From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ze Huang" <ze.huang@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] drm/tve200: replace struct drm_simple_display_pipe with regular atomic helpers
Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2026 20:00:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260726200006.687F21F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727-drm-simple-kms-removal-v3-7-cd5dc89858c6@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Calling sleeping functions from CRTC atomic enable and disable callbacks violates atomic context constraints.
- [High] Setting `cstate->mode_changed = true` inside the plane's `atomic_check` callback bypasses downstream modeset routing, leaving bridges active during CRTC resets.
--
--- Patch [7]: [PATCH v3 7/8] drm/tve200: replace struct drm_simple_display_pipe with regular atomic helpers ---
commit c9e2ab55e3b69f124e64f349a1ced762885b2aea
Author: Ze Huang <ze.huang@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: drm/tve200: replace struct drm_simple_display_pipe with regular atomic helpers
Convert TVE200 to explicit plane, CRTC and encoder objects. Keep generic
plane-state validation before TVE200-specific mode, alignment, pitch and
format-change checks.
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_display.c
> index 26b6c65ef6fd0..beb3a5a63b5d5 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/tve200/tve200_display.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -69,13 +71,34 @@ irqreturn_t tve200_irq(int irq, void *data)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> -static int tve200_display_check(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe,
> - struct drm_plane_state *pstate,
> - struct drm_crtc_state *cstate)
> +static int tve200_plane_helper_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
> + struct drm_atomic_commit *commit)
> {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does setting cstate->mode_changed = true
inside the plane check hook bypass downstream modeset routing?
In tve200_plane_helper_atomic_check(), the code raises a mode change if the
framebuffer format changes:
if (old_fb && old_fb->format != fb->format)
cstate->mode_changed = true;
In the default DRM state check sequence, plane checks are executed after the
modeset checks. Because mode_changed is raised late and the driver does not
explicitly loop back to recalculate modeset routing, the downstream
encoders and bridges may miss their disable/enable hooks. Could this leave
bridges active during a CRTC reset?
[ ... ]
> @@ -119,16 +142,72 @@ static int tve200_display_check(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe,
> return 0;
> }
>
[ ... ]
> +static void tve200_crtc_helper_atomic_enable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> + struct drm_atomic_commit *commit)
> {
> - struct drm_crtc *crtc = &pipe->crtc;
> - struct drm_plane *plane = &pipe->plane;
> struct drm_device *drm = crtc->dev;
> struct tve200_drm_dev_private *priv = drm->dev_private;
> + struct drm_crtc_state *cstate = drm_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(commit, crtc);
> const struct drm_display_mode *mode = &cstate->mode;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code sleep in atomic context?
The DRM core invokes CRTC atomic enable callbacks during display commits,
which run in atomic context. However, tve200_crtc_helper_atomic_enable()
calls sleeping functions:
clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
...
usleep_range(30000, 50000);
I see this logic was carried over directly from the old
drm_simple_display_pipe hooks. Since sleeping in atomic context can cause
kernel warnings and potential deadlocks, is there a safe way to handle this
enable sequence?
[ ... ]
> @@ -240,9 +319,9 @@ static void tve200_display_enable(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe,
> drm_crtc_vblank_on(crtc);
> }
>
> -static void tve200_display_disable(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe)
> +static void tve200_crtc_helper_atomic_disable(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
> + struct drm_atomic_commit *commit)
> {
> - struct drm_crtc *crtc = &pipe->crtc;
> struct drm_device *drm = crtc->dev;
> struct tve200_drm_dev_private *priv = drm->dev_private;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but similar to the enable path above, does the
disable callback also sleep in atomic context?
tve200_crtc_helper_atomic_disable() eventually calls clk_disable_unprepare(),
which can sleep:
clk_disable_unprepare(priv->clk);
Since this runs in the atomic disable path, could this lead to a deadlock?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260727-drm-simple-kms-removal-v3-0-cd5dc89858c6@oss.qualcomm.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-26 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-26 19:45 [PATCH v3 0/8] drm: replace simple display pipe users with atomic helpers Ze Huang
2026-07-26 19:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] drm/arcpgu: replace struct drm_simple_display_pipe with regular " Ze Huang
2026-07-26 19:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] drm/aspeed: " Ze Huang
2026-07-26 19:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 2:29 ` Ze Huang
2026-07-26 19:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] drm/mcde: " Ze Huang
2026-07-26 19:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 2:31 ` Ze Huang
2026-07-26 19:45 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] drm/pl111: " Ze Huang
2026-07-26 19:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-26 19:45 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] drm/gm12u320: " Ze Huang
2026-07-26 20:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 3:29 ` Ze Huang
2026-07-26 19:45 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] drm/repaper: " Ze Huang
2026-07-26 20:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 2:35 ` Ze Huang
2026-07-26 19:45 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] drm/tve200: " Ze Huang
2026-07-26 20:00 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-27 2:55 ` Ze Huang
2026-07-26 19:45 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] drm/xen: " Ze Huang
2026-07-26 19:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 5:39 ` Ze Huang
2026-07-26 20:32 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] drm: replace simple display pipe users with " Linus Walleij
2026-07-27 1:37 ` Ze Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260726200006.687F21F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ze.huang@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox