Re: [PATCH] Revert "ARM: dts: imx: move nand related property under nand@0"

Frank Li
2026-03-05T22:51:36Z

On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 09:37:26PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 05/03/2026 21:05, Frank Li wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 10:49:28AM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 11:53:00AM +0100, Max Krummenacher wrote:
> >>> for our NAND-based modules, and our CI no longer produces any useful
> >>> results as a consequence.
> >>>
> >>> I strongly believe that, as an immediate first step, the commit
> >>> that moved the DT NAND chip configuration into its subnode should
> >>> be reverted.
> >>
> >> As my previous said, can do partial revert? Just add back property under
> >> gpmi and keep nand@0 node.
> >>
> >> For example
> >>
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qdl-skov-cpu.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qdl-skov-cpu.dtsi
> >> @@ -260,14 +260,10 @@ fixed-link {
> >> &gpmi {
> >> pinctrl-names = "default";
> >> pinctrl-0 = <&pinctrl_gpmi_nand>;
> >> + nand-on-flash-bbt;
> >> #address-cells = <1>;
> >> #size-cells = <0>;
> >> status = "okay";
> >>
> >> Remove "- nand@0" part. You can use "git add -p" to do that.
> >
> > Do you plan rework this patch as what I said?
>
> Issue and revert were posted two weeks ago. That's maximum time to
> handle regression.

Any docuement said these maxium times, I also want to know other maximum
time, such as
what's max time maintainer need reply? Many patch is not any
reponse for long time.

Frank