Linux kernel and device drivers for NXP i.MX platforms
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Link Mauve" <linkmauve@linkmauve.fr>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
	lee@kernel.org,
	"Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, mfd@lists.linux.dev,
	neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] nvmem: make all reg_write callbacks take const void *
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2026 18:08:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260715180848.BD6951F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260715175229.24672-3-linkmauve@linkmauve.fr>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] Syntax error in `qfprom_reg_write` signature causing compilation failure
- [Low] Incomplete API migration causing widespread incompatible-pointer-types build errors across other subsystems
--

--- Patch [2]: [PATCH 2/8] nvmem: make all reg_write callbacks take const void * ---
commit 7e2f42ea4c9950738972bc60aeca19f14bd93ce4
Author: Link Mauve <linkmauve@linkmauve.fr>

nvmem: make all reg_write callbacks take const void *

This patch updates the reg_write callbacks in the nvmem subsystem to take a
const void pointer instead of a mutable void pointer for the value buffer.

>     nvmem: make all reg_write callbacks take const void *
>     
>     The previous commit switched from a pointer to mutable data to a pointer
>     to immutable data, so let’s fix all users of this API.

[Severity: Low]
Are there users of this API outside of the drivers/nvmem/ directory that were
missed during this migration?

For example, when building drivers like drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c or
drivers/misc/eeprom/at24.c, will assigning their unupdated callbacks to
nvmem_config.reg_write trigger incompatible-pointer-types build errors?

> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
> index a872c640b8c5a..bacdcb5610bae 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -253,13 +253,13 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv,
>   *
>   * Return: 0 or -err.
>   */
> -static int qfprom_reg_write(void *context, unsigned int reg, void *_val,
> +static int qfprom_reg_write(void *context, unsigned int reg, void void *_val,
>  			    size_t bytes)
>  {

[Severity: Low]
Does this cause a compilation failure?

The double void void declaration appears to be a syntax error that will break
the build when the Qualcomm QFPROM driver is enabled.

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260715175229.24672-1-linkmauve@linkmauve.fr?part=2

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-15 18:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-15 17:52 [PATCH 0/8] nvmem: make reg_write() take a const void * Link Mauve
2026-07-15 17:52 ` [PATCH 1/8] nvmem: core: " Link Mauve
2026-07-15 18:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 18:58   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-15 19:03     ` Link Mauve
2026-07-15 17:52 ` [PATCH 2/8] nvmem: make all reg_write callbacks take " Link Mauve
2026-07-15 18:08   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-15 17:52 ` [PATCH 3/8] rtc: " Link Mauve
2026-07-15 18:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 17:52 ` [PATCH 4/8] misc: " Link Mauve
2026-07-15 18:04   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 17:52 ` [PATCH 5/8] iio: pressure: bmp280: make reg_write callback " Link Mauve
2026-07-15 18:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 17:52 ` [PATCH 6/8] firmware: meson_sm: " Link Mauve
2026-07-15 18:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 17:52 ` [PATCH 7/8] mfd: twl-core: " Link Mauve
2026-07-15 18:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 17:52 ` [PATCH 8/8] media: ov2740: remove NULL reg_write callback Link Mauve
2026-07-15 18:07   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-15 19:02 ` [PATCH 0/8] nvmem: make reg_write() take a const void * Andy Shevchenko
2026-07-15 19:09   ` Link Mauve
2026-07-15 20:09   ` Yury Norov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260715180848.BD6951F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linkmauve@linkmauve.fr \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mfd@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox