From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Karl Mehltretter" <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] serial: imx: clear imx_uart_ports[] entry on probe failure and removal
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2026 16:28:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260719162850.043B41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260719160812.35407-5-kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Lockless updates to the global imx_uart_ports[] array leave a Time-Of-Check to Time-Of-Use (TOCTOU) race condition during concurrent sibling probes and removals, allowing a stale pointer to be used for console registration and causing a deferred NULL pointer dereference.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing hrtimer cancellation for RS485 tx timers during device removal and shutdown leads to a Use-After-Free of the sport structure.
--
--- Patch [4]: [PATCH 4/4] serial: imx: clear imx_uart_ports[] entry on probe failure and removal ---
commit 85b874e619e770afd678fef4f09d60cd44a0c477
Author: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
serial: imx: clear imx_uart_ports[] entry on probe failure and removal
This commit clears the imx_uart_ports[] entry on probe failure and driver
removal. It prevents a stale pointer from being used by a sibling probe's
console setup during a devres free.
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> index 251a50c8aa387..617c35772056c 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> @@ -2637,6 +2637,8 @@ static int imx_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sport);
>
> ret = uart_add_one_port(&imx_uart_uart_driver, &sport->port);
> + if (ret)
> + imx_uart_ports[sport->port.line] = NULL;
>
> err_clk:
[ ... ]
> @@ -2647,8 +2649,10 @@ static int imx_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> static void imx_uart_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct imx_port *sport = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> + unsigned int line = sport->port.line;
>
> uart_remove_one_port(&imx_uart_uart_driver, &sport->port);
> + imx_uart_ports[line] = NULL;
[Severity: High]
Does clearing imx_uart_ports[] after uart_remove_one_port() create a race
condition with concurrent sibling probes?
When uart_remove_one_port() returns, all locks (including console_list_lock
and port->mutex) have been dropped.
If Thread A unbinds the UART, it unregisters the console inside
uart_remove_one_port(), drops the locks, but has not yet executed the newly
added line to clear imx_uart_ports[line].
Concurrently, Thread B probing a sibling UART can see the console is
unregistered, and successfully register it. During registration, Thread B's
imx_uart_console_setup() locklessly reads the still-valid
imx_uart_ports[0].
When Thread A resumes, it clears imx_uart_ports[0] = NULL, and devres frees
the port. A subsequent printk calls imx_uart_console_write_atomic(), which
reads the NULL pointer from the array and dereferences it.
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does device removal fail to cancel RS485
tx timers, leading to a use-after-free?
During device unbind, imx_uart_shutdown() loops waiting for
tx_state != OFF.
If the trigger_start_tx or trigger_stop_tx hrtimer is delayed or executing
concurrently, the loop times out, forcefully sets tx_state to OFF, and
returns without explicitly cancelling the timer using hrtimer_cancel().
Because imx_uart_remove() finishes without cancelling these driver-specific
hrtimers, devres will free the sport structure memory. If the delayed timer
subsequently fires, it will dereference the freed sport memory.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260719160812.35407-1-kmehltretter@gmail.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-19 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-19 16:08 [PATCH 0/4] serial: fix console lifetime bugs on failed bind and removal Karl Mehltretter
2026-07-19 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] serial: core: do fallible allocations before the console can be registered Karl Mehltretter
2026-07-19 16:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] serial: imx: clear imx_uart_ports[] entry on probe failure and removal Karl Mehltretter
2026-07-19 16:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-19 22:02 ` Karl Mehltretter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260719162850.043B41F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox