From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: chipidea: ci_hdrc_imx: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 07:03:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807070353.CC8C41F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807065619.30604-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] The newly added error path for `platform_get_irq_optional()` bypasses `usb_phy_shutdown()`, potentially leaking the PHY initialization.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Pre-existing error handlers for IRQ allocation skip `usb_phy_shutdown()`, potentially leaking the initialized PHY.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: chipidea: ci_hdrc_imx: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup ---
commit 6c82c9cecd7d9e9567b9f2902520e1c741b42e44
Author: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
usb: chipidea: ci_hdrc_imx: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup
platform_get_irq_optional() returns a positive IRQ number on success or
a negative error code on failure. For an optional IRQ, -ENXIO indicates
that no IRQ is available, while other errors should be propagated.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260806065254.28204-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com/
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_imx.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_imx.c
> index 56d2ba824a0b2..7387c9903e800 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_imx.c
> @@ -525,6 +525,10 @@ static int ci_hdrc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> data->supports_runtime_pm = true;
>
> data->wakeup_irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 1);
> + if (data->wakeup_irq < 0 && data->wakeup_irq != -ENXIO) {
> + ret = data->wakeup_irq;
> + goto err_clk;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Does this jump skip the necessary cleanup for the USB PHY?
If usb_phy_init() succeeded earlier in ci_hdrc_imx_probe() and
platform_get_irq_optional() returns an error like -EPROBE_DEFER,
jumping directly to err_clk bypasses the phy_shutdown label:
ci_hdrc_imx_probe()
...
phy_shutdown:
if (data->override_phy_control)
usb_phy_shutdown(data->phy);
err_clk:
Can this leak the initialized PHY state, regulators, or clocks, especially
since -EPROBE_DEFER can be hit multiple times? Should this be goto
phy_shutdown instead?
> if (data->wakeup_irq > 0) {
> irq_name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s:wakeup", pdata.name);
> if (!irq_name) {
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but do the error handlers for IRQ allocation
also incorrectly skip the PHY shutdown?
If devm_kasprintf() fails or if devm_request_threaded_irq() fails below:
ci_hdrc_imx_probe()
...
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, data->wakeup_irq,
...
if (ret)
goto err_clk;
The error paths jump to err_clk, missing the phy_shutdown cleanup.
Could this lead to similar resource leaks if the USB PHY was successfully
initialized earlier?
> ret = dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "failed to create irq_name\n");
> goto err_clk;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807065619.30604-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-07 6:56 [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: chipidea: ci_hdrc_imx: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup phucduc.bui
2026-08-07 6:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] usb: chipidea: ci_hdrc_imx: Fix error handling when creating IRQ name phucduc.bui
2026-08-07 7:05 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07 9:20 ` Peter Chen
2026-08-07 19:18 ` Frank Li
2026-08-07 7:03 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-07 19:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: chipidea: ci_hdrc_imx: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup Frank Li
2026-08-08 9:13 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-08-07 9:16 ` Peter Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260807070353.CC8C41F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox