From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Xu Yang" <xu.yang_2@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev, Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] usb: gadget: uvc: refactor video cleanup into uvcg_video_deinit()
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 10:51:55 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923105156.5DC731F000FF@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923-usb-uvc-fixes-v2-2-844e04a4a4b7@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] usb: gadget: uvc: missing mutex in unbind causes UAF in uvcg_video_deinit()
--
commit 5b750200592f725e55689646ba5d3a79912818ba
Author: Xu Yang <xu.yang_2@nxp.com>
usb: gadget: uvc: refactor video cleanup into uvcg_video_deinit()
This commit consolidates the teardown logic for the UVC gadget's async
workqueue and kworker into a new uvcg_video_deinit() helper to prevent
resource leaks during bind failures and unbind. It also changes the unbind
sequence to tear down these resources after unregistering the V4L2 device.
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c
> index a4fb2790f4ffe..fa2f9d0e4ce0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1048,6 +1044,7 @@ static void uvc_function_unbind(struct usb_configuration *c,
>
> device_remove_file(&uvc->vdev.dev, &dev_attr_function_name);
> video_unregister_device(&uvc->vdev);
> + uvcg_video_deinit(video);
[Severity: High]
Can this cause a use-after-free if an ioctl is currently executing?
When uvc_function_unbind() calls video_unregister_device(), it clears
the registered flag but does not wait for active ioctls to complete. Since
uvc_function_unbind() does not hold video->mutex, an in-flight
VIDIOC_STREAMON ioctl could concurrently be executing uvcg_video_enable().
Meanwhile, uvc_function_unbind() proceeds to call uvcg_video_deinit()
without any locks.
> v4l2_device_unregister(&uvc->v4l2_dev);
>
> scoped_guard(mutex, &uvc->lock)
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_video.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_video.c
> index 9ba09118bb74a..002afca9141ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_video.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_video.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -841,3 +841,18 @@ int uvcg_video_init(struct uvc_video *video, struct uvc_device *uvc)
> return uvcg_queue_init(&video->queue, uvc->v4l2_dev.dev->parent,
> V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VIDEO_OUTPUT, &video->mutex);
> }
> +
> +void uvcg_video_deinit(struct uvc_video *video)
> +{
> + kthread_cancel_work_sync(&video->hw_submit);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(video->kworker)) {
> + kthread_destroy_worker(video->kworker);
> + video->kworker = NULL;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Does destroying the kworker here locklessly open a race window?
If uvcg_video_enable() is executing concurrently under video->mutex, it calls
kthread_queue_work(video->kworker, &video->hw_submit).
If uvcg_video_deinit() frees video->kworker before the ioctl finishes,
will uvcg_video_enable() dereference freed memory and crash the kernel?
> +
> + if (video->async_wq) {
> + destroy_workqueue(video->async_wq);
> + video->async_wq = NULL;
> + }
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260923-usb-uvc-fixes-v2-0-844e04a4a4b7@nxp.com?part=2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 10:39 [PATCH v2 0/2] usb: gadget: uvc: fix resource leak on video->async_wq and video->kworker Xu Yang
2026-09-23 10:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: gadget: uvc: replace mutex lock/unlock with scoped_guard in uvc_function_bind() Xu Yang
2026-09-23 10:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-09-23 10:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] usb: gadget: uvc: refactor video cleanup into uvcg_video_deinit() Xu Yang
2026-09-23 10:51 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260923105156.5DC731F000FF@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xu.yang_2@oss.nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox