From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: carlos.song@oss.nxp.com
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] i2c: imx-lpi2c: reset controller in probe stage
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2026 10:04:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260609100435.25D581F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609095119.924029-3-carlos.song@oss.nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] DMA channels requested via `dma_request_chan()` are never released, leading to a permanent resource leak upon driver unbind or probe failure.
- [High] Device removal cancels pending async suspend without disabling hardware clocks, leaving clocks permanently enabled.
--
commit a0b11faf7796dce688312611f6dc5e0060ca2cbb
Author: Carlos Song <carlos.song@nxp.com>
i2c: imx-lpi2c: reset controller in probe stage
Reset I2C controller in probe stage to avoid unexpected LPI2C controller
state left from previous stages and hang system boot.
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> index 540dc6cb664eb..ccc7384323e03 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1547,19 +1558,19 @@ static int lpi2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> ret = lpi2c_imx_init_recovery_info(lpi2c_imx, pdev);
> /* Give it another chance if pinctrl used is not ready yet */
> if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> - goto rpm_disable;
> + goto free_irq;
>
> /* Init DMA */
> ret = lpi2c_dma_init(&pdev->dev, phy_addr);
> if (ret) {
> if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> - goto rpm_disable;
> + goto free_irq;
> dev_info(&pdev->dev, "use pio mode\n");
> }
>
> ret = i2c_add_adapter(&lpi2c_imx->adapter);
> if (ret)
> - goto rpm_disable;
> + goto free_irq;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this error path permanently leak
the DMA channels?
If i2c_add_adapter() fails, we jump to the free_irq label, but nothing
releases the TX and RX channels allocated via dma_request_chan() in
lpi2c_dma_init().
It looks like lpi2c_imx_remove() also entirely omits dma_release_channel()
cleanup during driver unbind:
static void lpi2c_imx_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct lpi2c_imx_struct *lpi2c_imx = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
i2c_del_adapter(&lpi2c_imx->adapter);
pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
}
Will this eventually exhaust the system's DMA channels after repeated probe
failures or driver unbinds?
>
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does lpi2c_imx_remove() leave
hardware clocks permanently enabled if the device is active when unbound?
When lpi2c_imx_remove() calls pm_runtime_disable(), it synchronously cancels
any pending asynchronous idle/suspend requests (like the autosuspend timer
started here at the end of probe), but leaves the device in its current
power state.
If the device is in RPM_ACTIVE during unbind, the clocks remain enabled. Is
a manual check or a call to pm_runtime_put_sync() needed before disabling
PM runtime to avoid a silent resource leak?
>
> @@ -1567,6 +1578,8 @@ static int lpi2c_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> return 0;
>
> +free_irq:
> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, lpi2c_imx->irq, lpi2c_imx);
> rpm_disable:
> pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609095119.924029-1-carlos.song@oss.nxp.com?part=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-09 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 9:51 [PATCH v4 0/2] i2c: imx-lpi2c: fix probe error handling and reset controller carlos.song
2026-06-09 9:51 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] i2c: imx-lpi2c: properly unwind resources on probe failure carlos.song
2026-06-09 10:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 15:35 ` Frank Li
2026-06-09 9:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] i2c: imx-lpi2c: reset controller in probe stage carlos.song
2026-06-09 10:04 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260609100435.25D581F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=carlos.song@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox