From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: fsl-lpspi: fix missing RX DMA termination on TX prepare failure
Date: Wed, 20 May 2026 10:30:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260520103051.BD6111F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260520094308.2882892-3-carlos.song@oss.nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The early error return paths in `fsl_lpspi_dma_transfer()` fail to call `fsl_lpspi_reset()`, leaving the SPI controller enabled with active DMA requests and stale FIFO contents.
- [High] A race condition between asynchronous target aborts and transfer preparation can lead to lost abort signals and indefinite task hangs.
--
commit 28e337398d010b76ae512c9b76eaed6b301c616f
Author: Carlos Song <carlos.song@nxp.com>
spi: fsl-lpspi: fix missing RX DMA termination on TX prepare failure
This commit addresses a potential memory corruption or use-after-free issue
when the TX DMA descriptor fails to prepare. It ensures the RX DMA channel
is also appropriately terminated before returning an error.
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c
> index 1a94a42fac319..906892453a843 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.c
> @@ -647,6 +647,7 @@ static int fsl_lpspi_dma_transfer(struct spi_controller *controller,
> tx->sgl, tx->nents, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV,
> DMA_PREP_INTERRUPT | DMA_CTRL_ACK);
> if (!desc_tx) {
> + dmaengine_terminate_sync(controller->dma_rx);
> dmaengine_terminate_sync(controller->dma_tx);
> return -EINVAL;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this error path leave the SPI
controller enabled and out of sync?
Prior to calling fsl_lpspi_dma_transfer(), the driver executes
fsl_lpspi_set_cmd() and fsl_lpspi_setup_transfer(). These enable the
SPI module and DMA requests, pushing a command word into the TX FIFO.
If dmaengine_prep_slave_sg() fails for the TX descriptor, we terminate the
DMA channels and return -EINVAL. The caller propagates this error to the
SPI core, but since the spi-fsl-lpspi driver does not implement the
handle_err() callback, the hardware is never reset by the core.
Since fsl_lpspi_reset() is bypassed here, the SPI module remains
enabled. Could subsequent transfers fail or corrupt data, making the
SPI controller unusable until the driver is unbound or the system reboots?
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the transfer preparation
sequence have a race condition with asynchronous target aborts?
fsl_lpspi_target_abort() can be called asynchronously by the SPI target
protocol driver to cancel an ongoing transfer, which sets
target_aborted to true and signals the completion structures.
Shortly after the DMA descriptor preparation shown above, the driver
calls reinit_completion() and unconditionally sets target_aborted to false:
fsl_lpspi_dma_transfer() {
...
reinit_completion(&fsl_lpspi->dma_tx_completion);
dma_async_issue_pending(controller->dma_tx);
fsl_lpspi->target_aborted = false;
...
}
If fsl_lpspi_target_abort() executes just before these variables are reset,
the completion wakeup count is overwritten to 0 and the abort flag is
cleared.
Since target mode transfers use wait_for_completion_interruptible() without
a timeout, would the SPI worker thread block indefinitely waiting for a
transfer that the master has already aborted?
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260520094308.2882892-1-carlos.song@oss.nxp.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-20 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 9:43 [PATCH v2 0/2] spi: fsl-lpspi: fix DMA termination issues Carlos Song (OSS)
2026-05-20 9:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] spi: fsl-lpspi: replace dmaengine_terminate_all with dmaengine_terminate_sync Carlos Song (OSS)
2026-05-20 10:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-20 16:52 ` Frank Li
2026-05-20 9:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] spi: fsl-lpspi: fix missing RX DMA termination on TX prepare failure Carlos Song (OSS)
2026-05-20 10:30 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-20 16:57 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260520103051.BD6111F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox