From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 536F03DCDA3; Sun, 20 Sep 2026 06:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789887296; cv=none; b=mpLYQZKZq4N8+I8YgoNJ55JwmgwWtwnupIF8AbYlv2C9vlAEjBA/g5EQfPF9orPGBhKfQxXRMa7eYcdHL4lnwI2Pi1EFk4cXshlypHrYWLXuOjORXnoOVhChCyIfTENjdAMf84HsKoZYsLiE9LpkM/4+o/jWKlrcdIUWLgUZN9w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1789887296; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5+2YEPlp4H+FPCcvFGKV7EJU6cgtDOP682wYV1LF5EU=; h=From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-Id; b=FZS53ukGPgZggdqcHOI4B0VDDMYi5WuiQAno6xGTdeBRTi8yVRWknNWuci4ZCnT2uxaKCZJgyDE8csIaCQhnzC1CUF1ZHrTsfzbB3aePFp11qPEfF6VfWsKbev9HROFEaATR8EYvrGoZOkT3i19qpEPoOIfKvhsTw6TSq125uHs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=RfzFlEdo; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RfzFlEdo" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56E881F000FF; Sun, 20 Sep 2026 06:54:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1789887294; bh=5+2YEPlp4H+FPCcvFGKV7EJU6cgtDOP682wYV1LF5EU=; h=From:Subject:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=RfzFlEdotszJ5Fcqgq//0+n3CGJGTchZODJe2UR2Egc+Z4TxewWSAwwnu1N6AgPT0 X3LTbCUh7PdT56mp5CIfhwndaH/vqnyFIglAM92RRr4GPR4WYhhVQhbXQn73Kr9Meu TAgcGRo1xbnZfFglPGxS/YskONGctW2HKRof/9V4Lef5L4WU2zy1ypsrJH7diKwSl7 pfVtwOVEgEzAArjS8tiquwh6kXf9URgERTrXeYuVeGP9p3gRALNwTd+xiN1INBNwOy DzLpXSCPzjHrUI5p0Dr6LYsz8oevJoDfqcqZ+dq6cs8IsIU/zdaHc3z0/B/thLwyxD HjQMWGWSHD23Q== From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 09/12] arm64: dts: s32g: Add SCMI reset controller Reply-To: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev To: =?utf-8?b?SmFuIFBldHJvdXMgKE9TUyk=?= Cc: robh@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, neil.armstrong@linaro.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com In-Reply-To: <20260919-s32g_serdes-v3-9-9d68868c1e89@oss.nxp.com> References: <20260919-s32g_serdes-v3-0-9d68868c1e89@oss.nxp.com> <20260919-s32g_serdes-v3-9-9d68868c1e89@oss.nxp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2026 06:54:53 +0000 Message-Id: <20260920065454.56E881F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: imx@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: > From: "Jan Petrous (OSS)" >=20 > Add the SCMI reset domain protocol (protocol@16) node under the SCMI > firmware node for both S32G2 and S32G3, so that on-SoC controllers can > request resets through the SCMI reset controller. >=20 > The node is labelled scmi_reset rather than reset: a label that > generic in a SoC .dtsi invites collisions and reads poorly at the use > sites, and the sibling clock protocol node already uses the shortened > clks form. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Jan Petrous (OSS) Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great! --=20 Sashiko AI review =C2=B7 https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260919-s32g_serde= s-v3-0-9d68868c1e89@oss.nxp.com?part=3D9