Linux kernel and device drivers for NXP i.MX platforms
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@intel.com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Cc: <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>, <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
	<xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>, <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
	<davem@davemloft.net>, <edumazet@google.com>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
	<pabeni@redhat.com>, <frank.li@nxp.com>, <horms@kernel.org>,
	<idosch@idosch.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <imx@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 net-next 1/4] net: enetc: add Tx checksum offload for i.MX95 ENETC
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 16:13:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f2eb433-479c-49d2-bc2f-07f6c0a52c60@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241213021731.1157535-2-wei.fang@nxp.com>

From: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 10:17:28 +0800

> In addition to supporting Rx checksum offload, i.MX95 ENETC also supports
> Tx checksum offload. The transmit checksum offload is implemented through
> the Tx BD. To support Tx checksum offload, software needs to fill some
> auxiliary information in Tx BD, such as IP version, IP header offset and
> size, whether L4 is UDP or TCP, etc.
> 
> Same as Rx checksum offload, Tx checksum offload capability isn't defined
> in register, so tx_csum bit is added to struct enetc_drvdata to indicate
> whether the device supports Tx checksum offload.

[...]

> @@ -163,6 +184,30 @@ static int enetc_map_tx_buffs(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  	dma_addr_t dma;
>  	u8 flags = 0;
>  
> +	enetc_clear_tx_bd(&temp_bd);
> +	if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
> +		/* Can not support TSD and checksum offload at the same time */
> +		if (priv->active_offloads & ENETC_F_TXCSUM &&
> +		    enetc_tx_csum_offload_check(skb) && !tx_ring->tsd_enable) {
> +			temp_bd.l3_aux0 = FIELD_PREP(ENETC_TX_BD_L3_START,
> +						     skb_network_offset(skb));
> +			temp_bd.l3_aux1 = FIELD_PREP(ENETC_TX_BD_L3_HDR_LEN,
> +						     skb_network_header_len(skb) / 4);
> +			temp_bd.l3_aux1 |= FIELD_PREP(ENETC_TX_BD_L3T,
> +						      enetc_skb_is_ipv6(skb));
> +			if (enetc_skb_is_tcp(skb))
> +				temp_bd.l4_aux = FIELD_PREP(ENETC_TX_BD_L4T,
> +							    ENETC_TXBD_L4T_TCP);
> +			else
> +				temp_bd.l4_aux = FIELD_PREP(ENETC_TX_BD_L4T,
> +							    ENETC_TXBD_L4T_UDP);
> +			flags |= ENETC_TXBD_FLAGS_CSUM_LSO | ENETC_TXBD_FLAGS_L4CS;
> +		} else {
> +			if (skb_checksum_help(skb))

Why not

		} else if (skb_checksum_help(skb)) {

?

> +				return 0;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
>  	i = tx_ring->next_to_use;
>  	txbd = ENETC_TXBD(*tx_ring, i);
>  	prefetchw(txbd);
> @@ -173,7 +218,6 @@ static int enetc_map_tx_buffs(struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring, struct sk_buff *skb)
>  
>  	temp_bd.addr = cpu_to_le64(dma);
>  	temp_bd.buf_len = cpu_to_le16(len);
> -	temp_bd.lstatus = 0;

Why is this removed and how is this change related to the checksum offload?

>  
>  	tx_swbd = &tx_ring->tx_swbd[i];
>  	tx_swbd->dma = dma;
> @@ -594,7 +638,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t enetc_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  {
>  	struct enetc_ndev_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
>  	struct enetc_bdr *tx_ring;
> -	int count, err;
> +	int count;
>  
>  	/* Queue one-step Sync packet if already locked */
>  	if (skb->cb[0] & ENETC_F_TX_ONESTEP_SYNC_TSTAMP) {
> @@ -627,11 +671,6 @@ static netdev_tx_t enetc_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb,
>  			return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (skb->ip_summed == CHECKSUM_PARTIAL) {
> -			err = skb_checksum_help(skb);
> -			if (err)
> -				goto drop_packet_err;
> -		}
>  		enetc_lock_mdio();
>  		count = enetc_map_tx_buffs(tx_ring, skb);
>  		enetc_unlock_mdio();
> @@ -3274,6 +3313,7 @@ static const struct enetc_drvdata enetc_pf_data = {
>  
>  static const struct enetc_drvdata enetc4_pf_data = {
>  	.sysclk_freq = ENETC_CLK_333M,
> +	.tx_csum = 1,

Maybe make it `bool tx_csum:1` instead of u8 and assign `true` here?

>  	.pmac_offset = ENETC4_PMAC_OFFSET,
>  	.eth_ops = &enetc4_pf_ethtool_ops,
>  };
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> index 72fa03dbc2dd..e82eb9a9137c 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h
> @@ -234,6 +234,7 @@ enum enetc_errata {
>  
>  struct enetc_drvdata {
>  	u32 pmac_offset; /* Only valid for PSI which supports 802.1Qbu */
> +	u8 tx_csum:1;
>  	u64 sysclk_freq;
>  	const struct ethtool_ops *eth_ops;
>  };

Thanks,
Olek

  reply	other threads:[~2024-12-17 15:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-12-13  2:17 [PATCH v8 net-next 0/4] Add more feautues for ENETC v4 - round 1 Wei Fang
2024-12-13  2:17 ` [PATCH v8 net-next 1/4] net: enetc: add Tx checksum offload for i.MX95 ENETC Wei Fang
2024-12-17 15:13   ` Alexander Lobakin [this message]
2024-12-18  1:53     ` Wei Fang
2024-12-13  2:17 ` [PATCH v8 net-next 2/4] net: enetc: update max chained Tx BD number " Wei Fang
2024-12-13  2:17 ` [PATCH v8 net-next 3/4] net: enetc: add LSO support for i.MX95 ENETC PF Wei Fang
2024-12-17  9:20   ` Paolo Abeni
2024-12-17 12:52     ` Wei Fang
2024-12-17 15:32   ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-12-18  3:06     ` Wei Fang
2024-12-18  5:45       ` Wei Fang
2024-12-18 14:30       ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-12-19  1:32         ` Wei Fang
2024-12-19 15:16           ` Alexander Lobakin
2024-12-13  2:17 ` [PATCH v8 net-next 4/4] net: enetc: add UDP segmentation offload support Wei Fang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5f2eb433-479c-49d2-bc2f-07f6c0a52c60@intel.com \
    --to=aleksander.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=frank.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=idosch@idosch.org \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    --cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
    --cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox