From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: wei.fang@oss.nxp.com
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 7/9] net: dsa: netc: add VLAN filter table and egress treatment management
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2026 03:27:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260610032800.508131F00899@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260609032955.2066089-8-wei.fang@oss.nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] netc_port_update_vlan_egress_rule() incorrectly checks ett_eid instead of ect_eid before issuing an Egress Counter Table update, causing a hardware fault when ECT entries are exhausted.
--
commit daf8e6338d85480e82a01b715bb6d429fae4862d
Author: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
net: dsa: netc: add VLAN filter table and egress treatment management
Implement the DSA .port_vlan_add and .port_vlan_del operations to enable
VLAN-aware bridge offloading on the NETC switch.
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_main.c b/drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_main.c
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/netc/netc_main.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1025,6 +1054,385 @@ static void netc_switch_get_ip_revision(struct netc_switch *priv)
> +static int netc_port_update_vlan_egress_rule(struct netc_port *np,
> + struct netc_vlan_entry *entry)
> +{
> + bool untagged = !!(entry->untagged_port_bitmap & BIT(np->dp->index));
> + u32 num_ports = netc_num_available_ports(np->switch_priv);
> + u32 ett_eid = le32_to_cpu(entry->cfge.et_eid);
> + struct netc_switch *priv = np->switch_priv;
> + u32 ect_eid = NTMP_NULL_ENTRY_ID;
> + int err;
[ ... ]
> + if (entry->ect_gid != NTMP_NULL_ENTRY_ID)
> + /* Each ETT entry maps to an ECT entry if ect_gid is not NULL
> + * entry ID. The offset of the ECT entry corresponding to the
> + * port in the group is equal to ett_offset.
> + */
> + ect_eid = entry->ect_gid * num_ports + np->ett_offset;
> +
> + ett_eid += np->ett_offset;
> + err = netc_update_ett_entry(priv, untagged, ett_eid, ect_eid);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(priv->dev,
> + "Failed to update VLAN %u egress rule on port %d\n",
> + entry->vid, np->dp->index);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + if (ett_eid != NTMP_NULL_ENTRY_ID)
> + ntmp_ect_update_entry(&priv->ntmp, ect_eid);
[Severity: High]
Should this check ect_eid instead of ett_eid before updating the counter
entry?
When Egress Counter Table (ECT) entries are exhausted, entry->ect_gid will
be NTMP_NULL_ENTRY_ID and ect_eid will keep its default value of
NTMP_NULL_ENTRY_ID. Because ett_eid was previously incremented by
np->ett_offset, it is guaranteed to be non-null here even if ECT entries
were exhausted.
As a result, ntmp_ect_update_entry() could be executed with
ect_eid = NTMP_NULL_ENTRY_ID, which would submit an out-of-bounds index
update to the switch hardware and cause a command bus error.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260609032955.2066089-1-wei.fang@oss.nxp.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-10 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-09 3:29 [PATCH v4 net-next 0/9] net: dsa: netc: add bridge mode support wei.fang
2026-06-09 3:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 1/9] net: enetc: add interfaces to manage dynamic FDB entries wei.fang
2026-06-09 3:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 2/9] net: enetc: add "Update" and "Delete" operations to VLAN filter table wei.fang
2026-06-09 3:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 3/9] net: enetc: add interfaces to manage egress treatment table wei.fang
2026-06-09 3:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 4/9] net: enetc: add "Update" operation to the egress count table wei.fang
2026-06-09 3:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 5/9] net: dsa: netc: initialize the group bitmap of ETT and ECT wei.fang
2026-06-10 3:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 10:13 ` Wei Fang (OSS)
2026-06-09 3:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 6/9] net: enetc: add helpers to set/clear table bitmap wei.fang
2026-06-10 3:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-09 3:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 7/9] net: dsa: netc: add VLAN filter table and egress treatment management wei.fang
2026-06-10 3:27 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-10 10:16 ` Wei Fang (OSS)
2026-06-09 3:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 8/9] net: dsa: netc: add bridge mode support wei.fang
2026-06-10 3:28 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-10 10:30 ` Wei Fang (OSS)
2026-06-09 3:29 ` [PATCH v4 net-next 9/9] net: dsa: netc: implement dynamic FDB entry ageing wei.fang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260610032800.508131F00899@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wei.fang@oss.nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox