From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: Zhipeng.wang_1@oss.nxp.com
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Let devres own the clock and runtime PM
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 10:26:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260821102635.4BD041F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821101039.4037925-7-Zhipeng.wang_1@oss.nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Missing pm_runtime_put_noidle() in remove() causes a usage counter leak, permanently breaking autosuspend upon driver rebind.
- [Medium] Ignoring the return value of pm_runtime_resume_and_get() in remove() can lead to a clock enable count underflow during devres cleanup.
--
--- Patch [6]: [PATCH v5 6/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Let devres own the clock and runtime PM ---
commit 57b65e0ae0ccb7952253c0bbf59f0e1f037ea934
Author: Zhipeng Wang <zhipeng.wang_1@nxp.com>
irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Let devres own the clock and runtime PM
In preparation for making the driver unbindable/reloadable, let the
driver core own the clock and runtime PM lifetime so that the probe()
error path and remove() do not have to hand-balance them.
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-irqsteer.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-irqsteer.c
> index b63bf957ab884..c2f58787f9a86 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-irqsteer.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-imx-irqsteer.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -289,6 +292,14 @@ static void imx_irqsteer_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct irqsteer_data *irqsteer_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> int i;
>
> + /*
> + * The device may be runtime-suspended here, in which case the
> + * runtime suspend callback has already dropped the clock enable
> + * count. Resume it so the devres clk_disable_unprepare(), which
> + * runs after remove(), finds the clock enabled and stays balanced.
> + */
> + pm_runtime_resume_and_get(&pdev->dev);
[Severity: Medium]
Is it safe to ignore the return value of pm_runtime_resume_and_get() here?
If it fails (for example, if clk_enable() fails in imx_irqsteer_resume()),
the device will remain suspended and the clock disabled. When devres
subsequently runs clk_disable_unprepare() during cleanup, wouldn't this
cause a clock enable count underflow?
[Severity: High]
Does this leak the runtime PM usage counter on driver unbind?
pm_runtime_resume_and_get() increments dev->power.usage_count on success,
but there doesn't appear to be a matching pm_runtime_put_noidle() or similar
put call before imx_irqsteer_remove() returns.
Since the devres action registered by devm_pm_runtime_set_active_enabled()
only calls pm_runtime_disable() (which does not drop the usage count),
wouldn't this permanently break autosuspend when the driver is rebound?
> +
> for (i = 0; i < irqsteer_data->irq_count; i++) {
> if (!irqsteer_data->irq[i])
> break;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260821101039.4037925-1-Zhipeng.wang_1@oss.nxp.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 10:10 [PATCH v5 0/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Allow building as module Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-08-21 10:10 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Call chained_irq_exit() on the handler error path Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-08-21 14:15 ` Frank Li
2026-08-21 10:10 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Use devm to manage the IRQ domain Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-08-21 10:10 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Validate IRQ count before creating domain Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-08-21 14:24 ` Frank Li
2026-08-24 9:38 ` Zhipeng Wang (OSS)
2026-08-24 12:49 ` Fabio Estevam
2026-08-26 3:26 ` Zhipeng Wang (OSS)
2026-08-21 10:10 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Dispose of parent IRQ mappings in remove() Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-08-21 10:10 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Mask all interrupts in probe() Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-08-21 10:10 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Let devres own the clock and runtime PM Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-08-21 10:26 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-26 5:53 ` Zhipeng Wang (OSS)
2026-08-21 10:10 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Allow building as module Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-08-21 10:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-21 10:10 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] genirq/irqdomain: Add devm_irq_domain_create_linear() Zhipeng.wang_1
2026-08-21 10:10 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] irqchip/imx-irqsteer: Use devm_irq_domain_create_linear() Zhipeng.wang_1
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260821102635.4BD041F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=Zhipeng.wang_1@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox