZPUX1Yzi cyhzvnlezCJPyP3rz6Itw/IFMPyCvo9ivUjCAWMKzL+KgIdlSHKnXBbeUaOD7/p7zNvCWh KsDCZ4A9j6u5VXp4d0KbE/LFj1zKX/F4YKG3yWpau0gvUZeMVJ8cajQgbuMF/A== Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 12:32:40 +0200 From: Luca Ceresoli To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Andrzej Hajda , Neil Armstrong , Robert Foss , Laurent Pinchart , Jonas Karlman , Jernej Skrabec , Maarten Lankhorst , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Simona Vetter , Liu Ying , Shawn Guo , Sascha Hauer , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Fabio Estevam , Tomi Valkeinen , Philipp Zabel , Hui Pu , Thomas Petazzoni , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm/omapdrm: use drm_bridge_chain_get_last_bridge() Message-ID: <20250714123240.16d8dcb1@booty> In-Reply-To: <20250710-daffy-mini-booby-574fca@houat> References: <20250709-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-drm_bridge_get_next_bridge-v1-0-48920b9cf369@bootlin.com> <20250709-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-drm_bridge_get_next_bridge-v1-4-48920b9cf369@bootlin.com> <20250710-daffy-mini-booby-574fca@houat> Organization: Bootlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.1 (GTK 3.24.49; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: imx@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-GND-State: clean X-GND-Score: -100 X-GND-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdefgdehudejvdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfitefpfffkpdcuggftfghnshhusghstghrihgsvgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedtudenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkjghfohfogggtgfesthejredtredtvdenucfhrhhomhepnfhutggrucevvghrvghsohhlihcuoehluhgtrgdrtggvrhgvshholhhisegsohhothhlihhnrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeeglefffefghefhtddvfeeufeeiveekgffgleekieduteekkeetvdehudekgfdvvdenucffohhmrghinhepsghoohhtlhhinhdrtghomhenucfkphepvdgrtddvmeeijedtmedvtddvtdemvggrtddumegsvgegudemleehvgejmeefgeefmeeludefvgenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepihhnvghtpedvrgdtvdemieejtdemvddtvddtmegvrgdtudemsggvgedumeelhegvjeemfeegfeemledufegvpdhhvghlohepsghoohhthidpmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehluhgtrgdrtggvrhgvshholhhisegsohhothhlihhnrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopedvgedprhgtphhtthhopehmrhhiphgrrhgusehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopegrnhgurhiivghjrdhhrghjuggrsehinhhtvghlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepnhgvihhlrdgrrhhmshhtrhhonhhgsehlihhnrghro hdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehrfhhoshhssehkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopefnrghurhgvnhhtrdhpihhntghhrghrthesihguvggrshhonhgsohgrrhgurdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhonhgrsheskhifihgsohhordhsvgdprhgtphhtthhopehjvghrnhgvjhdrshhkrhgrsggvtgesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehmrggrrhhtvghnrdhlrghnkhhhohhrshhtsehlihhnuhigrdhinhhtvghlrdgtohhm Hi Maxime, On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 09:13:46 +0200 Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Wed, Jul 09, 2025 at 06:48:03PM +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > > Use drm_bridge_chain_get_last_bridge() instead of open coding a loop with > > two invocations of drm_bridge_get_next_bridge() per iteration. > > > > Besides being cleaner and more efficient, this change is necessary in > > preparation for drm_bridge_get_next_bridge() to get a reference to the > > returned bridge. > > > > Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c | 8 ++++---- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c > > index 054b71dba6a75b8c42198c4b102a093f43a675a2..3bbcec01428a6f290afdfa40ef6f79629539a584 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_drv.c > > @@ -378,12 +378,12 @@ static int omap_display_id(struct omap_dss_device *output) > > struct device_node *node = NULL; > > > > if (output->bridge) { > > - struct drm_bridge *bridge = output->bridge; > > - > > - while (drm_bridge_get_next_bridge(bridge)) > > - bridge = drm_bridge_get_next_bridge(bridge); > > + struct drm_bridge *bridge = > > + drm_bridge_chain_get_last_bridge(output->bridge->encoder); > > > > node = bridge->of_node; > > + > > + drm_bridge_put(bridge); > > Any reason you're not using __free(drm_bridge_put) here? Just because the code is simple enough that an explicit drm_bridge_put() is clearly sufficient. Do you think __free() should be used even in such trivial cases? Luca -- Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com