From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, Frank.Li@kernel.org,
"Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
"Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: errata: Add NXP iMX8QM workaround for A53 cache coherency issue
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 14:11:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260730141125.162E31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730-imx8qm-cache-coherency-v2-1-5651aeb1af16@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Missing Context Synchronization Event (CSE) after writing to `SCTLR_EL1`.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2] arm64: errata: Add NXP iMX8QM workaround for A53 cache coherency issue ---
commit 174c9667365c79e4a6011c183eeb84b1ff94a880
Author: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>
arm64: errata: Add NXP iMX8QM workaround for A53 cache coherency issue
This commit adds a workaround for the NXP i.MX8QuadMax SoC cache coherency
issue (ERR050104). It upgrades targeted TLBI and IC IVAU operations to
broadcast-all variants via static keys and alternatives, and disables KVM
support for the affected hardware.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230420112952.28340-1-iivanov@suse.de/
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> index 5db8f0619e4bc..1866eeec27cab 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -200,6 +201,16 @@ cpu_enable_cache_maint_trap(const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities *__unused)
> sysreg_clear_set(sctlr_el1, SCTLR_EL1_UCI, 0);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this write to SCTLR_EL1 require an
immediate isb() barrier before returning?
Writing to a control-plane system register like SCTLR_EL1 in
cpu_enable_cache_maint_trap() without an immediate Context Synchronization
Event (CSE) violates architectural invariants. Returning without an isb()
leaves the CPU pipeline in an undefined state, which could lead to spurious
exceptions or boot-time hangs on affected platforms.
> }
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260730-imx8qm-cache-coherency-v2-1-5651aeb1af16@nxp.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 13:53 [PATCH v2] arm64: errata: Add NXP iMX8QM workaround for A53 cache coherency issue Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-07-30 14:11 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-30 14:32 ` Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260730141125.162E31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox