From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Marek Vasut" <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
Cc: wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: dwc: Handle return value from endpoint .pre_init callback
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 01:37:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728013742.C292A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728012548.465139-3-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Unconditional cleanup in the rcar_gen4 endpoint driver leads to a double-disable of clocks and an unsafe unclocked register write when `pre_init` fails.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: dwc: Handle return value from endpoint .pre_init callback ---
commit 275f56803dca69c843553d94d9e95ba4e8dc68ae
Author: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>
PCI: dwc: Handle return value from endpoint .pre_init callback
This commit updates the DWC PCIe endpoint code to check and propagate the
return value of the .pre_init() callback. Drivers implementing this callback
are updated to return integer status codes rather than void.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> index d78fb845582b2..b00239097d893 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1524,8 +1524,11 @@ int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - if (ep->ops->pre_init)
> - ep->ops->pre_init(ep);
> + if (ep->ops->pre_init) {
> + ret = ep->ops->pre_init(ep);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> ret = pci_epc_mem_init(epc, ep->phys_base, ep->addr_size,
> ep->page_size);
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c
> index 8b03c42f8c84c..55ef0da9146c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static void rcar_gen4_remove_dw_pcie_rp(struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar)
> }
>
> /* Endpoint mode */
> -static void rcar_gen4_pcie_ep_pre_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> +static int rcar_gen4_pcie_ep_pre_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
> {
> struct dw_pcie *dw = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar = to_rcar_gen4_pcie(dw);
> @@ -381,9 +381,11 @@ static void rcar_gen4_pcie_ep_pre_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
>
> ret = rcar_gen4_pcie_common_init(rcar);
> if (ret)
> - return;
> + return ret;
[Severity: High]
If rcar_gen4_pcie_common_init() fails, it will disable the PCIe clocks before
returning the error. With this patch, the error is now propagated back up
through dw_pcie_ep_init().
The caller of dw_pcie_ep_init() will then unconditionally perform cleanup:
drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-rcar-gen4.c:rcar_gen4_add_dw_pcie_ep() {
...
ret = dw_pcie_ep_init(ep);
if (ret) {
rcar_gen4_pcie_ep_deinit(rcar);
return ret;
}
...
}
Because rcar_gen4_pcie_ep_deinit() accesses the unclocked PCIEDMAINTSTSEN
register and then calls rcar_gen4_pcie_common_deinit(), could this result in
writing to an unclocked register and triggering a synchronous external abort?
Could it also cause a clock framework reference count underflow when the clocks
are disabled a second time during the cleanup?
>
> writel(PCIEDMAINTSTSEN_INIT, rcar->base + PCIEDMAINTSTSEN);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static void rcar_gen4_pcie_ep_deinit(struct rcar_gen4_pcie *rcar)
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260728012548.465139-1-marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 1:24 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: dwc: Handle return value from endpoint .init/.preinit callbacks Marek Vasut
2026-07-28 1:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: dwc: Handle return value from endpoint .init callback Marek Vasut
2026-07-28 1:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 5:09 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2026-07-28 15:46 ` Roy Zang
2026-07-28 1:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: dwc: Handle return value from endpoint .pre_init callback Marek Vasut
2026-07-28 1:37 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-28 5:12 ` Siddharth Vadapalli
2026-07-28 15:44 ` Roy Zang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260728013742.C292A1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox