From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: haibo.chen@oss.nxp.com
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] spi: spi-nxp-fspi: propagate clock reconfig failures in nxp_fspi_select_mem()
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 10:28:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728102831.B55621F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728-fspi-clock-v2-3-dbe786a4a6eb@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [Critical] Incomplete state rollback on `nxp_fspi_select_mem()` failure leaves cached flags out of sync and the controller permanently stuck in Stop mode.
- [High] Error handling in `nxp_fspi_select_mem()` leaves hardware clocks disabled while PM runtime remains active, leading to deferred synchronous external aborts and unbalanced clock disables.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing `pm_runtime_put_noidle()` when `pm_runtime_get_sync()` fails, leaking the PM runtime usage counter.
- [High] The return value of `nxp_fspi_default_setup()` is completely ignored, masking initialization and clock setup failures.
- [High] The timeout error from polling the controller status is completely discarded in `nxp_fspi_exec_op()`.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v2 3/3] spi: spi-nxp-fspi: propagate clock reconfig failures in nxp_fspi_select_mem() ---
commit dbeb737d74251745ba44e92f371ba23d08069151
Author: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
spi: spi-nxp-fspi: propagate clock reconfig failures in nxp_fspi_select_mem()
This commit modifies nxp_fspi_select_mem() to return an error code if
clk_set_rate() or clock enabling fails. It also updates nxp_fspi_exec_op()
to check this return value and bail out to prevent accessing registers while
the clock is gated off.
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.c
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.c
> @@ -922,12 +922,19 @@ static void nxp_fspi_select_mem(struct nxp_fspi *f, struct spi_device *spi,
> nxp_fspi_clk_disable_unprep(f);
>
> ret = clk_set_rate(f->clk, rate);
> - if (ret)
> - return;
> + if (ret) {
> + /*
> + * clk_set_rate() failed with the clocks already disabled.
> + * Re-enable them so the enable count matches what the caller's
> + * pm_runtime_put() (runtime_suspend) will drop.
> + */
> + nxp_fspi_clk_prep_enable(f);
> + return ret;
[Severity: Critical]
If clk_set_rate() fails and we return early here, does this leave the
controller permanently in stop mode?
Earlier in nxp_fspi_select_mem(), the controller is placed into stop mode:
reg = fspi_readl(f, f->iobase + FSPI_MCR0);
fspi_writel(f, reg | FSPI_MCR0_MDIS, f->iobase + FSPI_MCR0);
Since the early return bypasses the exit from stop mode at the end of the
function, the controller remains stopped. Additionally, f->flags might have
been updated with FSPI_DTR_MODE. If a subsequent SPI operation matches the
fast-path check at the beginning of nxp_fspi_select_mem(), it would bypass
reconfiguration and attempt to execute commands on a stopped controller,
resulting in a hang.
[ ... ]
> @@ -1132,7 +1141,16 @@ static int nxp_fspi_exec_op(struct spi_mem *mem, const struct spi_mem_op *op)
> FSPI_STS0_ARB_IDLE, 1, POLL_TOUT, true);
> WARN_ON(err);
>
> - nxp_fspi_select_mem(f, mem->spi, op);
> + err = nxp_fspi_select_mem(f, mem->spi, op);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does assigning to err here discard the
timeout error from fspi_readl_poll_tout() immediately above?
If fspi_readl_poll_tout() times out, it returns -ETIMEDOUT to err, which is
flagged by WARN_ON(), but the function does not abort. Instead, err is
immediately overwritten by nxp_fspi_select_mem(), causing subsequent
operations to execute on a busy controller.
> + if (err) {
> + /*
> + * On failure the FlexSPI clock may be left disabled, so avoid
> + * any further register access (which would trigger a synchronous
> + * external abort) and bail out.
> + */
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(f->dev);
[Severity: High]
If nxp_fspi_select_mem() fails and leaves the clocks physically disabled, does
calling pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() leave the PM runtime state out of sync?
pm_runtime_put_autosuspend() maintains the RPM_ACTIVE state until the
autosuspend timer expires. If a subsequent SPI operation begins before the
timer fires, pm_runtime_get_sync() will succeed without re-enabling the
clocks. nxp_fspi_exec_op() will then attempt register access while the clock
is gated off, triggering a synchronous external abort.
If no operation occurs, the timer fires and runtime_suspend will disable
the already-gated clocks, potentially causing an enable count underflow.
> + return err;
> + }
>
> nxp_fspi_prepare_lut(f, op);
[ ... ]
For pre-existing issues not directly modified by this patch, there are a few
other observations in this file:
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does nxp_fspi_exec_op() leak the PM
runtime usage counter if pm_runtime_get_sync() fails?
drivers/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.c:nxp_fspi_exec_op() {
...
err = pm_runtime_get_sync(f->dev);
if (err < 0) {
dev_err(f->dev, "Failed to enable clock %d\n", __LINE__);
return err;
}
...
}
If pm_runtime_get_sync() returns a negative error code, the usage counter
remains incremented. Returning immediately without calling
pm_runtime_put_noidle() permanently prevents the device from runtime
suspending again.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but are initialization and clock setup failures
being masked during probe and resume?
drivers/spi/spi-nxp-fspi.c:nxp_fspi_probe() {
...
nxp_fspi_default_setup(f);
...
}
The return value of nxp_fspi_default_setup() is completely ignored in both
nxp_fspi_probe() and nxp_fspi_runtime_resume(). If clk_set_rate() or clock
enabling fails inside setup, the driver proceeds as if the hardware is
fully initialized, which could lead to silent failures.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260728-fspi-clock-v2-0-dbe786a4a6eb@nxp.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 10:18 [PATCH v2 0/3] Few fix/improvement for spi-nxp-fspi haibo.chen
2026-07-28 10:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] spi: spi-nxp-fspi: add per-SoC SDR/DTR clock rate limits for all supported SoCs haibo.chen
2026-07-28 10:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 15:14 ` Frank Li
2026-07-28 10:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] spi: spi-nxp-fspi: enter stop mode before reconfiguring MCR0 and DLL haibo.chen
2026-07-28 10:23 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 15:16 ` Frank Li
2026-07-28 10:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] spi: spi-nxp-fspi: propagate clock reconfig failures in nxp_fspi_select_mem() haibo.chen
2026-07-28 10:28 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-28 15:17 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260728102831.B55621F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=haibo.chen@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox