From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Xu Yang" <xu.yang_2@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com,
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] phy: fsl-imx8mq-usb: add control register regmap
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2026 11:13:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260630111304.68B971F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260630-imx8mp-usb-phy-improvement-v5-4-25d616403844@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] Runtime PM enablement is leaked on probe error paths.
--
commit 487a0a8551844cc9b5c38e7f8d7cbf2ec3f1435d
Author: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@nxp.com>
phy: fsl-imx8mq-usb: add control register regmap
This commit adds a control register regmap for the USB 3.0 femtoPHY.
It exposes these registers through debugfs to assist with diagnostic
efforts.
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/freescale/phy-fsl-imx8mq-usb.c b/drivers/phy/freescale/phy-fsl-imx8mq-usb.c
> index 9d1dd0e7352ed..4949ec78d3044 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/freescale/phy-fsl-imx8mq-usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/freescale/phy-fsl-imx8mq-usb.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -695,6 +707,13 @@ static int imx8mq_usb_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(imx_phy->base))
> return PTR_ERR(imx_phy->base);
>
> + imx_phy->cr_regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(dev, imx_phy->base + PHY_CRCTL,
> + &imx_cr_regmap_config);
> + if (IS_ERR(imx_phy->cr_regmap)) {
> + dev_warn(dev, "Fail to init debug register regmap\n");
> + imx_phy->cr_regmap = NULL;
> + }
> +
> pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
> pm_runtime_enable(dev);
[Severity: Medium]
Is there a leak of the runtime PM enablement state on probe error paths here?
In imx8mq_usb_phy_probe(), pm_runtime_enable() is called, but subsequent
initialization steps (like devm_phy_create() or devm_regulator_get()) can fail
and return directly without calling pm_runtime_disable().
Could this leave the disable_depth counter at 0 on a probe failure like
-EPROBE_DEFER, resulting in an 'Unbalanced pm_runtime_enable!' warning on the
next probe attempt? Would using devm_pm_runtime_enable() ensure this state is
properly cleaned up?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260630-imx8mp-usb-phy-improvement-v5-0-25d616403844@nxp.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-30 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-30 10:11 [PATCH v5 0/5] phy: fsl-imx8mq-usb: few improvements Xu Yang
2026-06-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] phy: fsl-imx8mq-usb: fix typec switch leak on probe error path Xu Yang
2026-06-30 10:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] phy: fsl-imx8mq-usb: set usb phy to be wakeup capable Xu Yang
2026-06-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] phy: fsl-imx8mq-usb: add runtime PM support Xu Yang
2026-06-30 10:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-30 19:06 ` Frank Li
2026-06-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] phy: fsl-imx8mq-usb: add control register regmap Xu Yang
2026-06-30 11:13 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-30 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] phy: fsl-imx8mq-usb: keep PHY power domain runtime always-on for i.MX8MP Xu Yang
2026-06-30 19:13 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260630111304.68B971F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=xu.yang_2@oss.nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox