Linux kernel and device drivers for NXP i.MX platforms
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: hongxing.zhu@oss.nxp.com
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] PCI: imx6: Fix i.MX6Q/DL boot hang by separating PHY power and reference clock control
Date: Mon, 06 Jul 2026 03:18:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260706031858.3BB1F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260706030629.3264320-1-hongxing.zhu@oss.nxp.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] PCIe PHY remains powered up on probe error paths
--

commit a734b2214ed3f695bc7968ca2438d6c116ff54b7
Author: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>

PCI: imx6: Fix i.MX6Q/DL boot hang by separating PHY power and reference clock control

Commit 610fa91d9863 ("PCI: imx6: Assert PERST# before enabling regulators")
introduced a boot hang on i.MX6Q/DL variants by changing the initialization
sequence.

The issue stems from coupling PHY power (TEST_PD) and reference clock
(REF_CLK_EN) control in imx6q_pcie_enable_ref_clk(). When these are
managed together, the timing between PHY power-up and reference clock
enablement cannot be properly controlled, leading to initialization
failures.

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> index 98e1db751132a..ab74f03f70bc8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c
> @@ -680,21 +680,12 @@ static int imx_pcie_attach_pd(struct device *dev)
>  
>  static int imx6q_pcie_enable_ref_clk(struct imx_pcie *imx_pcie, bool enable)
>  {
> -	if (enable) {
> -		/* power up core phy and enable ref clock */
> -		regmap_clear_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1, IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_TEST_PD);

[ ... ]

> -	} else {
> -		regmap_clear_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1, IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_REF_CLK_EN);
> -		regmap_set_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1, IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_TEST_PD);
> -	}
> +	if (enable)
> +		regmap_set_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> +				IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_REF_CLK_EN);
> +	else
> +		regmap_clear_bits(imx_pcie->iomuxc_gpr, IOMUXC_GPR1,
> +				  IMX6Q_GPR1_PCIE_REF_CLK_EN);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }

[Severity: Medium]
When TEST_PD is no longer asserted here, does this cause a power leak
during probe failure or driver removal?

Because imx_pcie_clk_disable() indirectly calls this function with
enable=false, it used to power down the PHY by asserting TEST_PD. After
this change, error paths only disable the clock but leave the PHY powered up:

drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c:imx_pcie_host_init() {
    ...
    imx_pcie_deassert_core_reset(imx_pcie);
    ...
    if (imx_pcie->drvdata->wait_pll_lock) {
        ret = imx_pcie->drvdata->wait_pll_lock(imx_pcie);
        if (ret < 0)
            goto err_phy_off;
    }
    ...
err_clk_disable:
    imx_pcie_clk_disable(imx_pcie);
    ...
}

The same applies to imx_pcie_host_exit() which calls imx_pcie_clk_disable()
during teardown.

Should imx_pcie_assert_core_reset() be explicitly called in
imx_pcie_host_init()'s error path (and in imx_pcie_host_exit()) to ensure
the PHY is properly powered down and reset?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260706030629.3264320-1-hongxing.zhu@oss.nxp.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-06  3:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-06  3:06 [PATCH v1] PCI: imx6: Fix i.MX6Q/DL boot hang by separating PHY power and reference clock control hongxing.zhu
2026-07-06  3:18 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-06 14:08 ` Soeren Moch
2026-07-07  3:03   ` Hongxing Zhu (OSS)
2026-07-07  6:22 ` Francesco Dolcini
2026-07-07  6:31   ` Hongxing Zhu (OSS)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260706031858.3BB1F1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox