From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: ziniu.wang_1@oss.nxp.com
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: remove unnecessary mmc_card_wake_sdio_irq check for tuning save/restore
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 11:13:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260625111325.6ED441F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260625105934.2890635-2-ziniu.wang_1@oss.nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] If `pm_runtime_force_resume()` fails in `sdhci_esdhc_resume()`, the function returns early without cleaning up software resources, leaking a runtime PM usage counter and leaving the device IRQ permanently disabled.
--
commit 49c3beebc2517e065c8ac10ff38587704b7567c1
Author: Luke Wang <ziniu.wang_1@nxp.com>
mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: remove unnecessary mmc_card_wake_sdio_irq check for tuning save/restore
This commit removes the mmc_card_wake_sdio_irq check during suspend
and resume for SDIO devices, as power is maintained even without the
SDIO IRQ wake flag. This ensures tuning delay values are properly
saved and restored.
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> index 18ecddd6df6f2..6526d65538de5 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2124,8 +2123,7 @@ static int sdhci_esdhc_resume(struct device *dev)
> * restore the saved tuning delay value for the device which keep
> * power during system PM.
> */
> - if (mmc_card_keep_power(host->mmc) && mmc_card_wake_sdio_irq(host->mmc) &&
> - esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data))
> + if (mmc_card_keep_power(host->mmc) && esdhc_is_usdhc(imx_data))
> sdhc_esdhc_tuning_restore(host);
>
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but I noticed a potential resource leak in
sdhci_esdhc_resume(). Does an early return on pm_runtime_force_resume()
failure skip cleaning up software state?
During system suspend, sdhci_esdhc_suspend() increments the runtime PM
usage count and disables the device IRQ:
sdhci_esdhc_suspend() {
...
ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev);
if (ret)
return ret;
...
disable_irq(host->irq);
}
During system resume, if pm_runtime_force_resume() fails, the function
returns early:
sdhci_esdhc_resume() {
...
ret = pm_runtime_force_resume(dev);
if (ret)
return ret;
...
enable_irq(host->irq);
...
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
}
If the early return is taken, does this leave the IRQ permanently disabled
and the PM usage counter unbalanced, potentially preventing the device and
its parent power domains from entering low-power states?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260625105934.2890635-1-ziniu.wang_1@oss.nxp.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-25 10:59 [PATCH v2 0/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix SDIO suspend/resume issues ziniu.wang_1
2026-06-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: remove unnecessary mmc_card_wake_sdio_irq check for tuning save/restore ziniu.wang_1
2026-06-25 11:13 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-25 16:26 ` Frank Li
2026-06-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: restore DLL override for DDR modes on resume ziniu.wang_1
2026-06-25 16:29 ` Frank Li
2026-06-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: restore pinctrl before restoring ios timing " ziniu.wang_1
2026-06-25 11:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 16:35 ` Frank Li
2026-06-26 6:03 ` Luke Wang (OSS)
2026-06-26 6:58 ` Bough Chen
2026-06-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: disable irq during suspend to fix unhandled interrupt ziniu.wang_1
2026-06-25 16:37 ` Frank Li
2026-06-26 6:04 ` Luke Wang (OSS)
2026-06-25 10:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mmc: sdhci-esdhc-imx: fix suspend/resume error handling ziniu.wang_1
2026-06-25 11:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-25 16:39 ` Frank Li
2026-06-26 6:07 ` Luke Wang (OSS)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260625111325.6ED441F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ziniu.wang_1@oss.nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox