From: Mehmet Fide <mehmet.fide@gmail.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@kernel.org>, Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>, Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
Jacky Bai <ping.bai@nxp.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mehmet Fide <mehmet.fide@screeningeagle.com>,
sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] pinctrl: imx: answer OUTPUT_ENABLE/INPUT_ENABLE queries from the pad register
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 13:08:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902110801.3893392-1-mehmet.fide@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902075629.D0B1C1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org>
From: Mehmet Fide <mehmet.fide@screeningeagle.com>
> New issues:
> - [High] Dangerous asymmetry between `pin_config_get` (generic) and `pin_config_set` (raw) causes hardware register corruption.
> - [Medium] Incomplete transition to generic pinconf API breaks SCU-based platforms.
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [Critical] Out-of-bounds write during Device Tree parsing in imx_pinctrl_parse_pin_mmio
[...]
> [Severity: Medium]
> Does this bypass the generic decoding logic for SCU platforms?
>
> If a generic caller like pinctrl_gpio_get_config() queries an SCU-based
> platform, it appears the SCU path (info->imx_pinconf_get) will overwrite
> the generic parameter in *config with a raw hardware register value instead
> of unpacking it.
Yes, that slipped through: the SCU callback returns the raw pad value
like the mmio one did. v3 makes imx_pinconf_get() return -ENOTSUPP for
IMX_USE_SCU SoCs, so a generic query gets "not supported" there instead
of register bits; the debugfs dump keeps reading the raw value through
the SCU path as before.
[...]
> [Severity: High]
> Does this introduce an asymmetry between the get and set callbacks causing
> hardware corruption?
>
> While the get callback now unpacks generic parameters, imx_pinconf_set_mmio()
> remains completely raw. If a generic caller like pinctrl_gpio_set_config()
> passes a packed config (e.g., PIN_CONFIG_LEVEL), will it be blindly written
> into the hardware pad configuration register here?
It would, and it would have before this patch too; the set side is not
changed here. The fsl,pins binding hands pin_config_set the raw pad
register value and that is the only thing it accepts. The one in-tree
route for a packed config into it is gpiochip_generic_config(), and the
GPIO drivers on these pin controllers do not install it as set_config
(gpio-mmio, gpio-vf610, gpio-mxc); gpio-mxc calls it directly only on
the SCU based SoCs, with the SCU wakeup code the SCU set callback
expects, not a generic parameter. Without a set_config the gpiolib bias
and persist helpers stop at -ENOTSUPP before reaching pinctrl. A raw
value and a packed one cannot be told apart in the callback either, so
decoding on the set side means a real conversion of the driver, not a
fix that belongs in this series. v3 states that boundary in the commit
message.
[...]
> [Severity: Critical]
> This is a pre-existing issue, but can the Device Tree parsing cause an
> out-of-bounds write here?
>
> Looking at imx_pinctrl_parse_pin_mmio() in drivers/pinctrl/freescale/pinctrl-imx.c:
>
> *pin_id = (mux_reg != -1) ? mux_reg / 4 : conf_reg / 4;
> pin_reg = &ipctl->pin_regs[*pin_id];
> pin->pin = *pin_id;
> pin_reg->mux_reg = mux_reg;
> pin_reg->conf_reg = conf_reg;
>
> If a maliciously crafted Device Tree overlay provides an excessively large
> mux_reg or conf_reg value, the unvalidated pin_id is used to index into
> ipctl->pin_regs, potentially overwriting arbitrary memory.
Agreed that the index is not checked against info->npins; it has been
like that since the parser was written and this patch does not touch it.
A bounds check with -EINVAL is a one-liner, I will send it as a separate
patch after this series.
Mehmet
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-02 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-02 7:39 [PATCH v2 0/2] gpio: mmio: report the line direction on chips without direction registers Mehmet Fide
2026-09-02 7:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] pinctrl: imx: answer OUTPUT_ENABLE/INPUT_ENABLE queries from the pad register Mehmet Fide
2026-09-02 7:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-02 11:08 ` Mehmet Fide [this message]
2026-09-02 7:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] gpio: mmio: track the direction of chips without direction registers Mehmet Fide
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260902110801.3893392-1-mehmet.fide@gmail.com \
--to=mehmet.fide@gmail.com \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=aisheng.dong@nxp.com \
--cc=brgl@kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mehmet.fide@screeningeagle.com \
--cc=ping.bai@nxp.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox