From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Guangshuo Li" <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: imx: imx8qxp-lpcg: fix runtime PM cleanup on error path
Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2026 08:13:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260808081320.368121F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260808080215.2669452-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Missing bounds check on `count` leads to a severe stack buffer overflow when reading device tree properties.
- [High] System suspend causes a NULL pointer dereference or Use-After-Free when the driver uses the legacy device tree binding or fails parsing.
- [High] Duplicate indices in the `clock-indices` device tree property lead to a double-free and potential invalid pointer dereference on the error path.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH] clk: imx: imx8qxp-lpcg: fix runtime PM cleanup on error path ---
commit 662987daf90805747f064d71045351ad4f076ebd
Author: Guangshuo Li <lgs201920130244@gmail.com>
clk: imx: imx8qxp-lpcg: fix runtime PM cleanup on error path
This commit fixes the error path of imx_lpcg_parse_clks_from_dt to properly
undo the runtime PM configurations. It ensures autosuspend is disabled and the
usage counter is correctly dropped on registration failure.
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8qxp-lpcg.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8qxp-lpcg.c
> index f0cf6cf918992..fa79d52cbb36e 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8qxp-lpcg.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8qxp-lpcg.c
> @@ -277,8 +277,9 @@ static int imx_lpcg_parse_clks_from_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
> if (clk_hws[idx])
> imx_clk_lpcg_scu_unregister(clk_hws[idx]);
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this teardown loop properly handle
duplicate indices in the clock-indices device tree property?
If the device tree contains duplicate values in clock-indices, the second
clock unconditionally overwrites the first in clk_hws[idx] during registration:
clk_hws[idx] = imx_clk_lpcg_scu_dev(&pdev->dev, output_names[i],
parent_names[i], 0, base,
bit_offset[i], false);
If an error occurs on a subsequent clock registration, the teardown loop
iterates backward and calls imx_clk_lpcg_scu_unregister() on clk_hws[idx].
Because clk_hws[idx] is never nulled out after unregistration, when the loop
encounters the duplicate index again, could it call kfree() on the
already-freed pointer, leading to a double-free?
Furthermore, if the failed registration itself returned an ERR_PTR that
overwrote a duplicate index, would the loop pass the ERR_PTR to
imx_clk_lpcg_scu_unregister() and crash the system?
> -
> + pm_runtime_dont_use_autosuspend(&pdev->dev);
> pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(&pdev->dev);
>
> return ret;
> }
While reviewing this code, I noticed a few other pre-existing issues in
the surrounding code.
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this function properly validate the
count retrieved from the device tree before using it to populate stack arrays?
imx_lpcg_parse_clks_from_dt() retrieves the number of elements into count:
count = of_property_count_u32_elems(np, "clock-indices");
It then uses count to populate statically sized stack arrays (bit_offset,
parent_names, and output_names) of size IMX_LPCG_MAX_CLKS:
ret = of_property_read_u32_array(np, "clock-indices", bit_offset,
count);
...
ret = of_clk_parent_fill(np, parent_names, count);
...
ret = of_property_read_string_array(np, "clock-output-names",
output_names, count);
If a device tree provides more than IMX_LPCG_MAX_CLKS elements, will this
overflow these stack allocations?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does system suspend cause a NULL pointer
dereference or Use-After-Free when the driver uses the legacy device tree
binding or fails parsing?
If the driver falls back to legacy device tree parsing, clocks are
registered using imx_clk_lpcg_scu() which passes dev = NULL. This leaves the
device drvdata unset:
drivers/clk/imx/clk-lpcg-scu.c:__imx_clk_lpcg_scu() {
...
if (dev)
dev_set_drvdata(dev, clk);
...
}
Alternatively, if imx_lpcg_parse_clks_from_dt() successfully registers one
clock but fails on a subsequent one, the error path unregisters and frees the
clock without clearing drvdata, leaving a dangling pointer.
When the system suspends, imx_clk_lpcg_scu_suspend() retrieves this NULL or
dangling pointer via dev_get_drvdata(dev) and dereferences it:
drivers/clk/imx/clk-lpcg-scu.c:imx_clk_lpcg_scu_suspend() {
...
if (!strncmp("hdmi_lpcg", clk_hw_get_name(&clk->hw), strlen("hdmi_lpcg")))
...
}
Can this lead to a panic during system suspend on systems using the legacy
binding or when encountering a malformed DT?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260808080215.2669452-1-lgs201920130244@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-08 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-08 8:02 [PATCH] clk: imx: imx8qxp-lpcg: fix runtime PM cleanup on error path Guangshuo Li
2026-08-08 8:13 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-10 8:29 ` Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-08-10 17:22 ` Brian Masney
2026-08-10 19:00 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260808081320.368121F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lgs201920130244@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox