From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] mailbox: imx: Start splitting the IRQ handler in primary and threaded handler
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 13:58:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260603135823.1094E1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260603-imx_mbox_rproc-v2-5-a0059dc3b69a@linutronix.de>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Medium] Double `clk_disable_unprepare()` on `devm_mbox_controller_register()` error path.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unchecked return value of `pm_runtime_get_sync()` can lead to synchronous external aborts.
--
commit 2c0acf5c8fb62883e0037f32b817dbaada81aae9
Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
mailbox: imx: Start splitting the IRQ handler in primary and threaded handler
This commit splits the mailbox IRQ handling into a primary handler and a
threaded handler. The primary handler masks the interrupt event, allowing the
threaded handler to run in a preemptible context without raising the interrupt
again. As a first step, it prepares the logic and moves the TX handling part.
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> index d1de07cc0ed62..006aa76b74b62 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -629,7 +655,8 @@ static int imx_mu_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> if (!(priv->dcfg->type & IMX_MU_V2_IRQ))
> irq_flag |= IRQF_SHARED;
>
> - ret = request_irq(priv->irq[cp->type], imx_mu_isr, irq_flag, cp->irq_desc, chan);
> + ret = request_threaded_irq(priv->irq[cp->type], imx_mu_isr, imx_mu_isr_th,
> + irq_flag, cp->irq_desc, chan);
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but looking at imx_mu_startup()
in drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c, the return value of pm_runtime_get_sync()
is ignored:
pm_runtime_get_sync(priv->dev);
if (cp->type == IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB_V2)
return 0;
If the PM domain fails to resume (for example, returning -ENOMEM or
-ETIMEDOUT), will the function proceed to interact with hardware registers?
On i.MX platforms, accessing unclocked or unpowered hardware registers
typically results in a synchronous external abort and a kernel panic.
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(priv->dev, "Unable to acquire IRQ %d\n", priv->irq[cp->type]);
> return ret;
[Severity: Medium]
Looking at the driver changes introduced earlier in this patch series
(specifically "mailbox: imx: Use devm_pm_runtime_enable()"), there appears
to be a double clock disable issue on the error path:
drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c:imx_mu_probe() {
...
clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
ret = devm_mbox_controller_register(dev, &priv->mbox);
if (ret)
goto disable_clk;
...
disable_clk:
clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
return ret;
}
Could this cause the clock reference count to underflow and trigger a
warning in the clock framework if devm_mbox_controller_register() fails?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260603-imx_mbox_rproc-v2-0-a0059dc3b69a@linutronix.de?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 13:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-03 13:05 [PATCH v2 0/9] mailbox: imx: Use threaded handler to avoid kworker in imx's remoteproc Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] mailbox: imx: Add a channel shutdown field Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 13:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-03 14:59 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] mailbox: imx: Use devm_pm_runtime_enable() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 13:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-03 15:00 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] mailbox: imx: use devm_of_platform_populate() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 13:37 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-03 15:01 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] mailbox: imx: Use channel index instead of zero in imx_mu_specific_rx() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] mailbox: imx: Start splitting the IRQ handler in primary and threaded handler Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 13:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-03 15:07 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] mailbox: imx: Move the RX part of the mailbox into the " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 13:18 ` Daniel Baluta
2026-06-03 13:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 13:45 ` Daniel Baluta
2026-06-03 15:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] mailbox: imx: Move the RXDB " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 14:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-03 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] mailbox: imx: Don't force-thread the primary handler Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 14:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-03 15:20 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 13:05 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] remoteproc: imx_rproc: Invoke the callback directly Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-03 14:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-03 15:21 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260603135823.1094E1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox