From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Luca Ceresoli" <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/37] drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: move drm_bridge_add() call to probe
Date: Tue, 19 May 2026 11:16:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260519111617.40BCCC2BCB3@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260519-drm-bridge-hotplug-v1-19-45e2bdb3dfb4@bootlin.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Moving drm_bridge_add() to probe() breaks probe deferral, causing a permanent -EINVAL failure.
- [Medium] Lockless data race on bridge state and next_bridge pointer when the panel attaches asynchronously.
--
commit 8b9a88707049c09bf2d0cddc2aeab67e8c2ea0b4
Author: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: move drm_bridge_add() call to probe
This commit moves the drm_bridge_add() call from the DSI host attach
callback to the probe function to allow the DRM card to populate even
without a connected DSI device.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/samsung-dsim.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2222,6 +2217,8 @@ int samsung_dsim_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto err_disable_runtime;
> }
>
> + drm_bridge_add(&dsi->bridge);
> +
> return 0;
Does moving drm_bridge_add() to the probe function break probe deferral?
By registering the DRM bridge here, the bridge becomes immediately available
to the DRM master (like imx-lcdif) before the downstream DSI panel has probed.
When the DRM master probes, it finds the bridge and calls drm_bridge_attach().
This routes to samsung_dsim_attach(), which unconditionally attempts to attach
dsi->bridge.next_bridge.
Because the panel hasn't attached yet, next_bridge is NULL. Passing a NULL
bridge to drm_bridge_attach() returns -EINVAL. This seems to cause the
display controller's probe to fail permanently instead of properly deferring
via -EPROBE_DEFER.
I noticed this is resolved later in the series by commit b9977e0ebaa4d
(drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: attach: return -EPROBE_DEFER is next bridge not yet
available), but it introduces a regression at this point in the tree.
Also, does this introduce a data race on the bridge state when the panel
attaches asynchronously?
Since the bridge is now exposed to the global bridge_list early, the DRM core
or master could access it while the downstream panel is still probing. The
dsi->bridge.next_bridge pointer and configurations like lanes, format, and
mode_flags are updated later in samsung_dsim_host_attach() without acquiring
any locks.
Is it possible for atomic callbacks or the DRM master's probe to read a
partially-updated next_bridge pointer or uninitialized configuration state
during this window?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260519-drm-bridge-hotplug-v1-0-45e2bdb3dfb4@bootlin.com?part=19
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-19 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-19 10:37 [PATCH 00/37] drm bridge hotplug Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 01/37] drm/connector: split drmm_connector_hdmi_init() in 3 parts Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 02/37] drm/connector: add drm_connector_hdmi_dynamic_init() Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 03/37] drm/display: bridge-connector: rename variable for consistency Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 04/37] drm/display: bridge-connector: store the drm_device pointer Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 05/37] drm/display: bridge-connector: split code creating the connector to a subfunction Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 06/37] drm/display: bridge-connector: use a drm_bridge_connector internally, not a drm_connector Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 07/37] drm/display: bridge-connector: extract drm_bridge_connector_get_bridges() Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 08/37] drm/display: bridge-connector: return int from drm_bridge_connector_get_bridges() Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 09/37] drm/display: bridge-connector: extract drm_bridge_connector_init_hdmi_audio_cec() Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 10/37] drm/display: bridge-connector: return int from drm_bridge_connector_init_hdmi_audio_cec() Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 11/37] drm/display: bridge-connector: return int from drm_bridge_connector_add_connector() Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 12/37] drm/display: bridge-connector: hoist error management to common code Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 13/37] drm/display: bridge-connector: move drm_bridge_connector_put_bridges() definition eariler Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 14/37] drm/display: bridge-connector: add non-drmm variant of drm_bridge_connector_put_bridges() Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 15/37] drm/display: bridge-connector: allocate the connector dynamically Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 16/37] drm/display: bridge-connector: move per-connector fields to the dynamic connector Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 17/37] drm/display: bridge-connector: protect dynconn creation and destruction with a mutex Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 18/37] drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: remove the panel_bridge on host_detach Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 19/37] drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: move drm_bridge_add() call to probe Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 20/37] drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: attach: return -EPROBE_DEFER is next bridge not yet available Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 21/37] drm/bridge: initialize chain_node list head on allocation Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 22/37] drm/bridge: initialize chain_node list head on detach and attach errors Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 23/37] drm/encoder: add drm_encoder_cleanup_from() Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 24/37] drm/atomic: move drm_atomic_helper_disable_all() and drm_atomic_helper_shutdown() from drm_atomic_helper to drm_atomic Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 25/37] drm/bridge: shutdown and cleanup on bridge unplug Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 26/37] drm: event-notifier: add mechanism to notify about hotplug events Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 27/37] drm/bridge: notify about detached bridges Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:32 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 28/37] drm/mipi-dsi: turn DRM_MIPI_DSI into a tristate Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 29/37] drm/mipi-dsi: notify about DSI attach Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 30/37] drm/bridge: add drm_bridge_is_tail() to know whether a bridge completes the pipeline Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 31/37] drm/bridge: panel: implement .is_tail Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 15:12 ` Neil Armstrong
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 32/37] drm/bridge: display-connector: " Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 33/37] drm/bridge: samsung-dsim: " Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 34/37] drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi83: " Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 35/37] drm/bridge: drm_bridge_attach(): don't fail on -EPROBE_DEFER Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 36/37] drm/display: bridge-connector: handle bridge hotplug Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:15 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-19 10:37 ` [PATCH 37/37] drm/mxsfb/lcdif: enable " Luca Ceresoli
2026-05-19 11:33 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260519111617.40BCCC2BCB3@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox