Linux kernel and device drivers for NXP i.MX platforms
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: chipidea: ci_hdrc_imx: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 07:03:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807070353.CC8C41F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807065619.30604-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [High] The newly added error path for `platform_get_irq_optional()` bypasses `usb_phy_shutdown()`, potentially leaking the PHY initialization.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Pre-existing error handlers for IRQ allocation skip `usb_phy_shutdown()`, potentially leaking the initialized PHY.
--

--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: chipidea: ci_hdrc_imx: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup ---
commit 6c82c9cecd7d9e9567b9f2902520e1c741b42e44
Author: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>

usb: chipidea: ci_hdrc_imx: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup

platform_get_irq_optional() returns a positive IRQ number on success or
a negative error code on failure. For an optional IRQ, -ENXIO indicates
that no IRQ is available, while other errors should be propagated.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260806065254.28204-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com/

> diff --git a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_imx.c b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_imx.c
> index 56d2ba824a0b2..7387c9903e800 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/chipidea/ci_hdrc_imx.c
> @@ -525,6 +525,10 @@ static int ci_hdrc_imx_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		data->supports_runtime_pm = true;
>  
>  	data->wakeup_irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 1);
> +	if (data->wakeup_irq < 0 && data->wakeup_irq != -ENXIO) {
> +		ret = data->wakeup_irq;
> +		goto err_clk;
> +	}

[Severity: High]
Does this jump skip the necessary cleanup for the USB PHY?

If usb_phy_init() succeeded earlier in ci_hdrc_imx_probe() and
platform_get_irq_optional() returns an error like -EPROBE_DEFER,
jumping directly to err_clk bypasses the phy_shutdown label:

ci_hdrc_imx_probe()
...
phy_shutdown:
	if (data->override_phy_control)
		usb_phy_shutdown(data->phy);
err_clk:

Can this leak the initialized PHY state, regulators, or clocks, especially
since -EPROBE_DEFER can be hit multiple times? Should this be goto
phy_shutdown instead?

>  	if (data->wakeup_irq > 0) {
>  		irq_name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s:wakeup", pdata.name);
>  		if (!irq_name) {

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but do the error handlers for IRQ allocation
also incorrectly skip the PHY shutdown?

If devm_kasprintf() fails or if devm_request_threaded_irq() fails below:

ci_hdrc_imx_probe()
...
		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, data->wakeup_irq,
...
		if (ret)
			goto err_clk;

The error paths jump to err_clk, missing the phy_shutdown cleanup.
Could this lead to similar resource leaks if the USB PHY was successfully
initialized earlier?

> 			ret = dev_err_probe(dev, -ENOMEM, "failed to create irq_name\n");
> 			goto err_clk;
> 		}

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807065619.30604-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com?part=1

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-07  7:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-07  6:56 [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: chipidea: ci_hdrc_imx: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup phucduc.bui
2026-08-07  6:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] usb: chipidea: ci_hdrc_imx: Fix error handling when creating IRQ name phucduc.bui
2026-08-07  7:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-07  9:20   ` Peter Chen
2026-08-07 19:18   ` Frank Li
2026-08-07  7:03 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-07 19:20   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: chipidea: ci_hdrc_imx: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup Frank Li
2026-08-08  9:13     ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-08-07  9:16 ` Peter Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260807070353.CC8C41F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox