From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
To: Frank Li <Frank.li@nxp.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>,
Fugang Duan <B38611@freescale.com>, Gao Pan <pandy.gao@nxp.com>,
Fugang Duan <fugang.duan@nxp.com>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore@oss.nxp.com>,
Larisa Grigore <larisa.grigore@nxp.com>,
Ghennadi Procopciuc <ghennadi.procopciuc@nxp.com>,
Ciprianmarian Costea <ciprianmarian.costea@nxp.com>,
s32@nxp.com, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/13] dt-bindings: lpspi: Update maximum num-cs value
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:31:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f401e84-7236-457f-a2ce-ee45898f1ab9@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJ4qw5eF10oJMIIA@lizhi-Precision-Tower-5810>
On 14/08/2025 7:28 pm, Frank Li wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 05:06:51PM +0100, James Clark wrote:
>> As mentioned in commit f46b06e62c86 ("spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Read
>> chip-select amount from hardware for i.MX93"), some devices support up
>> to 3 chip selects so update the max value.
>>
>> This isn't a fix or functional change because the devices with 3 chip
>> selects support reading the number of chip selects from hardware, so the
>> value wouldn't have needed to be set here. However the commit states
>> that the DT could be used to overwrite any HW value, so the full range
>> should be supported. This also avoids confusion for any readers about
>> how many chip selects there are.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.yaml | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.yaml
>> index a65a42ccaafe..ce7bd44ee17e 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-fsl-lpspi.yaml
>> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ properties:
>> description:
>> number of chip selects.
>> minimum: 1
>> - maximum: 2
>> + maximum: 3
>
> You need keep the same restriction for other compatible string, or need
Not sure I follow here. Don't the binding docs only cover the maximum
range of valid inputs for all covered platforms? They don't go into
details about which ranges are valid for every individual sub-platform.
For example if a platform didn't support DMA we wouldn't say it's not
valid to label DMA channels in the binding doc. If someone puts 3
instead of 2 then that's just a mistake, but documenting valid ranges
can't really fix a mistake like that. And changing 2 to 3 doesn't break
existing DTs, only making it smaller would.
> reason for other platform which also support up to 3.
The reason is that some platforms support 3, so I thought it made most
sense to set the max to 3. I replied more on the thread with Rob, but we
can just drop this one.
>
> Frank
>
>> default: 1
>>
>> power-domains:
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-18 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-14 16:06 [PATCH 00/13] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Generic fixes and support for S32G devices James Clark
2025-08-14 16:06 ` [PATCH 01/13] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Fix transmissions when using CONT James Clark
2025-08-14 16:06 ` [PATCH 02/13] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Set correct chip-select polarity bit James Clark
2025-08-14 16:49 ` Frank Li
2025-08-18 13:05 ` James Clark
2025-08-18 15:19 ` Frank Li
2025-08-19 8:21 ` James Clark
2025-08-19 14:11 ` Frank Li
2025-08-15 3:37 ` kernel test robot
2025-08-14 16:06 ` [PATCH 03/13] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Reset FIFO and disable module on transfer abort James Clark
2025-08-14 16:51 ` Frank Li
2025-08-18 13:17 ` James Clark
2025-08-14 16:06 ` [PATCH 04/13] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Clear status register after disabling the module James Clark
2025-08-14 16:58 ` Frank Li
2025-08-18 13:21 ` James Clark
2025-08-14 16:06 ` [PATCH 05/13] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Enumerate all pin configuration definitions James Clark
2025-08-14 18:10 ` Frank Li
2025-08-18 13:48 ` James Clark
2025-08-14 16:06 ` [PATCH 06/13] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Add DT property to override default pin config James Clark
2025-08-14 16:06 ` [PATCH 07/13] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Constify devtype datas James Clark
2025-08-14 18:38 ` Frank Li
2025-08-18 13:50 ` James Clark
2025-08-14 16:06 ` [PATCH 08/13] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Make prescale erratum a bool James Clark
2025-08-14 18:36 ` Frank Li
2025-08-18 13:54 ` James Clark
2025-08-14 16:06 ` [PATCH 09/13] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Parameterize reading num-cs from hardware James Clark
2025-08-14 18:31 ` Frank Li
2025-08-18 14:22 ` James Clark
2025-08-14 16:06 ` [PATCH 10/13] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Add compatible for S32G James Clark
2025-08-14 18:25 ` Frank Li
2025-08-18 14:31 ` James Clark
2025-08-18 15:18 ` Mark Brown
2025-08-19 8:23 ` James Clark
2025-08-18 15:28 ` Frank Li
2025-08-14 16:06 ` [PATCH 11/13] dt-bindings: lpspi: Update maximum num-cs value James Clark
2025-08-14 18:28 ` Frank Li
2025-08-18 13:31 ` James Clark [this message]
2025-08-14 20:59 ` Rob Herring
2025-08-18 12:49 ` James Clark
2025-08-14 16:06 ` [PATCH 12/13] dt-bindings: lpspi: Document nxp,lpspi-pincfg property James Clark
2025-08-14 18:19 ` Frank Li
2025-08-18 14:47 ` James Clark
2025-08-18 15:39 ` Frank Li
2025-08-19 9:51 ` James Clark
2025-08-19 14:08 ` Frank Li
2025-08-19 9:52 ` James Clark
2025-08-14 16:06 ` [PATCH 13/13] dt-bindings: lpspi: Document support for S32G James Clark
2025-08-14 18:23 ` Frank Li
2025-08-18 15:00 ` James Clark
2025-08-14 16:40 ` [PATCH 00/13] spi: spi-fsl-lpspi: Generic fixes and support for S32G devices Frank Li
2025-08-14 18:35 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3f401e84-7236-457f-a2ce-ee45898f1ab9@linaro.org \
--to=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=B38611@freescale.com \
--cc=Frank.li@nxp.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=ciprianmarian.costea@nxp.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=fugang.duan@nxp.com \
--cc=ghennadi.procopciuc@nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=larisa.grigore@nxp.com \
--cc=larisa.grigore@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pandy.gao@nxp.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=s32@nxp.com \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).