From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Linmao Li" <lilinmao@kylinos.cn>
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: mxs-dcp: handle zero-length skcipher requests
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 09:45:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260828094530.DEF4B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260828093209.3179074-1-lilinmao@kylinos.cn>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The patch prevents an IV pointer underflow for 0-length skcipher requests, but the exact same underflow still occurs for certain non-zero length requests if the payload triggers a 0-byte hardware flush.
- [High] DMA mapping for `desc_phys` is leaked in `mxs_dcp_start_dma()` on hardware timeout or error paths.
--
commit d4942ea53ae872751299af5195d892f7af73d2e1
Author: Linmao Li <lilinmao@kylinos.cn>
crypto: mxs-dcp: handle zero-length skcipher requests
This patch returns success early for zero-length skcipher requests in
mxs_dcp_aes_enqueue() to prevent an invalid source access and IV pointer
underflow.
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/mxs-dcp.c b/drivers/crypto/mxs-dcp.c
> index 133ebc9982362..60794b4d49fac 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/mxs-dcp.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/mxs-dcp.c
> @@ -473,6 +473,9 @@ static int mxs_dcp_aes_enqueue(struct skcipher_request *req, int enc, int ecb)
> struct dcp_aes_req_ctx *rctx = skcipher_request_ctx(req);
> int ret;
>
> + if (!req->cryptlen)
> + return 0;
> +
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but while this patch prevents an IV pointer
underflow for 0-length requests, does the exact same underflow still occur
for certain non-zero length requests if the payload triggers a 0-byte
hardware flush?
If req->cryptlen is a non-zero multiple of 4096 bytes and the scatterlist
contains trailing extra data, limit_hit evaluates to true. Because the data
perfectly filled the bounce buffer on the previous iteration, actx->fill was
reset to 0.
In mxs_dcp_aes_block_crypt(), the do-while loop would execute once with len
clamped to 0:
if (limit_hit)
len = req->cryptlen - (tlen - len);
do {
...
if (actx->fill == out_off || sg_is_last(src) ||
limit_hit) {
ret = mxs_dcp_run_aes(actx, req, init);
This unconditionally submits the buffer with actx->fill == 0. Then
last_out_len is overwritten to 0:
last_out_len = actx->fill;
Causing an out-of-bounds read when calculating the IV offset:
memcpy(req->iv, out_buf+(last_out_len-AES_BLOCK_SIZE),
AES_BLOCK_SIZE);
Could this allow a kernel oops or a leak of up to 16 bytes of adjacent slab
memory to userspace via the updated IV?
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but if the hardware rejects the 0-byte flush
caused by the edge case above, does mxs_dcp_start_dma() leak the DMA
mapping for desc_phys?
In mxs_dcp_start_dma(), if the channel times out or reports an error, it
returns without calling dma_unmap_single() for the descriptor:
if (!ret) {
dev_err(sdcp->dev, "Channel %i timeout (DCP_STAT=0x%08x)\n",
chan, readl(sdcp->base + MXS_DCP_STAT));
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
if (stat & 0xff) {
dev_err(sdcp->dev, "Channel %i error (CH_STAT=0x%08x)\n",
chan, stat);
return -EINVAL;
}
Could this resource leak be triggered repeatedly by untrusted input to
exhaust IOMMU or swiotlb space, leading to a denial of service?
> if (unlikely(actx->key_len != AES_KEYSIZE_128 && !actx->key_referenced))
> return mxs_dcp_block_fallback(req, enc);
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260828093209.3179074-1-lilinmao@kylinos.cn?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 9:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 9:32 [PATCH] crypto: mxs-dcp: handle zero-length skcipher requests Linmao Li
2026-08-28 9:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-28 19:25 ` Frank Li
2026-08-31 12:42 ` Linmao Li
2026-08-31 15:01 ` Frank Li
2026-09-01 3:05 ` Linmao Li
2026-09-01 19:07 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260828094530.DEF4B1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lilinmao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox