From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] tty: serial: imx: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2026 09:18:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260807091846.2CCA01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260807090945.41690-2-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The global `imx_uart_ports` array retains a dangling pointer to a freed `sport` object if `uart_add_one_port()` fails during probe, or after device unbind.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH 2/3] tty: serial: imx: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup ---
commit 1b33dc8f639bc337c3928860fbfd0de822e373c4
Author: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
tty: serial: imx: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup
This commit updates imx_uart_probe() to properly propagate error codes
from platform_get_irq_optional(). It ensures that errors like probe
deferrals are returned rather than ignored.
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> index 251a50c8aa387..4224454d360ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/imx.c
> @@ -2463,7 +2463,11 @@ static int imx_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (rxirq < 0)
> return rxirq;
> txirq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 1);
> + if (txirq < 0 && txirq != -ENXIO)
> + return txirq;
> rtsirq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 2);
> + if (rtsirq < 0 && rtsirq != -ENXIO)
> + return rtsirq;
>
> sport->port.dev = &pdev->dev;
> sport->port.mapbase = res->start;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but looking further down in imx_uart_probe(),
does the error path for uart_add_one_port() leave a dangling pointer in the
global array?
If uart_add_one_port() fails, we see this sequence:
drivers/tty/serial/imx.c:imx_uart_probe() {
...
imx_uart_ports[sport->port.line] = sport;
...
ret = uart_add_one_port(&imx_uart_uart_driver, &sport->port);
err_clk:
clk_disable_unprepare(sport->clk_ipg);
return ret;
}
When this returns an error, devres will free the memory for sport, but
the global imx_uart_ports array still retains the pointer. Can a subsequent
console operation dereference this freed memory?
Additionally, the same issue appears to exist in imx_uart_remove() when
the device is unbound:
drivers/tty/serial/imx.c:imx_uart_remove() {
struct imx_port *sport = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
uart_remove_one_port(&imx_uart_uart_driver, &sport->port);
}
Should this removal function explicitly clear the pointer from
imx_uart_ports to avoid leaving a dangling pointer?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260807090945.41690-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-07 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-07 9:09 [PATCH 1/3] serial: qcom-geni: Propagate errors from optional IRQ lookup phucduc.bui
2026-08-07 9:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] tty: serial: imx: " phucduc.bui
2026-08-07 9:18 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-08 9:57 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-08-07 9:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] serial: 8250_mtk: " phucduc.bui
2026-08-07 9:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 10:42 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-08-07 9:17 ` [PATCH 1/3] serial: qcom-geni: " sashiko-bot
2026-08-08 9:41 ` Bui Duc Phuc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260807091846.2CCA01F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox