From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: fec: Propagate PTP initialization errors
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2026 09:25:18 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260904092519.2644A1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260903092430.354186-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The device interrupt handlers are exposed to a use-after-free window on probe error paths because devm_request_irq() is used alongside manual free_netdev().
- [High] Use-after-free on perout_timer due to incorrect teardown ordering in fec_ptp_stop().
--
commit c7933bca59e467b625e0e61dff17b0ea0651dbf8
Author: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Date: Thu Sep 3 09:24:30 2026 +0000
net: fec: Propagate PTP initialization errors
This commit modifies fec_ptp_init() to return an error code instead of
silently ignoring failures. It adds error propagation for devm_request_irq()
and ptp_clock_register() up through the probe function.
Link v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260820111416.97917-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com/
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> index 794ec427b0ee6..c6e29b5c2abb4 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
> @@ -5384,8 +5384,11 @@ fec_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto failed_reset;
>
> irq_cnt = fec_enet_get_irq_cnt(pdev);
> - if (fep->bufdesc_ex)
> - fec_ptp_init(pdev, irq_cnt);
> + if (fep->bufdesc_ex) {
> + ret = fec_ptp_init(pdev, irq_cnt);
> + if (ret)
> + goto failed_reset;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but returning an error here
exposes a pre-existing use-after-free window in the error path.
Because both the PPS interrupt and MAC interrupts are registered using
devm_request_irq(), their lifetime is tied to the platform device. When we
jump to failed_reset, the cleanup code eventually calls free_netdev(ndev).
Since devm_request_irq() teardown happens via devres_release_all() only
after fec_probe() returns, the interrupts remain active while the netdevice
and driver private data are already freed.
If an interrupt fires during this window, wouldn't the handlers
(fec_pps_interrupt or fec_enet_interrupt) dereference the freed ndev and
fep pointers? Should the driver avoid mixing devm_request_irq() with manual
free_netdev() to prevent this?
> + }
>
> ret = fec_enet_init(ndev);
> if (ret)
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c
> index 56801c2009d59..557a76797ebaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_ptp.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -779,26 +779,32 @@ void fec_ptp_init(struct platform_device *pdev, int irq_idx)
> HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
>
> irq = platform_get_irq_byname_optional(pdev, "pps");
> - if (irq < 0)
> + if (irq < 0 && irq != -ENXIO)
> + return irq;
> + if (irq == -ENXIO) {
> irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, irq_idx);
> - /* Failure to get an irq is not fatal,
> - * only the PTP_CLOCK_PPS clock events should stop
> - */
> - if (irq >= 0) {
> + if (irq < 0 && irq != -ENXIO)
> + return irq;
> + }
> +
> + if (irq > 0) {
> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, fec_pps_interrupt,
> 0, pdev->name, ndev);
> if (ret < 0)
> - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "request for pps irq failed(%d)\n",
> - ret);
> + return ret;
> }
>
> fep->ptp_clock = ptp_clock_register(&fep->ptp_caps, &pdev->dev);
> if (IS_ERR(fep->ptp_clock)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(fep->ptp_clock);
> fep->ptp_clock = NULL;
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "ptp_clock_register failed\n");
> + return ret;
> }
>
> schedule_delayed_work(&fep->time_keep, HZ);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but since this patch handles the setup of
the PTP clock, it's worth noting the teardown path has a potential
use-after-free.
In fec_ptp_stop(), the driver cancels fep->perout_timer before calling
ptp_clock_unregister(fep->ptp_clock):
fec_ptp_stop() {
...
hrtimer_cancel(&fep->perout_timer);
if (fep->ptp_clock)
ptp_clock_unregister(fep->ptp_clock);
...
}
Because the PTP clock device is still registered with the subsystem while
the timer is cancelled, could a concurrent userspace thread issue a
PTP_CLK_REQ_PEROUT ioctl and re-arm the timer just before the netdevice is
freed by the driver remove function?
If so, when the re-armed timer expires, its callback
(fec_ptp_pps_perout_handler) would execute on freed memory.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260903092430.354186-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-04 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-03 9:24 [PATCH net-next v2] net: fec: Propagate PTP initialization errors phucduc.bui
2026-09-03 9:29 ` Wei Fang
2026-09-03 10:45 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-09-04 1:52 ` Wei Fang
2026-09-04 3:03 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-09-04 3:23 ` Wei Fang
2026-09-04 9:16 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-09-04 12:45 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-09-07 2:19 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-09-03 14:37 ` Andrew Lunn
2026-09-04 9:25 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-04 10:43 ` Bui Duc Phuc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260904092519.2644A1F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox