From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.hugovil.com (mail.hugovil.com [162.243.120.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16E8536C5A4; Fri, 6 Mar 2026 16:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=162.243.120.170 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772816398; cv=none; b=dclplRkxsGlPXh8liGM8xZk4yL0lxvK8UOFKcxLibjFOIRxetCvleZJ1JKb8hMfoukI69cTYu13XznApaQs5PuB1XIvY33G8mlJiR1tUJ6EXctGUMgBRj5HCmyt+OjO3svjIaRjVACDKMz8ZmrsNqm1weFiOHhXY9D0M70/iDFY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772816398; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BaUIFqnOqBcDUjCktswit6PgkVFlQ7jl1n+54BMqJFQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Mime-Version: Content-Type:Subject; b=EN/kSPZj6DF2yb5rKpbU2SntPCvTjN/Vb5kVNJ2EQVlkouJIk/r730k8CeXrV3dytcAH3s+8rNDnOa4KlDUI3nOmUXg64jQE9gXwXsG5w2oRNZYo3NXhTrrpIfPsn6JJkAViSVWJvvEwBXQY5nGrZ3+INovICBt+0sddPQUKk08= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hugovil.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hugovil.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hugovil.com header.i=@hugovil.com header.b=dVEqJoFp; arc=none smtp.client-ip=162.243.120.170 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=hugovil.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=hugovil.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=hugovil.com header.i=@hugovil.com header.b="dVEqJoFp" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hugovil.com ; s=x; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Message-Id:Cc:To:From :Date:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=uDPQ4R78d4QAe2vNvQqZ27IjqiJla9qhDYNsRAF5LJc=; b=dVEqJoFp0qDkeVMViNGKW524dJ A6o5M5b6Omq4k1mD9ARkDhKxbGgz+815e+Yi++SOM7C+2Okbh4f464HKGgrI8n0/3UIH5nROyUAaY zfcei1G/cDprZ68MrTHYkU4acA8qrBirOxx5glxoD2pw8d2uXHSDFImtHqC6UIvsIEeg=; Received: from modemcable168.174-80-70.mc.videotron.ca ([70.80.174.168]:48162 helo=pettiford.lan) by mail.hugovil.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1vyYWH-0002UD-Qt; Fri, 06 Mar 2026 11:59:22 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2026 11:59:20 -0500 From: Hugo Villeneuve To: Krzysztof Kozlowski Cc: robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, andrzej.hajda@intel.com, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, rfoss@kernel.org, Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, jonas@kwiboo.se, jernej.skrabec@gmail.com, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org, tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@gmail.com, simona@ffwll.ch, Frank.Li@nxp.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de, festevam@gmail.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com, antonin.godard@bootlin.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Hugo Villeneuve Message-Id: <20260306115920.422ea4dc455cebafa8127194@hugovil.com> In-Reply-To: <20260306-observant-banana-wapiti-90adef@quoll> References: <20260305180651.1827087-1-hugo@hugovil.com> <20260305180651.1827087-5-hugo@hugovil.com> <20260306-observant-banana-wapiti-90adef@quoll> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: imx@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 70.80.174.168 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: hugo@hugovil.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.2 NICE_REPLY_A Looks like a legit reply (A) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/15] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: change incorrect VAR-SOM-MX6UL references X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Wed, 08 May 2019 21:11:16 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.hugovil.com) Hi Krzysztof, On Fri, 6 Mar 2026 09:00:18 +0100 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Thu, Mar 05, 2026 at 01:06:19PM -0500, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > > From: Hugo Villeneuve > > > > There is no Variscite module named VAR-SOM-MX6UL, but there is VAR-SOM-MX6 > > And binding does not speak about VAR-SOM-MX6UL, so I find your commit > msg extra confusing. It took me way too much time to decipher why you > are doing this and this should be just simple correction of name to > match the product expressed by compatible. Yes you are absolutely right. The origin of the confusion is that at first this patch was included with patch #3 of this serie: Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260305180651.1827087-4-hugo@hugovil.com/ [1] I split them to satisfy checkpatch for separate bindings patches, and copied the commit message from [1]. I will simplify the commit title and message in the next version to: --------------- dt-bindings: arm: fsl: fix SOM name description to match compatible Fix SOM name description to VAR-SOM-6UL to match the product expressed by compatible. --------------- > > BTW, the DTSI also has wrong name. This was fixed in patch #3 [1] just before this one. > > and also VAR-SOM-6UL, so it is confusing at first to know to which one it > > refers to. The imx6ul-var-som* dts/dtsi supports only the VAR-SOM-6UL [1], > > not VAR-SOM-MX6 [2], so modify comments and model descriptions accordingly. > > > > Link https://dev.variscite.com/var-som-6ul [1] > > Link: https://dev.variscite.com/var-som-mx6 [2] > > > > Signed-off-by: Hugo Villeneuve > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > -- Hugo Villeneuve