From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Francesco Dolcini" <francesco@dolcini.it>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Frank.Li@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: lcdif: Add endpoint bus-width property
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 09:38:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260813093900.133C91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260813092836.38367-2-francesco@dolcini.it>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The newly added endpoint constraints (including `bus-width`, `video-interfaces.yaml` inclusion, and `unevaluatedProperties: false`) are applied using an exact string match for `endpoint`. This silently bypasses validation for indexed nodes like `endpoint@1` or `endpoint@2`, which are actively used by multi-endpoint configurations.
--
--- Patch [1]: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: lcdif: Add endpoint bus-width property ---
commit e694f44914c3b2ddcaf755532413ffea7e676ef7
Author: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com>
dt-bindings: lcdif: Add endpoint bus-width property
The DPI output of the LCD interface can be configured with a bus width
of 16, 18, or 24 bits. This introduces a bus-width property to the output
endpoint to specify the number of parallel RGB bits connected.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/fsl,lcdif.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/fsl,lcdif.yaml
> index 2dd0411ec6516..89cea0c14cf1d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/fsl,lcdif.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/fsl,lcdif.yaml
> @@ -68,9 +68,19 @@ properties:
> maxItems: 1
>
> port:
> - $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/properties/port
> + $ref: /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base
> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> description: The LCDIF output port
>
> + properties:
> + endpoint:
[Severity: Medium]
Will this strict property match cause a regression in validation for indexed
endpoints?
By using an exact string match for endpoint under the properties block, this
schema appears to silently bypass validation for multi-endpoint configurations
that use indexed nodes like endpoint@1 or endpoint@2.
Because these indexed nodes are matched and evaluated by the
^endpoint(@[0-9a-f]+)?$ pattern from /schemas/graph.yaml#/$defs/port-base,
they will satisfy the parent port node's unevaluatedProperties: false check.
However, any invalid properties or incorrect bus-width values inside those
indexed endpoint nodes will be ignored by this new schema block.
Should this use patternProperties with "^endpoint(@[0-9a-f]+)?$" instead of
an exact properties match to ensure all endpoints are properly validated?
> + $ref: /schemas/media/video-interfaces.yaml
> + unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> + properties:
> + bus-width:
> + enum: [ 16, 18, 24 ]
> +
> display:
> $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
> description: phandle to display panel
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260813092836.38367-1-francesco@dolcini.it?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-13 9:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-13 9:28 [PATCH v4 0/4] drm: mxsfb: Support LCDIF interface bus width Francesco Dolcini
2026-08-13 9:28 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: lcdif: Add endpoint bus-width property Francesco Dolcini
2026-08-13 9:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-13 11:33 ` Alexander Stein
2026-08-14 7:23 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-08-13 9:28 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] drm: mxsfb: Add optional DPI output bus-width configuration Francesco Dolcini
2026-08-13 9:28 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] ARM: dts: imx6ull-colibri: Set LCDIF bus-width Francesco Dolcini
2026-08-13 9:28 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] ARM: dts: imx7-colibri: " Francesco Dolcini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260813093900.133C91F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=francesco@dolcini.it \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox