From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 2/6] serial: mxs-auart: rework clock handling in mxs_get_clks and probe
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2026 03:49:23 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260611034923.C20F01F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260611033856.6476-3-rosenp@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Medium] Unconditional clock enablement in probe introduces a reference leak and power management regression for non-ASM9260 devices on driver removal.
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Out-of-bounds array write or incorrect array cleanup due to a mismatch between `s->port.line` and `pdev->id`.
- [High] Potential kernel panic due to a Use-After-Unmap condition in the interrupt handler during device removal or probe failure.
--
commit 7ff1436c03e590a8440db3420eec3a2408bf70ee
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
serial: mxs-auart: rework clock handling in mxs_get_clks and probe
This commit updates the driver to use devm_clk_get_enabled for the AHB
clock so its enable/disable lifetime is managed by the driver model. It
also moves the mod clock prepare_enable out of mxs_get_clks and into
probe to avoid CLK_SET_RATE_GATE failures.
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/mxs-auart.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1697,10 +1686,8 @@ static void mxs_auart_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct mxs_auart_port *s = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>
> uart_remove_one_port(&auart_driver, &s->port);
> auart_port[pdev->id] = NULL;
[Severity: Critical]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this clear the wrong
array entry?
In mxs_auart_probe(), the entry is set using the alias ID:
auart_port[s->port.line] = s;
If pdev->id is -1 for device tree instantiated platform devices, wouldn't
this cause an out of bounds memory write into the BSS segment?
> mxs_auart_free_gpio_irq(s);
> iounmap(s->port.membase);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but can this cause a use-after-unmap during
device removal?
Since the interrupt was requested using devm_request_irq() in probe, the
devres core will keep it active until after mxs_auart_remove() fully returns.
If an interrupt fires during this window, wouldn't mxs_auart_irq_handle()
attempt to read from the hardware registers using the explicitly unmapped
membase?
> - if (is_asm9260_auart(s)) {
> + if (is_asm9260_auart(s))
> clk_disable_unprepare(s->clk);
> - clk_disable_unprepare(s->clk_ahb);
> - }
> }
[Severity: Medium]
Since s->clk is now unconditionally prepared and enabled for all device
variants during mxs_auart_probe(), shouldn't it be unconditionally disabled
here?
Guarding it behind is_asm9260_auart() seems like it will permanently leak
the clock enable reference for non-ASM9260 devices on module unload.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260611033856.6476-3-rosenp@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-11 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 3:38 [PATCHv3 0/6] serial: mxs-auart: devm conversion, clock rework, and IRQ ordering fixes Rosen Penev
2026-06-11 3:38 ` [PATCHv3 1/6] serial: mxs-auart: fix cast type for of_device_get_match_data Rosen Penev
2026-06-11 3:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 3:38 ` [PATCHv3 2/6] serial: mxs-auart: rework clock handling in mxs_get_clks and probe Rosen Penev
2026-06-11 3:49 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-11 3:38 ` [PATCHv3 3/6] serial: mxs-auart: use devm resources for iomem and GPIO IRQs Rosen Penev
2026-06-11 3:38 ` [PATCHv3 4/6] serial: mxs-auart: fix IRQ registration ordering and manage console clock Rosen Penev
2026-06-11 3:38 ` [PATCHv3 5/6] serial: mxs-auart: clamp RX DMA count to buffer size Rosen Penev
2026-06-11 3:49 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-11 3:38 ` [PATCHv3 6/6] serial: mxs-auart: terminate DMA before releasing channels in exit Rosen Penev
2026-06-11 4:00 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260611034923.C20F01F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox