From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ze Huang" <ze.huang@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/arcpgu: replace struct drm_simple_display_pipe with regular atomic helpers
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 09:15:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260716091533.1C6691F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260716-drm-simple-kms-removal-v2-1-1133a8fc3785@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Use-After-Free in debugfs when reading CRTC state without a lock
- [High] Unchecked `encoder_node` passed to `of_drm_find_and_get_bridge()`
- [Medium] Dynamic pixel format changes will not be programmed into the hardware
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/arcpgu: replace struct drm_simple_display_pipe with regular atomic helpers ---
commit 053328e64a955beacd393bc82052adf8a231ec8a
Author: Ze Huang <ze.huang@oss.qualcomm.com>
drm/arcpgu: replace struct drm_simple_display_pipe with regular atomic helpers
This replaces the deprecated simple-KMS display pipe interface with regular
atomic helpers. It instantiates the plane, CRTC, and encoder directly.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/arcpgu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/arcpgu.c
> index c93d61ac0bb75..e0cce4798f3ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/arcpgu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tiny/arcpgu.c
> [ ... ]
> @@ -218,35 +223,95 @@ static void arc_pgu_disable(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe)
> [ ... ]
> +static int arcpgu_plane_helper_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
> + struct drm_atomic_commit *commit)
> +{
> + struct drm_plane_state *plane_state = drm_atomic_get_new_plane_state(commit, plane);
> + struct drm_crtc *crtc = plane_state->crtc;
> + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state = NULL;
> +
> + if (crtc)
> + crtc_state = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(commit, crtc);
> +
> + return drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state(plane_state, crtc_state,
> + DRM_PLANE_NO_SCALING,
> + DRM_PLANE_NO_SCALING,
> + false, false);
> +}
[Severity: Medium]
Will dynamic pixel format changes be programmed into the hardware with this
check?
When a DRM client issues an atomic commit that only changes the framebuffer's
pixel format without changing the display mode, this function delegates to
drm_atomic_helper_check_plane_state() but doesn't check if fb->format
changed.
Because crtc_state->mode_changed isn't set to true on format changes, and
the hardware's pixel format register is only updated in arc_pgu_mode_set()
during atomic_enable(), does this mean the hardware might continue using the
old format and cause display corruption? The previous simple-kms helper
handled this by forcing a modeset when the format changed.
> [ ... ]
> @@ -285,6 +353,30 @@ static int arcpgu_load(struct arcpgu_drm_private *arcpgu)
> [ ... ]
> /*
> * There is only one output port inside each device. It is linked with
> * encoder endpoint.
> @@ -293,29 +385,24 @@ static int arcpgu_load(struct arcpgu_drm_private *arcpgu)
> if (endpoint_node) {
> encoder_node = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(endpoint_node);
> of_node_put(endpoint_node);
> - } else {
> - connector = &arcpgu->sim_conn;
> - dev_info(drm->dev, "no encoder found. Assumed virtual LCD on simulation platform\n");
> - ret = arcpgu_drm_sim_init(drm, connector);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return ret;
> - }
>
> - ret = drm_simple_display_pipe_init(drm, &arcpgu->pipe, &arc_pgu_pipe_funcs,
> - arc_pgu_supported_formats,
> - ARRAY_SIZE(arc_pgu_supported_formats),
> - NULL, connector);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - if (encoder_node) {
> /* Locate drm bridge from the hdmi encoder DT node */
> struct drm_bridge *bridge __free(drm_bridge_put) =
> of_drm_find_and_get_bridge(encoder_node);
[Severity: High]
Could this lead to attaching an unrelated bridge or indefinitely deferring
the probe?
In arcpgu_load(), if endpoint_node has no remote parent, encoder_node will
be NULL. In the previous code, the bridge lookup was guarded by an explicit
if (encoder_node) check. Now, of_drm_find_and_get_bridge(NULL) is called
unconditionally.
If a NULL node is passed, the bridge lookup iterates through registered
bridges and might return the first bridge with a NULL of_node, incorrectly
attaching it. If none are found, it fails with -EPROBE_DEFER, which might
leave the system without a working display. Should this retain the
encoder_node check?
> if (!bridge)
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> [ ... ]
> @@ -342,7 +429,7 @@ static int arcpgu_show_pxlclock(struct seq_file *m, void *arg)
> struct drm_device *drm = node->minor->dev;
> struct arcpgu_drm_private *arcpgu = dev_to_arcpgu(drm);
> unsigned long clkrate = clk_get_rate(arcpgu->clk);
> - unsigned long mode_clock = arcpgu->pipe.crtc.mode.crtc_clock * 1000;
> + unsigned long mode_clock = arcpgu->crtc.state->mode.crtc_clock * 1000;
[Severity: High]
Does this introduce a use-after-free risk when reading the CRTC state?
In arcpgu_show_pxlclock(), the new code accesses arcpgu->crtc.state without
holding the crtc->mutex lock.
If a user reads the pxlclock debugfs file concurrently with a display mode
setting operation completing, drm_atomic_helper_swap_state() might swap out
the old CRTC state and free it asynchronously. Dereferencing this dynamically
allocated state pointer without synchronization could lead to a kernel oops.
The previous simple-KMS code avoided this by reading pipe.crtc.mode, which
is embedded in the CRTC struct itself and updated safely for legacy access.
> seq_printf(m, "hw : %lu\n", clkrate);
> seq_printf(m, "mode: %lu\n", mode_clock);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260716-drm-simple-kms-removal-v2-0-1133a8fc3785@oss.qualcomm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-16 9:01 [PATCH v2 0/8] drm: replace simple display pipe users with atomic helpers Ze Huang
2026-07-16 9:01 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] drm/arcpgu: replace struct drm_simple_display_pipe with regular " Ze Huang
2026-07-16 9:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-16 9:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/aspeed: " Ze Huang
2026-07-16 9:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 9:01 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] drm/mcde: " Ze Huang
2026-07-16 9:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 9:01 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/pl111: " Ze Huang
2026-07-16 9:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 9:01 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] drm/gm12u320: " Ze Huang
2026-07-16 9:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 9:01 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] drm/repaper: " Ze Huang
2026-07-16 9:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 9:01 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] drm/tve200: " Ze Huang
2026-07-16 9:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-16 9:02 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] drm/xen: " Ze Huang
2026-07-16 9:28 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260716091533.1C6691F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ze.huang@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox