From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: pankaj.gupta@oss.nxp.com
Cc: conor+dt@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Frank.Li@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v51 1/7] Documentation/firmware: add imx/se to other_interfaces
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 14:27:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260914142754.70A2B1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260915-imx-se-if-v51-1-4a7dac612cb5@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Artificially intercepting a successfully completed firmware command to return `-EINTR` leads to firmware resource leaks and violates standard syscall semantics.
--
commit 08f44ced154dcd881139680cedb3ca1074757a26
Author: Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@nxp.com>
Documentation/firmware: add imx/se to other_interfaces
Documents i.MX SoC's Service layer and C_DEV driver for selected SoC(s)
that contains the NXP hardware IP(s) for Secure Enclaves(se) like:
- NXP EdgeLock Enclave on i.MX93 & i.MX8ULP
> diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/other_interfaces.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/other_interfaces.rst
> index 06ac89adaafba..984ee3ecc8dc2 100644
> --- a/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/other_interfaces.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/firmware/other_interfaces.rst
[ ... ]
> + | [fw_api_specific_ops() |
> + | (is_cmd_interrupted=true): |
> + | for SESSION_OPEN: record |
> + | handle, close session via |
> + | se_close_session(), clear; |
> + | for STORAGE_OPEN: record |
> + | handle, close storage via |
> + | se_close_storage(), return 0] |
> + | err = -EINTR |
> + | (not -ERESTARTSYS: |
> + | prevents VFS auto-restart) |
> + |<--ioctl -EINTR-----| |
> + | | |
> + | [signal handler runs; userspace decides |
> + | whether to re-issue; FW handle tracked |
> + | or cleaned up; no firmware resource leak]|
[Severity: High]
Does this behavior leak firmware resources for commands other than SESSION_OPEN
and STORAGE_OPEN?
If a non-fatal signal is delivered during the ioctl wait for operations like
ELE_MAC_OPEN_REQ, ele_msg_send_rcv() overrides the successful result with
-ERESTARTSYS.
Then se_ioctl_cmd_snd_rcv_rsp_handler() catches this, calls
fw_api_specific_ops(is_cmd_interrupted=true), and returns -EINTR.
However, fw_api_specific_ops() only implements rollback for session and
storage handles:
ele_fw_api.c:fw_api_specific_ops() {
...
switch (header->command) {
case ELE_SESSION_OPEN_REQ:
...
case ELE_STORAGE_OPEN_REQ:
...
}
}
This silently ignores and leaks all other handle-creating operations.
Because -EINTR is returned, the response containing the handle is not copied
to userspace. This permanently leaks the resource in the secure enclave, and
could allow unprivileged users to cause a denial of service by sending
signals to their own process during ioctls.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260915-imx-se-if-v51-0-4a7dac612cb5@nxp.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-14 19:39 [PATCH v51 0/7] firmware: imx: driver for NXP secure-enclave pankaj.gupta
2026-09-14 19:39 ` [PATCH v51 1/7] Documentation/firmware: add imx/se to other_interfaces pankaj.gupta
2026-09-14 14:27 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-09-14 19:39 ` [PATCH v51 2/7] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add imx-se-fw binding doc pankaj.gupta
2026-09-14 19:40 ` [PATCH v51 3/7] firmware: imx: add driver for NXP EdgeLock Enclave pankaj.gupta
2026-09-14 19:40 ` [PATCH v51 4/7] firmware: imx: device context dedicated to priv pankaj.gupta
2026-09-14 19:40 ` [PATCH v51 5/7] firmware: imx: adds miscdev pankaj.gupta
2026-09-14 15:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 17:34 ` Pankaj Gupta (OSS)
2026-09-16 13:16 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-09-16 14:39 ` Frank Li
2026-10-05 14:28 ` Frieder Schrempf
2026-09-24 16:14 ` [EXT] " Pankaj Gupta
2026-09-14 19:40 ` [PATCH v51 6/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: add secure enclave node pankaj.gupta
2026-09-14 15:17 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-14 19:40 ` [PATCH v51 7/7] arm64: dts: imx8ulp: add reserved memory for EdgeLock Enclave pankaj.gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260914142754.70A2B1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pankaj.gupta@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox