From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ze Huang" <ze.huang@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] drm/mcde: replace struct drm_simple_display_pipe with regular atomic helpers
Date: Sat, 04 Jul 2026 18:44:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260704184456.8C1571F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260705-drm-simple-kms-removal-v1-4-b4e1ca053623@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Critical] Uninitialized NULL pointer dereference when attaching encoder to connector.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Atomic callbacks directly access global `obj->state` pointers instead of using the state passed in the `drm_atomic_commit` parameter.
--
commit 098f44a54758ae5b340970e3384cc9330909fb06
Author: Ze Huang <ze.huang@oss.qualcomm.com>
drm/mcde: replace struct drm_simple_display_pipe with regular atomic helpers
Convert MCDE to explicit plane, CRTC and encoder objects.
Keep FIFO, event and framebuffer update sequencing intact, and install
GEM framebuffer prepare callback explicitly.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mcde/mcde_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mcde/mcde_display.c
> index 257a6e84dd583..4d86fa5030ebf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mcde/mcde_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mcde/mcde_display.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1149,16 +1171,14 @@ static void mcde_setup_dsi(struct mcde *mcde, const struct drm_display_mode *mod
> *dsi_formatter_frame = formatter_frame;
> }
>
> -static void mcde_display_enable(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe,
> - struct drm_crtc_state *cstate,
> - struct drm_plane_state *plane_state)
> +static void mcde_crtc_helper_atomic_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> + struct drm_atomic_commit *state)
> {
> - struct drm_crtc *crtc = &pipe->crtc;
> - struct drm_plane *plane = &pipe->plane;
> struct drm_device *drm = crtc->dev;
> struct mcde *mcde = to_mcde(drm);
> + struct drm_crtc_state *cstate = crtc->state;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, as it was inherited from the
simple-kms implementation, but does this newly added line introduce a data
race?
In non-blocking commits, the DRM core asynchronously executes the worker
thread while simultaneously swapping the global state pointers. Reading the
global crtc->state here instead of fetching the new state from the state
parameter (e.g. using drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state()) can race with
subsequent commits, potentially programming the hardware with mismatched
states.
[ ... ]
> -static void mcde_display_update(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe,
> - struct drm_plane_state *old_pstate)
> +static void mcde_plane_helper_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> + struct drm_atomic_commit *state)
> {
> - struct drm_crtc *crtc = &pipe->crtc;
> - struct drm_device *drm = crtc->dev;
> - struct mcde *mcde = to_mcde(drm);
> - struct drm_pending_vblank_event *event = crtc->state->event;
> - struct drm_plane *plane = &pipe->plane;
> + struct drm_crtc *crtc = plane->state->crtc;
> + struct drm_device *drm;
> + struct mcde *mcde;
> + struct drm_pending_vblank_event *event;
> struct drm_plane_state *pstate = plane->state;
> struct drm_framebuffer *fb = pstate->fb;
>
> + if (!crtc)
> + return;
> +
> + drm = crtc->dev;
> + mcde = to_mcde(drm);
> + event = crtc->state->event;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does accessing crtc->state->event here
continue to expose a time-of-check to time-of-use race?
If a compositor queues multiple rapid non-blocking commits, reading the event
from the global state might clear the event belonging to a subsequent commit,
leaving the later commit's worker with a NULL event and hanging the compositor
waiting for a page flip.
[ ... ]
> @@ -1510,11 +1577,30 @@ int mcde_display_init(struct drm_device *drm)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = drm_simple_display_pipe_init(drm, &mcde->pipe,
> - &mcde_display_funcs,
> - formats, ARRAY_SIZE(formats),
> - NULL,
> - mcde->connector);
> + ret = drm_universal_plane_init(drm, &mcde->plane, 0,
> + &mcde_plane_funcs,
> + formats, ARRAY_SIZE(formats),
> + NULL, DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY, NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + drm_plane_helper_add(&mcde->plane, &mcde_plane_helper_funcs);
> +
> + ret = drm_crtc_init_with_planes(drm, &mcde->crtc, &mcde->plane,
> + NULL, &mcde_crtc_funcs, NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + drm_crtc_helper_add(&mcde->crtc, &mcde_crtc_helper_funcs);
> +
> + ret = drm_encoder_init(drm, &mcde->encoder, &mcde_encoder_funcs,
> + DRM_MODE_ENCODER_NONE, NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + mcde->encoder.possible_crtcs = drm_crtc_mask(&mcde->crtc);
> +
> + ret = drm_connector_attach_encoder(mcde->connector, &mcde->encoder);
[Severity: Critical]
Will this lead to a NULL pointer dereference during probe?
mcde->connector appears to be a zero-initialized struct member that is not
allocated or populated prior to this call. Because
drm_connector_attach_encoder() unconditionally dereferences the connector
argument, passing it a NULL pointer will lead to an immediate kernel oops.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260705-drm-simple-kms-removal-v1-0-b4e1ca053623@oss.qualcomm.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-04 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-04 18:31 [PATCH 0/9] drm: replace simple display pipe users with atomic helpers Ze Huang
2026-07-04 18:31 ` [PATCH 1/9] drm/arcpgu: replace struct drm_simple_display_pipe with regular " Ze Huang
2026-07-04 18:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 7:43 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-07-06 8:01 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-07-04 18:31 ` [PATCH 2/9] drm/aspeed: " Ze Huang
2026-07-04 18:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 8:31 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2026-07-04 18:31 ` [PATCH 3/9] drm/imx: " Ze Huang
2026-07-04 18:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 18:31 ` [PATCH 4/9] drm/mcde: " Ze Huang
2026-07-04 18:44 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-04 18:31 ` [PATCH 5/9] drm/pl111: " Ze Huang
2026-07-04 18:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 18:31 ` [PATCH 6/9] drm/gm12u320: " Ze Huang
2026-07-04 18:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 18:31 ` [PATCH 7/9] drm/repaper: " Ze Huang
2026-07-04 18:31 ` [PATCH 8/9] drm/tve200: " Ze Huang
2026-07-04 18:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-04 18:31 ` [PATCH 9/9] drm/xen: " Ze Huang
2026-07-04 18:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-06 7:27 ` [PATCH 0/9] drm: replace simple display pipe users with " Thomas Zimmermann
2026-07-06 8:22 ` Ze Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260704184456.8C1571F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ze.huang@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox